New insight into the average probability of failure on demand and the probability of dangerous failure per hour of safety instrumented systems

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to give a new insight into some fundamental concepts of the IEC 61508 standard. First, low and high or continuous demand modes of operation of safety instrumented systems are examined by analysing their official definitions given in the IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 standards. In this context, the paper proposes a new criterion for distinguishing these two modes of operation. A study allowing the determination of accident frequency is also presented, where the system under study consists of one element under control and its associated safety instrumented system. Second, the relationship between the average probabilities of failure on demand and the risk reduction factor is studied. It is shown that the commonly used approach (the standard approach) may lead to an optimistic value for the risk reduction factor. Finally, the paper clarifies the nature of the probability of failure per hour of a safety instrumented system and proposes different ways to compute this in the general case, based on fault tree, Markov model, and Petri nets approaches.

Keywords

IEC 61508 standard safety instrumented system probability of failure per hour fault tree piecewise Markovian models Petri nets with predicates

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

IEC 61508 standard: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems, Parts 1 to 7, 1998–2000 (International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland)

IEC 61511 standard: Functional safety – safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector, Parts 1 to 3, 2003 (International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland)

Innal

Contribution to modelling safety instrumented systems and to assessing their performance – Critical analysis of IEC 61508 standard. PhD thesis, Université Bordeaux-1, France, 2008 (English version available from the author).

Misumi

Sato

‘Estimation of average hazardous-event frequency for allocation of safety-integrity levels’

Reliability Engng Syst. Safety 66 (N2) (1999): 135–144

Bukowski

J. V

‘Incorporating process demand into models for assessment of safety system performance’ (2006)

Innal

Dutuit

Rauzy

Signoret

J. P

‘An attempt to better understand and to better apply some of recommendations of IEC 61508 standard’. In Proceedings of the 30th ESReDA Seminar on Reliability of safety critical systems, SINTEF/NTU, Trondheim, Norway, 7–8 June 2007, pp. 1–16 (JRC, Ispra, Italy).

Yoshimura

Sato

‘Safety achieved by the safe failure fraction (SFF) in IEC 61508’

IEEE Trans. Reliability 57 (2008): 662–669

Vesely

W. E

‘A time-dependent methodology for fault tree evaluation’

Nucl. Engng Des. 13 (1970): 337–360

Dowell

A. M

‘Layer of protection analysis for determining safety integrity level’

ISA Trans. 37 (1998): 155–165

10.

Marszal

E. M

‘An example of layer of protection: Analysis using the PROBE tool,’ 2000 Available from www.exida.com.

11.

Kumamoto

Henley

E. J

Probabilistic risk assessment and management for engineers and scientists (Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE Press 1996)

12.

Dutuit

Rauzy

Signoret

J.-P

‘A snapshot of methods and tools to assess safety integrity levels of high-integrity protection systems’

Proc. IMechE, Part O: J. Risk and Reliability 222 (O3) (2008): 371–379 DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR147.

13.

Cocozza-Thivent

Processes stochastiques et fiabilité des systèmes (Berlin: Springer 1997)

14.

Dutuit

Rauzy

‘Approximate estimation of system reliability via fault trees’

Reliability Engng Syst. Safety 87 (N2) (2005): 163–172