The paper focuses on the development and results of a numerical model to evaluate the fluid transfer behaviour for non-Newtonian fluids in a rough soft elastohydrodynamic nip contact. The solution required coupling of the fluid and elastomer regimes, with a multi-gridding technique to facilitate the high mesh densities required to capture the rough surface representation. The non-Newtonian fluid behaviour was modelled using a power-law model. The study evaluated circumferential and longitudinal roughness forms. The introduction of longitudinal roughness introduced significant shear in the nip with the resultant large change to the viscosity profile. This also removed the stagnation point in the centre of the nip. The longitudinal roughness had a large impact on the film thickness and flow through the nip while the circumferential affected the local performance of the nip but not its overall pumping capacity.
KistlerS. F.SchweizerP. M.Liquid Film Coating, 1997 (Chapman and Hall, London).
2.
DowsonD.EhretP.Past, present and future studies in elastohydrodynamicsProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part J: J. Engineering Tribology, 1999, 213 (J5), 317–333.
3.
HannahM.Contact stress and deformation in a thin elastic layerQ. J. Mechanics Appl. Math., 1951, 4, 94–105.
4.
ParishD. J.Apparent slip between metal and rubber covered pressure rollersBr. J. Appl. Math., 1958, 9, 428–433.
5.
MillerR. D. W.Some effects of compressibility on the indentation of a thin elastic layer by a smooth rigid cylinderAppl. Scient. Res., 1966, 16, 405–424.
6.
JaffarM. J.Determination of surface deformation of a bonded elastic layer indented by a rigid cylinder using Chebyshev series methodWear, 1993, 170, 291–294.
7.
HiggsonG. R.The theoretical effects of elastic deformation of the bearing liner on journal bearing performanceProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1965-1966, 180, 31–38.
8.
BennettJ.HigginsonG. R.Hydrodynamic lubrication of soft solidsProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 1970, 12, 218–222.
9.
HookeC. J.O'DonoghueJ. P.Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of soft, highly deformed contactsProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 1972, 14, 34–48.
10.
GuptaP. K.On the heavily loaded elastohydrodynamic contacts of layered solidsTrans. ASME, J. Lubric. Technol., 1976, 98, 367–374.
11.
CudworthC. J.Finite element solution of the elastohydrodynamic lubrication of a compliant surface in pure sliding.In Proceedings of the 5th Leeds—Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Leeds, September 1978, 1979 (Mechanical Engineering Publications, London).
12.
HookeC. J.The elastohydrodynamic lubrication of a cylinder on an elastomeric layerWear, 1986, 111, 83–99.
13.
MacPheeJ.ShiehJ.HamrockB. J.The application of elastohydrodynamic lubrication theory to the prediction of conditions existing in lithographic printing press roller nipsAdv. Printing Sci. Technol., 1992, 21, 242–276.
14.
BohanM. F. J.LimC. H.KorochkinaT. V.ClaypoleT. C.GethinD. T.RoylanceB. J.An investigation of the hydrodynamic and mechanical behaviour of a soft nip in rolling contactProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part J: J. Engineering Tribology, 1997, 211 (J1), 37–50.
15.
CarvalhoM. S.ScrivenL. E.Deformable roller coating flows: Steady state and linear perturbation analysisJ. Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 339, 143–172.
16.
JacobsonB. O.HamrockB. J.Non-Newtonian fluid model incorporated into elastohydrodynamic lubrication of rectangular contactsTrans. ASME, J. Lubric. Technol., 1984, 106, 275–284.
17.
LimC. H.BohanM. F. J.ClaypoleT. C.GethinD. T.RoylanceB. J.A finite element investigation into a soft rolling contact supplied by a non-Newtonian inkJ. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 1996, 29, 1894–1903.
18.
BohanM. F. J.FoxI. J.ClaypoleT. C.GethinD. T.Numerical modelling of elastohydrodynamic lubrication in soft contacts using non-Newtonian fluidsInt. J. Numer. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow, 12 (4).
19.
PatirN.ChengH. S.An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubricationTrans. ASME, J. Lubric. Technol., 1978, 100, 12–17.
20.
LundeL.TØnderK.Numerical simulation of the effects of three-dimensional roughness on hydrodynamic lubrication: Correlation coefficientsTrans. ASME, J. Lubric. Technol., 1997, 119, 315–322.
21.
DowsonD.JinZ. M.Microelastohydro-dynamic lubrication of low-elastic modulus solids on rigid substratesJ. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 1992, 25, A116-A123.
22.
DowsonD.JinZ. M.A full numerical solution to the problem of microelastohydrodynamic lubrication of a stationary compliant wavy layered surface firmly bonded to a rigid substrate with particular reference to human synovial jointsProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1992, 206, 185–193.
23.
HookeC. J.The behaviour of low amplitude surface roughness under line contactsProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part J: J. Engineering Tribology, 1999, 213, 275–286.
24.
GreenwoodJ. A.Transverse roughness in elastohydrodynamic lubricationProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part J: J. Engineering Tribology, 1999, 213, 383–396.
25.
HookeC. J.The behaviour of low amplitude surface roughness under line contacts: Non Newtonian fluidsProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part J: J. Engineering Tribology, 2000, 214, 253–265.
26.
JaffarM. J.A numerical solution for a soft line elastohydrodynamic lubrication contact problem with sinusoidal roughness using the Chebyshev polynomials, Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 2000, 214 (C5), 711–718.
27.
BohanM. F. J.ClaypoleT. C.GethinD. T.The application of roughness model to a soft EHL contactInt. J. Numer. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow, 12 (4).
28.
BrebbiaC. A.DominguezJ.Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course, 1989 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
29.
DowsonD.A generalised Reynolds equation for fluid film lubricationInt. J. Mech. Engng Sci., 1962, 4, 159–170.
30.
WaltersK.Rheometry, 1975 (Chapman and Hall, London).
BohanM. F. J.ClaypoleT. C.GethinD. T.Roughness modelling of soft elastohydrodynamic lubrication contacts. In Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2001.
33.
DowsonD.HigginsonG. R.A numerical solution to the elastohydrodynamic problemJ. Mech. Engng Sci., 1959, 1, 6–15.
34.
BanerjeeP. K.ButterfieldR.Boundary Element Method in Engineering Science, 1981 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
