In Part 1, a graphical and physical approach to the inversion of dynamic systems using the bond graph representation was presented. Two applications of inverse bond graph models are presented in this paper: the sizing of actuators for the control of a given system with pre-defined output performance specifications and the zero-dynamics analysis of a system from a physical viewpoint.
PotkonjakV.JaksicN.Contribution to a computer-aided choice of dc motors for manipulation robots. Robotica, 1986, 4, 37–41.
2.
VukobratovicM.KaticD.PotkonjakV.Computer-assisted choice of electrohydraulic servosystems for manipulation robots using complete mathematical models. Mech. Mach. Theory, 1987, 22 (5), 431–439.
3.
SlotineJ.-J. E.LiW.Applied Nonlinear Control, 1991 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
4.
MiuD. K.Physical interpretation of transfer function zeros for simple control systems with flexibilities. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measmt Control, 1991, 113, 419–424.
5.
IsidoriA.Nonlinear Control Systems, 1989 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
6.
WuS.-T.Youcef-ToumiK.On the relative degrees and zero dynamics from physical system modeling. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measmt Control, 1995, 117, 205–217.
7.
HuangS. Y.Youcef-ToumiK.Zero dynamics from bond graph models. Part I: SISO systems. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measmt Control, 1999, 121, 10–17.
8.
HuangS. Y.Youcef-ToumiK.Zero dynamics from bond graph models. Part II: MIMO systems. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measmt Control, 1999, 121, 18–26.
9.
SueurC.Dauphin-TanguyG.Bond graph approach for structural analysis of MIMO linear systems. J. Franklin Inst., 1991, 328 (1), 55–70.
10.
RahmaniA.SueurC.Dauphin-TanguyG.Pole assignment for systems modelled by bond graph. J. Franklin Inst., 1994, 331 (3), 229–314.
11.
BertrandJ. M.SueurC.Dauphin-TanguyG.Bond graph for modeling and control: Structural analysis tools for the design of input-output decoupling state feedbacks. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Bond Graph Modelling and Simulation, Simulation Series Vol. 29 (Eds GrandaJ. J.Dauphin-TanguyG.), 1997, pp. 103–108 (Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, California).
12.
WonhamW. M.Linear Multivariable Control: A Geometric Approach, 3rd edition, 1985 (Springer-Verlag, New York).
13.
GawthropP. J.SmithL.Metamodelling: Bond Graphs and Dynamic Systems, 1996 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
14.
NgwompoR. F.GawthropP. J.Bond graph based simulation of nonlinear inverse systems using physical performance specifications. J. Franklin Inst., 1999, 336 (8), 1225–1247.
15.
GawthropP. J.Control system configuration: In version and bicausal bond graphs. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference onBond Graph Modelling and Simulation, Simulation Series Vol. 29 (Eds GrandaJ. J.Dauphin-TanguyG.), 1997, pp. 97–102 (Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, California).
16.
SerajiH.Minimal inversion, command matching and disturbance decoupling in multivariable systems. Int. J. Control, 1989, 49 (6), 2093–2121.
17.
BrownF. T.Direct application of the loop rule to bond graphs. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measmt Control, 1972, 94 (3), 253–261.
