The design of mechanical seals for applications requiring the control of fugitive emissions is reviewed. The paper discusses the features inherent in seal design and how these affect overall performance; it also examines the effect of materials of construction. Selection guidelines comparing various mechanical seal arrangements are included, these being based on operational experience in working plants. Significant events in the development of emission regulations and therefore modern sealing solutions are described.
API 682 Shaft sealing systems for centrifugal and rotary pumps, 1st edition, October 1994 (American Petroleum Institute, New York).
2.
SuraudF.Impending European emission regulations and current national responses. In Proceedings of the Joint IMechE—STLE Emissions Conference, 1994.
3.
USA regulations on fugitive emissions. Report 003/94, European Sealing Association, June 1994.
4.
Guidelines for meeting emission regulations for rotating machinery with mechanical seals. STLE special publication SP-30, Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers, revised April 1994.
5.
Meeting emission legislation requirements with today's advanced technology mechanical seal systems. Publication 005/95, European Sealing Association, November 1995.
6.
FlitneyR. K.NauB. S.Vapour emission from rotary shaft seals in petrochemical plantsAnn. Occup. Hyg., 1986, 30 (2), 241–247.
7.
SchroderR.PeekenH.Bestimmung der Leckage von Gleitringdichtungen. In Proceedings of the Pump Congress Karlsruhe, Fachgemeinschaft in VDMA, October 1992.
8.
API 610 Centrifugal pumps for general refinery service, 7th edition, 1989 (American Petroleum Institute, New York).
9.
LymerA.An engineering approach to the selection and application of mechanical seals. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference onFluid Sealing, 1969 (American Society of Lubrication Engineers, New York).
10.
WallaceN. M.DavidJ.The design and application of seals for light hydrocarbon service. In Proceedings of the Ninth Technical Conference of the British Pump Manufacturers’ Association, 1985.
11.
Summers-SmithJ. D.Mechanical Seal Practice for Improved Performance, 1988 (Mechanical Engineering Publications, London).
12.
MayerE.Mechanical Seals, 1977, p. 77 (Butterworth, London).
13.
KittlemanT.PopeM.AdamsW.CMA/STLE pump seal mass emissions study. In Proceedings of the 11th International Pump Users’ Symposium, 1994.
14.
NauB. S.Mechanical seal face materials, Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part J, Journal of Engineering Tribology, 1997, 211 (J3), 165–183.
BowdenP. E.Cost effective emission control—the European experience. In Proceedings of the European Conference onControlling Fugitive Emissions from Valves, Pumps and Flanges, 1995 (European Sealing Association, Antwerp).
17.
BowdenP. E.Practical experience in mechanical sealing to meet European emission regulations. In Proceedings of the 14th International Technical Conference of the British Pump Manufacturers’ Association, 1995.
18.
WasserJ. R.SailerR.WarnerG.Design and development of gas lubricated seals for pumps. In Proceedings of the 11th International Pump Users’ Symposium, 1994.
19.
MeckK. D.Performance and Reliability Improvements with PPG Gas Seal Technology, 1997 (Achema, Frankfurt).
20.
Rule 1173 Fugitive Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds, 1989 (South Coast Air Quality Management District).
