The design, function, and durability of four pericardial bioprostheses have been studied in the laboratory. Variations in design and construction affected both the pressure difference across the valves and the leaflet dynamics. In the durability tests tissue failure was found in all valves, with tears at the edge of the leaflets caused by abrasion on the cloth-covered inner frames. In the Ionescu–Shiley standard valves, tears were also detected at the coaption sutures. These results have been compared with failure modes in explanted clinical valves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BraisM. P. et al. (1985) Ionescu–Shiley pericardial xenograft follow-up of up to six years, Ann. Thorac. Surg., 39, 105–111.
2.
FisherJ. et al. (1986) Design of a function test apparatus for prosthetic heart valves. Initial results in the mitral position, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas, 6, 63–73.
3.
GabbayS. et al. (1984a) Longterm follow-up of the Ionescu–Shiley mitral pericardial xenograft, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 88, 758–763.
4.
GabbayS. et al. (1984b) Fatigue induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 87, 836–844.
5.
GalloI. et al. (1985) Incidence of primary tissue failure with the Ionescu–Shiley pericardial valve, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 90, 278–280.
6.
IonescuM. I. et al. (1981) Low profile prosthetic heart valve, European Patent Application 81305112224.
7.
IonescuM. I. et al. (1982) Clinical experience of the pericardial xenograft, 11 years experience, In Cardiac Bioprostheses, (Edited by CohnL. H.GallucciV.) Yorke Medical Books, New York, pp. 42–60.
8.
MartinT. R. P. et al. (1980) Accelerated fatigue tests on biological tissue valves, Proc. ESAO, 7, 315–318.
9.
RainerW. G. (1985) Discussion of in vivo haemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 89, 358–368.
10.
ReeceI. J. et al. (1986) A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu–Shiley low profile pericardial bioprosthesis, Z. Kardiol., 75 (Suppl.), 232–236.
11.
ThubrikarM. J. et al. (1982) Design and stress analysis of bioprosthetic valves in vivo, In Cardiac Bioprostheses, (Edited by CohnL. H.GallucciV.) Yorke Medical Books, New York, pp. 445–455.