This paper describes tests performed on a laser scanner system to assess the
feasibility of H∞ control and generalized predictive
control design techniques in achieving a required performance in a trajectory
following problem. The two methods are compared with respect to achieved scan
times, tracking errors and overshooting. The results are illustrated on a
simulation example.
MarshallG. F.Scanner refinements inspire new users.
Laser Focus World, June 1994,
2–6.
2.
ZhouK.DoyleJ. C.GloverK.Robust and Optimal Control, 1996
(Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey).
3.
Armstrong-HelouvryB.DupontP.Canudas de WitC.A survey of models, analysis tools and compensation methods for
the control of machines with friction.
Automatics, 1994, 30
(7),
1083–1138.
4.
Canudas de WitC.OlssonH.ÅströmK. J.LischinskyP.A new model for control of systems with friction.
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, March 1995,
40 (3),
419–425.
5.
DoyleJ.GloverK.KhargonekarP.FrancisB. A.State-space solutions to standard H2
and H∞ control problems.
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1989,
34,
831–847.
6.
LimebeerD. J. N.KasenallyE. M.PerkinsJ. D.On the design of robust two degrees of freedom
controllers. Automatica, 1993,
29 (1),
157–168.
7.
GrimbleM. J.Minimization of a combined H∞ and LQG
cost function for a two-degrees-of-freedom control design.
Automatica, 1989, 25
(4),
635–638.
8.
OrdysA. W.ClarkeD. W.A state-space description of GPC controllers.
Int. J. Syst. Sci., 1993, 23
(2),
1727–1744.
