In this paper, residual sinks are used in bond graph model-based quantitative fault detection for the coupling of a model of a faultless process engineering system to a bond graph model of the faulty system. By this way, integral causality can be used as the preferred computational causality in both models. There is no need for numerical differentiation. Furthermore, unknown variables do not need to be eliminated from power continuity equations in order to obtain analytical redundancy relations (ARRs) in symbolic form. Residuals indicating faults are computed numerically as components of a descriptor vector of a differential algebraic equation system derived from the coupled bond graphs. The presented bond graph approach especially aims at models with non-linearities that make it cumbersome or even impossible to derive ARRs from model equations by elimination of unknown variables. For illustration, the approach is applied to a non-controlled as well as to a controlled hydraulic two-tank system. Finally, it is shown that not only the numerical computation of residuals but also the simultaneous numerical computation of their sensitivities with respect to a parameter can be supported by bond graph modelling.
IsermannR.‘Model-based fault-detection and diagnosis - status and applications.’Ann. Rev. Control29 (2005): 71–85
2.
KarnoppD. C.MargolisD. L.RosenbergR. C.System dynamics - modeling and simulation of mechatronic systems, fourth edition. (Wiley2005).
3.
BorutzkyW.Bond graphs - a methodology for modelling multidisciplinary dynamic systems, (SCS Publishing House, Erlangen, Germany2004).
4.
Dauphin-TanguyG.Les bond graphs, (Hermes Science Europe Ltd, Paris, France2000).
5.
MukherjeeA.KarmakarR.Modelling and simulation of engineering systems through bondgraphs, (Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, India.2000)
6.
GawthropP.SmithL.Metamodelling: bond graphs and dynamic systems, (Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead, UK.1996)
7.
MukherjeeA.KarmakarR.SamantarayA. K.Bond graph in modeling, simulation and fault identification, (I.K. International Publishing House, New Delhi, India.2006)
8.
ThomaJ.BouamamaB. O.Modeling and simulation in thermal and chemical engineering (a bond graph approach), (Springer-Verlag, Berlin.2000)
9.
HenyC.SimancaD.DelgadoM.‘Pseudo-bond graph model and simulation of a continuous stirred tank reactor.’J. Franklin Inst.337 (2000): 21–42
10.
BouamamaB. O.MedjaherK.SamantarayA. K.StaroswieckiM.‘Supervision of an industrial steam generator. Part I: Bond graph modelling.’Control Engng Pract.14 (1) (2006): 71–83
11.
MedjaherK.SamantarayA. K.BouamamaB. O.StaroswieckiM.‘Supervision of an industrial steam generator. Part II: Online implementation.’Control Engng Pract.14 (1) (2006): 85–96
12.
FeenstraP. J.MostermanP. J.BiswasG.BreedveldP. C.‘Bond graph modeling procedures for fault detection and isolation of complex flow processes.’In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond graph modeling (Eds GrandaJ. J.Dauphin-TanguyG.), Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 7-11 January 2001, pp. 77–82 (SCS Publishing).
13.
BouamamaB. O.SamantarayA. K.StaroswieckiM.Dauphin-TanguyG.‘Derivation of constraint relations from bond graph models for fault detection and isolation.’In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond graph modeling, (Eds GrandaJ. J.CellierF.), Orlando, Florida, USA, 19-23 January 2003, pp. 104–109. (SCS Publishing).
14.
SiaK.NaamaneA.‘Bond graph: A suitable tool for component fault diagnosis.’In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond graph modeling (Eds GrandaJ. J.CellierF.), Orlando, Florida, USA, 19–23 January 2003, pp. 89–103 (SCS Publishing).
15.
MedjaherK.SamantarayA. K.BouamamaB. O.‘Diagnostic bond graphs for direct residual evaluation.’In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond graph modeling (Eds GrandaJ. J.CellierF.), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 23–27 January 2005, pp. 307–312 (SCS Publishing).
16.
GhoshalS. K.SamantarayA. K.MukherjeeA.‘Improvements to single fault isolation using estimated parameters.’In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond graph modeling (Eds GrandaJ. J.CellierF.), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 23–27 January 2005, pp. 301–306 (SCS Publishing).
17.
SamantarayA. K.MedjaherK.BouamamaB. O.StaroswieckiM.Dauphin-TanguyG.‘Diagnostic bond graphs for online fault detection and isolation.’Simul. Modelling Pract. Theory14 (3) (2006): 237–262
18.
BorutzkyW.‘Residual bond graph sinks for numerical evaluation of analytical redundancy relations in model based single fault detection and isolation.’In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Modelling and simulation, Sankt Augustin, Germany, 28-31 May 2006, pp. 166–172.
19.
GhoshalS. K.‘Model-based fault diagnosis and accommodation using analytical redundancy: a bond graph approach.’ Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, 2006.
20.
GertlerJ.Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems. (Marcel Dekker, New York1998)
21.
BlankeM.KinnaertM.LunzeJ.StaroswieckiM.Diagnosis and fault-tolerant control, (Springer Verlag, Berlin.2003)
TaginaM.CassarJ. P.Dauphin-TanguyG.StaroswieckiM.‘Monitoring of systems modelled by bond-graphs.’In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond graph modeling and simulation (Eds GrandaJ. J.CellierF.), Las Vegas, USA, 15-18 January 1995, pp. 275–280 (SCS Publishing).
24.
StaroswieckiM.Comtet-VargaG.‘Analytical redundancy relations for fault detection and isolation in algebraic dynamic systems.’Automatica37 (2001): 687–699
25.
BorutzkyW.CellierF. E.‘Tearing algebraic loops in bond graphs.’Trans. SCS13 (2) (1996): 102–115
26.
BorutzkyW.‘Supporting the generation of a state space model by adding tearing information to the bond graph.’Simul. Pract. Theory7 (5/6) (1999): 419–438
27.
Scilab Consortium. Scilab, available from: http://www.scilab.org (accessed Nov. 2008).
BosA. M.‘Modelling multibody systems in terms of multibond graphs with application to a motorcycle.’ University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1986.
30.
FélezJ.VeraC.JoséI. S.CachoR.‘BONDYN: A bond graph based simulation program for multibody systems.’Trans. ASME, J. Dyn. Sys., Measmt. Control112 (1990): 717–727
31.
KarnoppD.‘Lagrange's equations for complex bond graph systems.’Trans. ASME, J. Dyn. Sys., Measmt. Control99 (4) (1977): 300–306
32.
GawthropP.SmithL.‘Causal augmentation of bond graphs with algebraic loops.’J. Franklin Inst.329 (1992): 291–303
33.
BrenanK. E.CampbellS. L.PetzoldL. R.Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations, (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.1996)
34.
PantelidesC. C.‘The consistent initialization of differential-algebraic systems.’SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput.9 (1988): 213–231
35.
CabanellasJ. M.FélezJ.VeraC.‘A formulation of the sensitivity analysis for dynamic systems optimization based on pseudo bond graphs.’In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bond graph modeling and simulation, 1995, pp. 135–144 (SCS Publishing).
36.
GawthropP.‘Sensitivity bond graphs.’J. Franklin Inst.337 (2000): 907–922
37.
KamC. S.Dauphin-TanguyG.‘Sensitivity function determination on a bond graph model.’In Proceedings of the 13th European Simulation Symposium: Simulation in industry, Marseille, France, 18-20 October 2001, pp. 735–739 (SCS Publishing).
38.
BorutzkyW.GrandaJ.‘Bond graph based frequency domain sensitivity analysis of multidisciplinary systems.’Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering216 (I1) (2002): 85–99
39.
SamantarayA. K.GhoshalS. K.‘Sensitivity bond graph approach to multiple fault isolation through parameter estimation.’Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering221 (I4) (2007): 577–587
40.
DjeziriM. A.MerzoukiR.BouamamaB. O.Dauphin-TanguyG.‘Bond graph model based for robust fault diagnosis.’ In Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference, New York City, USA, 11-13 July 2007, pp. 3017–3022 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ).
