This paper is based on test, results and shows how the characteristics of a measured profile—depth of roughness, ripple, and outliers—can be recognized individually and expressed numerically by varying the measuring conditions with respect to the test probe, the length measured, the cut-off, and the nominal parameter.
BickelE.‘New methods, and definition of surface quality’. Industrielle Org.1946 (No. 6) and 1947 (No. 1).
3.
PerthenJ.Testing and measuring surface features1949 (Hanser-Verlag, Munich).
4.
SchlessingerG.The measurement of surface quality1951 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
5.
von WeingraberH.‘The definition of surface roughness’, Werkstattstechnik195646.
6.
WolffH.‘The significance of cut-off in surface testing using probe-section equipment’, Werhst. Betr.195992 (No. 11).
7.
WolffH.‘Surface testing with probe-section equipment’, Werkst. Betr.196396 (No. 11).
8.
ReasonR.The measurement of surface texture1960 (Cleaver-Hume Press Ltd.).
9.
KohlhageE.‘The effects of reference system, surface coefficients, measuring equipment, and manufacturing variations on the accuracy of roughness testing’, thesis, Tech. Hochschule, Aachen, 1962.
10.
TrumpoldH.‘Limitations to the use of surface comparison pieces’, Feingerätetechnik1966 (No. 5).
11.
WolffH.‘An electronic surface tester’, Z. InstrumKde196674 (No. 11).
12.
WolffH.‘A computer for surface testing’, Z. InstrumKde196775 (No. 9).
