Analysis on the effective position of a reinforcement patch used as crack arrest for plates with mixed-mode (I/II) cracks

Abstract

Rectangular patches are usually used as the temporary crack stoppers ahead of the tips of macro cracks. As mixed-mode cracks are usually initiated in engineering structures, the relative position of reinforcement patches to crack tips should be carefully considered. There will be many directions around crack tips for allocating reinforcement patches and the effectiveness of reinforcement patches should be quite dependent on their allocation positions, which can be expressed by the distance between the crack tip and patch, and also the direction of the patch relative to the crack line. The present paper will aim to examine the proper position for allocating the reinforcement patch by comparing the reduction level of the stress intensity factors. Finite element analysis will be conducted for this purpose. The optimum position for allocating the reinforcement patch will be determined, which will be further compared with crack propagation direction determined by strain energy density theory for an elastic cracked body. The conclusion is drawn that the patch with proper stiffness should be allocated in the direction of initial crack propagation near the crack tips. Its effectiveness will not be satisfactory when allocated away from the region.

Keywords

mixed-mode crack reinforcement patch crack arrest stress intensity factors strain energy density

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Paik

J. K.

Thayamballi

A. K

. Ultimate limit state design of steel plated structures, 2003 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK).

2 Goto

Miyagawa

Nisitani

. Crack growth arresting property of a hole and Brinell-type dimple. Fatigue Fract. Engng Mater. Structs, 1996, 19(1), 39–49.

3 Murdani

Makabe

Saimoto

Kon-dou

. A crack-growth arresting technique in aluminum alloy. Engng Failure Analysis, 2008, 15(4), 302–310.

4 Wang

Q. Y.

Pidaparti

R. M

. Static characteristics and fatigue behavior of composite-repaired aluminum plates. Composite Structs, 2002, 56(2), 151–155.

5 Hosseini-Toudeshky

Sadeghi

Da-ghyani

H. R

. Experimental fatigue crack growth and crack-front shape analysis of asymmetric repaired aluminium panels with glass/epoxy composite patches. Composite Structs, 2005, 71(3–4), 401–406.

6 Zacharopoulos

D. A

. Arrestment of cracks in plane extension by local reinforcements. Theoret. Appl. Fract. Mechanics, 1999, 32(3), 177–188.

7 Al-Ostaz

Jasiuk

. Crack initiation and propagation in materials with randomly distributed holes. Engng Fract. Mechanics, 1997, 58(5–6), 395–420.

8 Xie

J. G.

. The study of repair metal structure with cracks (in Chinese). Machinery, 2003, 4, 78–80.

9 Zhao

Jiang

C. X.

Liu

T. G

. Ductile fracture analysis on the crack arrest effect of the crack front reinforcement (in Chinese). Shipbuilding ofChina, 2005, 46(3), 34–40.

10.

10 Sih

G. C

. Mechanics of fracture initiation and propagation, 1991 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London).

11.

11 Zhang

Zhao

Y. X

. Revise for the theory of station energy density factor (in Chinese). J. Baoji College of Arts and Sciences (Natural Science), 1996, 6(1), 70–74.

12.

12 Machida

. Ductile fracture mechanics (in Japanese), 1984 (Nikkan Kogyo Shimbunsha (Daily Engineering Newspaper Company), Tokyo, Japan).

13.

13 Turton

T. J.

Dalzel-Job

Livingstone

. Oil platforms, destroyers and frigates-case studies of QinetiQ's marine composite patch repairs. Composites Part A, 2005, 36(8), 1066–1072.

14.

14 China Research Institute of Aviation, Handbook of stress intensity factor (in Chinese), 1993 (Science Press, Beijing).

15.

15 Quaresimin

Ricotta

. Stress intensity factors and strain energy release rates in single lap bonded joints in composite materials. Composites Sci. Technol., 2006, 66(5), 647–656.

16.

16 Wang

Huang

X. P.

Cui

W. C

. Stress intensity factor and ultimate tensile strength analysis of eccentrically cracked plates. J. Ship Mechanics, 2005, 9(3), 97–110.