An evolutionary approach for modern robust control oriented system identification and model reduction in the frequency domain is proposed. The technique provides both an optimized nominal model and a ‘worst-case’ additive or multiplicative uncertainty bounding function which is compatible with robust control design methodologies. In addition, the evolutionary approach is applicable to both continuous- and discrete-time systems without the need for linear parametrization or a confined problem domain for deterministic convex optimization. The proposed method is validated against a laboratory multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) test rig and benchmark problems, which show a higher fitting accuracy and provides a tighter L∞ error bound than existing methods in the literature do.
SmithR. S.DoyleJ. C.Towards a methodology for robust parameter identification. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Diego, California, 1990, pp. 2395–2399.
2.
HelmickiA.JacobsonC.NettC.Control oriented system identification: A worst-case/deterministic approach inH∞. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1991, 36 (10), 1163–1176.
3.
ZhouT.KimuraH.MinimalH∞-norm of transfer functions consistent with prescribed finite input-output data. In Proceedings of SICE, Kumamoto, Japan, 1992, pp. 1079–1082.
4.
GuG.KhargonekarP. P.Linear and nonlinear algorithms for identification in H∞ with error bounds. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1992, 37 (7), 953–963.
5.
HelmickiA.JacobsonC.NettC.Least squares methods for H∞ control oriented system identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1993, 38 (5), 819–826.
6.
KosutR. L.LauM. K.BoydS. P.Set-membership identification of systems with parametric and non-parametric uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1992, 37 (7), 929–941.
7.
ZhouT.KimuraH.Time domain identification for robust control. Systems Control Lett., 1993, 20 (3), 167–173.
8.
SugieT.TanaiY.L∞ identification in the frequency domain based on the set-membership approach. In Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1995, Vol. 3, pp. 3016–3021.
9.
EnnsD.Model reduction for control system design. PhD thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, 1984.
10.
Al-SaggafU. M.FranklinG. F.Model reduction via balanced realizations: An extension and frequency weighting techniques. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1988, 33 (7), 687–692.
11.
ZhouK.Frequency-weighted L∞ norm and optimal Hankel norm model reduction. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1995, 40 (10), 1687–1699.
12.
TanK. C.LiY.L∞ identification and model reduction using a learning genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Control, University of Exeter, 1996, pp. 1125–1130.
13.
TanK. C.GongM. R.LiY.Evolutionary linearisation in the frequency domain. Electronics Lett., 1996, 32 (1), 74–76.
14.
TanK. C.LiY.Evolutionary system identification in the time-domain. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part I, Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 1997, 211 (I5), 319–323.
15.
LiY.TanK. C.GongM. R.Global structure evolution and local parameter learning for control system model reductions. In Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering Applications (Eds DasguptaD.MichalewiczZ.), 1996 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
16.
DoyleJ. C.FrancisB.TannenbaumA.Feedback Control Theory, 1992 (Macmillan, London).
