The Running-in of Engines: Choice of Cylinder Bore Finish

Abstract

The process of mating of piston rings and cylinder bores in newly assembled Diesel and petrol engines is described, and it is shown that an optimum surface finish exists which leads to rapid running-in—or break-in as it is sometimes termed—when either straight mineral or additive type engine oils are used. In particular it is shown that the running-in of engines fitted with either cast-iron or chromium-plated piston rings may be of short duration when additive type engine lubricants are used in conjunction with a suitable bore finish. Rig and engine tests are described which demonstrate the influence of surface finish on both the wear and the consumption of oil which occur during the running-in process.

It is suggested that there are two components of surface finish which affect the running-in process. One of these components, the surface undulations of short wavelength (surface roughness) influences the rate of wear during break-in, whilst the surface undulations of longer wavelength (surface waviness) determine the amount of wear which must occur before the running-in process is complete. Whatever surface finish is chosen for the cylinder bore, to achieve a break-in which is as rapid as possible it is desirable to eliminate those errors in the machining process which give rise to waviness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bowden

F. P.

Ridler

K. E. W.

1936 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, vol. 154, ‘The Surface Temperature of Sliding Metals: The Temperature of Lubricated Surfaces’.

Bowden

F. P.

Tabor

1950 ‘The Friction and Lubrication of Solids’, p. 33 (The Clarendon Press, Oxford).

Clayton

1945 Proc. I. Mech. E., vol. 153, p. 332, Conference on Surface Finish, ‘Short Review of Surface Finish in Relation to Friction and Lubrication’. (This paper reviews the work of a number of investigators and is a valuable source of references to work on the relation between surface finish and lubrication.).

Connor

K. W.

Martz

L. S.

1940 Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Proc. Conference on Friction and Surface Finish, p. 174.

Davies

C. B.

1951 Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 53, p. 934, ‘Influence of Roughness and Oxidation on Wear of Lubricated Sliding Metal Surfaces’.

Hepworth

J. L.

1949–50 Proc. I. Mech. E., Automobile Division, p. 173, Communication on ‘Metal Transfer from Piston Rings During Run-in’, by C. D. Strang and J. T. Burwell.

Hinzman

1939 Metallwirtschaft, vol. 18, p. 991.

Kline

J. E.

1935 Mech. Engr., vol. 57, pp. 7, 49, 52, ‘Desired Characters of Surface Finishes’.

Lewis

C. R.

1952 Soc. Automotive Eng. Jl., vol. 60, pp. 57–60, ‘Surface Finish: Its Effect on Wear’.

10.

Olive

1951, July Revue Gen. de Mecanique, vol. 35, p. 213, ‘Emploi de Segments Chromes dans Les Moteurs Diesel de la S. N.C. F.’.

11.

Reason

R. E.

Hopkins

M. R.

Garrod

R. I.

1944 ‘Report on the Measurement of Surface Finish by Stylus Methods’ (Taylor-Hobson Research Dept.).

12.

Swain

1945 Proc. I. Mech. E., vol. 153, p. 345, Conference on Surface Finish, ‘Continuity in the Production of Specified Surface Finish’.

13.

Underwood

A. F.

1940 Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Proc. Conference on Friction and Surface Finish, p. 5, ‘Some General Aspects of Rubbing Surfaces’.

14.

Whitehead

S. C.

Snell

W. A.

1953 Jl. Inst. Petrol., vol. 39, p. 508, ‘Some Aspects Involved in the Evaluation of Engine Lubricating Oils: Field Testing and the Evaluation of Diesel Lubricating Oils’.