The discrepancy between measured and calculated oil-film thickness under a piston ring is shown to be due to oil starvation. If care is taken to keep the inlet region filled with oil, the film thickness is found to obey the theory. A simple formula is derived for predicting the degree of starvation to be expected when more than one piston ring is fitted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LloydT.‘The hydrodynamic lubrication of piston rings’, Proc. Instn mech. Engrs1968–69183 (Pt 3B), 28–34.
2.
McCallionH.LloydT.LargeJ.‘The formation of piston ring profiles’, Tribology Convention1972, 55–61 (Instn mech. Engrs, London).
3.
TingL. L.MayerJ. E.‘Piston ring lubrication and cylinder bore wear analysis’, A.S.M.E. Lubrication Conference 1973 (Atlanta).
4.
AllenD. G.DudleyB. R.MiddletonV.ParkerD. A.‘Prediction of cylinder bore oil film thickness in two particular engines’, Conference on piston ring scuffing 1975, 107–124 (Instn mech. Engrs, London).
5.
HamiltonG. M.MooreS. L.‘The lubrication of piston rings’, Proc. Instn mech. Engrs1974188, 253–268.
6.
BrownS. R.HamiltonG. M.MooreS. L.‘Hydro-dynamic pressure under a piston ring’, Nature1975253, 341–342.
7.
BrownS. R.HamiltonG. M.‘Pressure measurement between the rings and cylinder liner of an engine’, Conference on piston ring scuffing 1975, 99–106 (Instn mech. Engrs, London).
8.
SwiftH. W.‘The stability of lubricating films in journal bearings’, Proc. Instn civ. Engrs1931–32233, 267–322.
9.
DykesP. K.‘An investigation into the mechanism of oil loss past pistons’, Proc. Instn mech. Engrs1957171, 413–426.
