In this paper, a mathematical model for ship squat in highly restricted waterways is proposed. This model, which is based on the extension of Schijf's (1949) theory to dynamic effects, indicates stable and unstable squat positions for a ship. Furthermore, the transition effects are integrated into this model to simulate the behaviour of a vessel during and after an acceleration phase. This model shows that, although the vessel speed is lower than the Schijf limiting speed, grounding due to the oscillations generated at the end of the acceleration phase may occur when the unstable equilibrium position is reached. The results given by the mathematical model are validated by a numerical model based on finite element analysis.
HervieuR.Le surenfoncement des navires(Masson, Paris). Masson1993)
2.
BarrassC. B.DerrettD. R.Ship stability for master and mates (Elsevier, Amsterdam). Elsevier 2006)
3.
BriggsM. J.VantorreM.UliczkaK.DebaillonP.‘Prediction of squat for underkeel clearance.’ In Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering (Ed. KumY. C.), 2009, ch. 26 (World Scientific, Singapore).
4.
SchijfJ. B., Influence of the form and dimensions of the cross-section of the canal, of the form, the speed and the propulsion system of vessels, and of the speed of flows and especially of the waves of translation on the protection of embankments. In Proceedings of the 17th International Navigation Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 1949, section 1, subject 2, pp. 61–78 (Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Brussels).
5.
ConstantineT.‘On the movement of ships in restricted waterways.’J. Fluid Mech.9 (1960): 247–256
6.
TuckE.‘Shallow-water flows past slender bodies.’J. Fluid Mech.26 (1966): 81–95
7.
GourlayT.‘Slender-body methods for predicting ship squat.’Ocean Engng35 (2008): 191–200
8.
EryuzluN. F.HausserR.‘Experimental investigation into some aspects of large vessel navigation in restricted waterways.’ In Proceedings of the Symposium onAspects of navigability of constraint waterways including harbour entrances, Delft, The Netherlands, 24–27 April 1978, vol. 2, pp. 1–15 (Delft Hydraulics Laboratory, Delft).
9.
GourlayT.Mathematical and computational techniques for predicting the squat of ships Thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 2000.
10.
DebaillonP.‘Numerical investigation to predict ship squat.’J. Ship Res. (2010): (in press)
11.
DebaillonP.LefrançoisE.SergentP.DhattG.‘Numerical modeling of ship squat in shallow restricted water.’ In Proceedings of the Second Squat Workshop, Oldenburg, Germany, 3–4 March 2004.
12.
Hydraulic design of deep-draft navigation projects, Engineer Manual 1110–2-1613 (US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 2006)
13.
DhattG.TouzotG.The finite element method displayed (John Wiley, New York1982)
14.
DebaillonP.Système de modélisation de l'enfoncement dynamique des bateaux Thesis, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Compiègne, France, 2005.
15.
JohnsonA.TezduyarT.‘Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces.’Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng119 (1994): 73–94
16.
LefrançoisE.‘A simple mesh deformation technique for fluid–structure interaction based on a submesh approach.’Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng75 (2008): 1085–1101
17.
BalaninV. V.BykovL. S.‘Selection of leading dimensions of navigation canal sections and modern methods of bank protection.’ In Proceedings of the 21st International Navigation Compress, Stockholm, Sweden, 1965, SI4, pp. 151–169 (Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Brussels).
