This paper presents a practical approach for optimization by evolutionary computation of safety instrumented system design, based on safety and reliability measures, plus life cycle cost. The standard IEC 61508 establishes the necessity of this kind of systems to meet specific safety integrity requirements, expressed in terms of safety integrity levels (SIL). The SIL is determined in terms of average probability of failure on demand (PFDavg) for control systems that operate in demand mode. The optimization executed takes into account the level of modelling detail contemplated by the standard, including multiple failure modes, diagnostic coverage, and common cause failures. This study addresses the case of series-parallel systems. Optimization is approached by treating the problem as one of redundancy and reliability allocation, together with testing intervals specifications. Modelling is made through fault tree analysis with house events. The multi-objective genetic algorithm proposed by Fonseca and Fleming is used as the optimization technique.
CoitD. W.SmithA.Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems using a genetic algorithmIEEE Trans. Reliability, 1996, 45 (2), 254–260.
2.
IdaK.GenM.YokotaT.System reliability optimization problems with several failure modes by genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference onComputers and industrial engineering, Ashikaga, Japan, 7–9 March 1994, pp. 349–352.
3.
PaintonL.CampbellJ.Genetic algorithms in optimization of system reliabilityIEEE Trans. Reliability, 1995, 44 (2), 172–178.
GenM.YunY.Soft computing approach for reliability optimization; state-of-the-art surveyRel. Engng. System Safety, 2006, 91 (9), 1008–1026.
6.
BusaccaP. G.MarseguerraM.ZioE.Multiobjective optimization by genetic algorithms: application to safety systemsRel. Engng. System Safety, 2001, 72 (1), 59–74.
7.
SalazarD.RoccoC. M.GalvánB. J.Optimization of constrained multiple-objective reliability problems using evolutionary algorithmsRel. Engng. System Safety, 2006, 1 (9), 1057–1070.
8.
YangJ.HwangM.SungT.JinY.Application of genetic algorithm for reliability allocation in nuclear power plantsRel. Engng. System Safety, 1999, 65 (3), 229–238.
9.
ElegbedeC.AdjallahK.Availability allocation to repairable systems with genetic algorithms: a multiobjective formulationRel. Engng. System Safety, 2003, 82 (3), 319–330.
10.
CantoniM.MarseguerraM.ZioE.Genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation for optimal plant designRel. Engng. System Safety, 2000, 68 (1), 29–38.
11.
MartorellS.SánchezA.CarlosS.SerradelV.Alternatives and challenges in optimizing industrial safety using genetic algorithmsRel. Engng. System Safety, 2004, 86 (1), 25–34.
12.
MartorellS.VillanuevaJ. F.CarlosS.NebotY.SánchezA.PtchardJ. L.SerradellV.RAMS+C informed decision-making with application to multi-objective optimization of technical specifications and maintenance using genetic algorithmsRel. Engng. System Safety, 2005, 87 (1), 65–75.
13.
MarseguerraM.ZioE.PodofilliniL.Optimal reliability/availability of uncertain systems via multi-objective genetic algorithmsIEEE Trans. Reliability, 2004, 53 (3), 524–434.
14.
MarseguerraM.ZioE.PodofilliniL.A multiobjective genetic algorithm approach to the optimization of the technical specifications of a nuclear safety systemRel. Engng. System Safety, 2004, 84 (1), 87–99.
15.
International Electrotechnical Commission.IEC 61508. Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems. Parts 1–7, 1998–2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
16.
AndrewsJ. D.BartlettL. M.Genetic algorithm optimisation of a firewater deluge systemQuality Rel. Engng. Int., 2003, 19 (1), 39–52.
17.
PattisonR. L.AndrewsJ. D.Genetic algorithms in optimal safety system designInstn Mech. Engrs, Part E: J. Process Mechanical Engineering, 1999, 213 (E), 187–97.
18.
FonsecaC. M.FlemingP. J.Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalisation. In Proceeding of the 5th International Conference onGenetic algorithms (Ed. ForrestS.), 1993, pp. 416–423 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA).
19.
International Electrotechnical Commission.IEC 61511. Functional safety - safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector. Parts 1–3, 2003, Geneva, Switzerland.
20.
GobleW. M.Conrol systems safety evaluation and reliability, 1998 (The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society, NC, US).
21.
GobleW. M.CheddieH.Safety instrumented systems verification, 2005 (The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society, NC, US).
22.
GruhnP.CheddieH.Safety instrumented systems: design, analysis and justification, 2005, edition 2 (The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society, NC, US).
23.
HollandJ. H.Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, 1975 (University of Michigan Press, Ann Harbor).
24.
FonsecaC. M.FlemingP. J.Multiobjective genetic algorithms made easy: selection, sharing and mating restriction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference onGenetic algorithms in engineering systems: innovations and application (Ed. ZalzalaA. M. S.), 1995, pp. 45–52 (Institution of Electrical Engineers, Stevenage, UK).
25.
FonsecaC. M.FlemingP. J.Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms I: a unified formulationIEEE Trans. Syst. Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Syst. and Humans, 1998, 28 (1), 38–47.
26.
ChipperfieldA.FlemingP.PolheimH.FonsecaC.Genetic algorithm toolbox user's guide. Research report 512, 1994 (Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering University of Sheffield, UK).
