Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In order to manufacture high-quality products it is necessary to regularly monitor the performance of the control loops that regulate the quality variables of interest. This paper describes a design scheme of performance-adaptive controllers which are based on the above control strategy. According to the proposed control scheme, the output prediction error is monitored regularly and system identification is initiated if this error exceeds a user-defined threshold. Subsequently proportional—integral—derivative (PID) parameters are updated for the new model. Optimal PID parameters are calculated based on the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) trade-off curve obtained for the reidentified process model. The behaviour of the proposed control scheme is numerically evaluated by some simulation examples.

Keywords

PID control self-tuning control control performance assessment stochastic systems process control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Åström

K. J.

Borisson

Ljung

Wittenmark

Theory and applications of self-tuning regulators. Automatica, 1997, 13(5), 457–476.

Clarke

D. W.

Gawthrop

P. J.

Self-tuning control. IEE Proc. Control Theory Applic., 1979, 26(6), 633–640.

Wellstead

P. E.

Pranger

Zanker

Pole-assignment self-tuning regulator. IEE Proc. Control Theory Applic., 1979, 126(8), 781–787.

Landau

I. D.

Lazano

Unification of discrete time explicit model reference adaptive control designs. Automatica, 1981, 17(4), 593–611.

Clarke

D. W.

Mohtadi

Tuffs

P. S.

Generalized predictive control. Automatica, 1987, 23(6), 859–875.

Wellstead

P. E.

Zarrop

M. B.

Self-tuning systems, control and signal processing, 1991 (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester).

Yamamoto

Shah

S. L.

Design and experimental evaluation of a multivariable self-tuning PID controller. IEE Proc. Control Theory Applic., 2004, 151(5), 645–652.

McIntosh

A. R.

Fisher

D. G.

Shah

S. L.

Performance adaptive control, general structure and a case study. J. Process Control, 1992, 2(4), 213–221.

Ohnishi

Shah

S. L.

Performance-driven adaptive PID controller design: Theory and experimental evaluation. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Dynamics and control of process systems, Cancun, Maxico, 2007, pp. 433–438 (Elsevier, St Louis).

10.

Harris

T. J.

Assessment of closed loop performance. Can. J. Chem. Engng, 1989, 67, 856–861.

11.

Desborough

L. D.

Harris

T. J.

Performance assessment measures for univariate feedback control. Can. J. Chem. Engng, 1992, 70, 1186–1197.

12.

Harris

T. J.

Seppala

C. T.

Desborough

L. D.

A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems. J. Process Control, 1999, 9, 1–17.

13.

Huang

Shah

S. L.

Performance assessment of control loops: theory and applications, 1999 (Springer-Verlag, London).

14.

Grimble

M. J.

Controller performance benchmarking and tuning using generalized minimum variance control. Automatica, 2002, 38, 2111–2119.

15.

Huang

A pragmatic approach towards assessment of control loop performance. Int. J. Adap. Control Signal Process., 2003, 17, 589–608.

16.

Miller

Shah

Wood

Adaptive predictive control employing on-line time delay estimation. In Proceedings of ISA, New Orleans, 1995, pp. 857–864.

17.

Ziegler

J. G.

Nichols

N. B.

Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. ASME, 1942, 64(8), 759–768.

Design of a performance-adaptive proportional—integral—derivative controller for stochastic systems

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References