A Review of Hydrokinetic Fluid Drives and Their Possibilities for the British Motor Industry

Abstract

The history of the development of hydrokinetic fluid transmissions is traced from its origin by Föttinger to the present time, and the important early developments and types of device are recorded. Consideration is given to special design features and current practice for the use of these devices in transmissions for motor vehicles, and the theoretical basis of design is reviewed briefly. Four important aspects of a specification for an automatic transmission for motor vehicles are enumerated, and the hydrokinetic fluid drive is shown to have characteristics specially suited to the fulfilment of this specification.

The trend of development after the 1939–45 war of these drives in the United States of America is discussed, and appears to be reaching finality. The application of this American experience to European conditions is considered; some versions of the automatic fluid transmission show possibilities for achieving an acceptable operating performance for lower power/weight ratio applications. The wider range of torque conversion necessary for the more popular cars results in a more complicated and costly transmission, so that it does not yet appear likely that this form of automatic transmission will become universal in the British industry.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anon. 1932 Engineering, vol. 133, p. 182, ‘Vickers-Coats Torque Converter’.

Anon. 1951 Jl. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 59, No. 3. p. 39, ‘Hydrodynamic Drive Terminology’.

Anon. 1955 Product Engineering, vol. 26, No. 2, p. 150, ‘Plane Propeller Pitch Changer in Buick Dynaflow Transmission’.

Auer

1954 ATZ (Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift), vol. 56, No. 2, p. 32, ‘Die Abstimmung der Föttinger-Kupplung auf das Kraftfahrzeug' ('Matching the Föttinger Transmission to the Vehicle').

Bugbee

J. T.

1952 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 6, No. 1, p. 107, ‘Talented Transmissions’.

Caris

D. F.

Richardson

R. A.

1952 Soc. Automotive Eng. Preprint June, ‘Engine-transmission Relationship for Higher Efficiency’.

Cass

1954–55 Proc. I.Mech.E., Automobile Division, p. 199, ‘Heavy-duty Truck Development in the United States of America’.

Chayne

C. A.

1948 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 2, No. 3, p. 477, ‘Buick Dynaflow Drive’.

Chayne

C. A.

1952–53 Proc. I.Mech.E., Automobile Division, p. 9, ‘Automatic Transmissions in America’.

10.

Edsall

1953 Automotive Industries, vol. 108, No. 9, p. 66, ‘Ideal Automatic Transmissions’.

11.

Eksergian

1943 Jl. Franklin Inst., vol. 235, No. 5, p. 441, ‘Torque Converter and Fluid Coupling’.

12.

Föttinger

1935 Proc. I.Mech.E., vol. 130, p. 158, Discussion on ‘Recent Developments in Hydraulic Couplings’.

13.

Geschelin

1955 Automotive Industries, vol. 112, No. 3, p. 48, ‘New Highs in Horsepower and Torque’.

14.

Gibson

W. B.

1953 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 61, p. 409, ‘Hydraulic Torque Converter’.

15.

Gorsky

R. J.

1954 Soc. Automotive Eng. Preprint January, ‘Buick's Twin Turbine Dynaflow Transmission’.

16.

Greenlea

H. R.

1946 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 54, No. 8, p. 440, ‘Automatic and Semi-automatic Transmissions’.

17.

Gsching

1952 ‘Über die Entwicklung hydrodynamischer Wandler' ('On the Development of the Hydrodynamic Transmission') (J. M. Voith, Heidenheim-Brenz).

18.

Gsching

1953 ATZ, vol. 55, No. 3, p. 53, ‘Das Voith-Diwabus-Getriebe' ('The Voith-Diwabus Transmission').

19.

Hahn

1935 Proc. I.Mech.E., vol. 130, p. 231, ‘Voith Turbo Transmissions’.

20.

Haworth

H. F.

Lysholm

1935 Proc. I.Mech.E., vol. 130, p. 193, ‘Progress in Design and Application of the Lysholm-Smith Torque Converter’.

21.

Heldt

P. M.

1947 ‘Torque Converters or Transmissions’, p. 438 (Nyack, New York).

22.

Heldt

P. M.

1946 Jl. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 54, No. 7, p. 330, ‘Transmissions Giving Uninterrupted Acceleration’.

23.

Hele-Shaw

H. S.

1921 Proc. I.Mech.E., vol. 2, p. 843, ‘Power Transmission by Oil’.

24.

Heller

1928 Z.V.D.I., vol. 72, p. 269, ‘Neuere Wechselgetriebe' ('Recent Torque Converters').

25.

Hennings

1952 ATZ, vol. 54, No. 7, p. 147, ‘Über das Kennfeld dreikränziger Föttinger-Getriebe' ('On the Characteristic Field of 3-element Föttinger Transmissions').

26.

Herndon

W. B.

1952 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 6, No. 1, p. 128, ‘Hydramatic Transmission’.

27.

Kelley

O. K.

1949 Soc. Automotive Eng. Preprint January, ‘Is the Torque Converter Going to be “It” ?’.

28.

Kelley

O. K.

1952 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 6, No. 2, p. 347, ‘Automatic and Hydraulic Transmissions’.

29.

Kelley

O. K.

1952 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 6, No. 1, p. 138, ‘The Polyphase Torque Converter’.

30.

Knaak

1954 Z.V.D.I., vol. 96, No. 26, p. 899, ‘Vergleich zwischen Triebwerken mit Zahnradwechselgetrieben und Föttinger-Wandler auf Grund gemessener Fahrleistungen' ('A Comparison Between Geared and Föttinger Transmissions on the Basis of Measured Performance').

31.

Kollman

Förster

H. J.

1950 ATZ, vol. 52, No. 4, p. 89, ‘Amerikanische Fahrzeuggetriebe' ('American Vehicle Transmissions').

32.

Kugel

1948 ‘Einfluss des Überlagerungsdruckes bei Drehmomentwandlern' ('On the Influence of Increased Pressures in the Torque Converter') (J. M. Voith, Heidenheim-Brenz).

33.

Kugel

1954 Jl. Inst. Locomotive Eng., vol. 44, p. 594, ‘A Modern Hydraulic Drive for Locomotives’. Discussion.

34.

Lea

F. C.

1938 Engineering, vol. 146, p. 268, ‘The Salerni Hydro-kinetic Power Transmitter’.

35.

Lucia

C. J.

De Lorean

J. Z.

1955 Soc. Automotive Eng. Preprint June, ‘The Twin Ultramatic Transmission’.

36.

M'Ewen

1947–48 Proc. I.Mech.E., Automobile Division, p. 97, ‘Recent Developments in Automobile Transmissions’.

37.

Maier

1953 ATZ, vol. 55, No. 8, p. 205, ‘Neuere Entwicklungen im Personenwagengetriebebau' ('Recent Developments in Private-car Transmissions').

38.

Martyrer

1952 Z.V.D.I., vol. 94, No. 5, p. 127, ‘Über das Anfahrverhalten von Föttinger-Drehmomentwandlern' ('On the Starting Behaviour of Föttinger Transmissions').

39.

North

O. D.

1951 Automobile Engineer, vol. 4, Nos. 538, p. 83, 539, p. 123, ‘P.N.D.L.R.—A Detailed Study of the American Torque Converters’.

40.

Phillips

R. E.

1916 Proc. I.Mech.E., p. 783, ‘Variable-speed Gears for Motor Road-vehicles’.

41.

Rodger

W. R.

Syrovy

A. J.

1954 Soc. Automotive Eng. Preprint January, ‘The Chrysler Powerflite Transmission’.

42.

Schaefer

R. M.

1952 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 6, No. 1, p. 147, ‘Two-stage Torque Converter and Double Clutch’.

43.

Shorter

J. L.

1937–38 Proc. I.A.E., vol. 38, p. 337, ‘Transmission Gear Developments’.

44.

Sinclair

1935 Proc. I.Mech.E., vol. 130, p. 75, ‘Recent Developments in Hydraulic Couplings’.

45.

Sinclair

1938 Proc. I.Mech.E., vol. 139, p. 83, ‘Some Problems in the Transmission of Power by Fluid Couplings’.

46.

Spannhake

E. W.

1949 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 3, No. 4, p. 592, ‘Hydrodynamics of the Hydraulic Torque Converter’.

47.

Stepanoff

A. J.

1948 ‘Centrifugal and Axial Flow Pumps’ (J. Wiley and Sons, New York).

48.

Waclawek

M. J.

1952 Soc. Automotive Eng. Preprint December, ‘Torque Converters for Industrial and Commercial Vehicles’.

49.

Wilson

W. G.

1938 Proc. I.Mech.E., vol. 140, p. 67, ‘The Control of Diesel Railcars with Particular Reference to Transmissions’.

50.

Youngs

P. R.

1952 Trans. Soc. Automotive Eng., vol. 6, No. 1, p. 134, ‘The Transition from Torque Converter to Fluid Coupling’.

51.

Ziebart

1953 Z.V.D.I., vol. 95, No. 30, p. 1027, ‘Untersuchungen an einem Föttinger-Getriebe' ('Investigations on a Föttinger Transmission').

52.

Brown

T. W. F.

1955 Trans. Inst. Naval Architects, vol. 97, p. 36, ‘The Measurement of Power’.

53.

Froude

1877 Proc. I.Mech.E., vol. 28, p. 237, ‘On a New Dynamometer for Measuring the Power Delivered to the Screws of Large Ships’.

54.

Hirn

G. A.

1875 ‘Théorie mecanique de la Chaleur' ('Mechanical Theory of Heat'), third edition (Gautier-Villars, Paris).

55.

Reynolds

1901 ‘Papers on Mechanical and Physical Subjects, 1881–1900’, vol. II (Cambridge University Press).