This paper presents a post-processing analysis that combines several statistical tools to validate experimental results in a particle image velocimetry analysis on unsteady flows in the turbomachinery field. The method was developed in three steps: verification of the number of acquired images, verification of the meaningfulness of the velocity averages, and identification of the zones characterized by the greatest error on the average estimation. The statistical approach allows one to identify the possible error sources, discriminating between experimental problems due to the test rig, the turbulent nature of the flow, and structures unidentifiable by a single frequency.
SuttonM. M.WoltersW. J.PetersW. H.RansonW. H.MacneillS. R., ‘Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method’Opt. Eng.1 (1983): 113–139.
2.
AdrianR. J.YaoC. S., ‘Development of pulsed laser velocimetry for measurement of fluid flow’ In Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Turbulence, Rolla, Michigan, USA, 1984 pp. 170–186.
3.
KeaneR. D.AdrianR. J., ‘Theory of cross correlation analysis of PIV images’Appl. Sci. Res.49 (1992): 191–215.
FocautJ. M.CarlierJ.StanislasM., ‘Some considerations on the accuracy and frequency response of some derivative filters applied to particle image velocimetry vector fields’Meas. Sci. Technol.13 (2002): 1058–1071.
6.
MeinhartC. D.WerelyS. T.SantiagoJ. G., ‘A PIV algorithm for estimating time-averaged velocity fields’J. Fluids Eng.122 (2000): 285–289.
7.
SchramC.RiethmullerM. L., ‘Measurement of vortex ring characteristics during pairing in a forced subsonic air jet’Expl Fluids33 (2002): 879–888.
8.
GeveciM.OshkaiP.RockwellD.LinJ.-C.PollackM., ‘Imaging of the self-excited oscillation of flow past a cavity during generation of a flow tone’J. Fluid Struct.18 (2003): 665–694.
9.
PerrinR.CidE.CazinS.SevrainA.BrazaM.MoradeiF.HarranG., ‘Phase-averaged measurements of the turbulence properties in the near wake of a circular cylinder at high Reynolds number by 2C-PIV and 3C-PIV’Expl Fluids42 (2007): 93–109.
10.
RaffelM.KompenhansJ.WernertP., ‘Investigation of the unsteady flow velocity field above an airfoil pitching under deep dynamic stall conditions’Expl Fluids19 (1995): 103–111.
11.
RaffelM.SeelhorstU.WillertC.VollmersH.BütefischK. A.KompenhansJ., ‘Measurements of vortical structures on a helicopter rotor model in a wind tunnel by LDV and PIV’ In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 1996 pp. 14.3.1–14.3.6.
12.
UllumU.SchmidtJ. J.LarsenP. S.McCluskeyD. R., ‘Temporal evolution of the perturbed and unperturbed flow behind a fence: PIV analysis and comparison with LDA data’ In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Laser anemometry and applications, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1997 pp. 809–816.
13.
VogtA.BaumannP.GharibM.KompenhansJ., ‘Investigations of a wing tip vortex in air by means of DPIV’ AIAA paper 96-2254, 1996.
14.
YaoC.PashalK., ‘PIV measurements of airfoil wake-flow turbulence statistics and turbulent structures’ AIAA paper 94-0085, 1994.
15.
SchramC.RiethmullerM. L., ‘Evolution of vortex ring characteristics during pairing in an acoustically excited jet using stroboscopic particle image velocimetry’ In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Particle image velocimetry, Gottingen, 17–19 September 2001, paper 1157.
16.
CavazziniG.DazinA.PavesiG.DupontP.CoudertS.ArdizzonG.CaignaertG.BoisG., ‘Rotating instabilities in a radial vaneless diffuser. Part II: Comparison of experimental and numerical results’ In Proceedings of the ETC 8, 8th Conference on Turbomachinery, fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, Graz, Austria, 23–27 March 2009.
17.
DupontP.SchneiderT.CaignaertG.BoisG., ‘Rotor—stator interactions in a vaned diffuser radial flow pump’ In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Pumping machinery, ASME, Houston, USA, 19–23 June 2005, FEDSM2005-69038.
18.
WuibautG.DupontP.BoisG.CaignaertG.StanislasM., ‘Analysis of flow velocities within the impeller and the vaneless diffuser of a radial flow pump’Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy215A6 (2001): 801–808.DOI: 10.1243/0957650011538938.
19.
WuibautG.DupontP.BoisG.CaignaertG.StanislasM., ‘PIV measurements in the impeller and the vaneless diffuser of a radial flow pump in design and off design operating conditions’J. Fluid Eng. Trans. ASME124 (2002): 791–797.
20.
WuibautG.BoisG.CaignaertG.DupontP.StanislasM., ‘Experimental analysis of interactions between the impeller and the vaned diffuser of a radial flow pump’ In Proceedings of the IAHR Symposium, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland, 9–12 September 2002, paper GU03.
21.
WernertP.KoerberG.WietrichF.RaffelM.KompenhansJ., ‘Demonstration by PIV of the non-reproducibility of the flow field around an airfoil pitching under deep dynamic stall conditions and consequences thereof’Aerosp. Sci. Technol.2 (1997): 125–135.
22.
HeinzO.IlyushinB.MarkovicD., ‘Application of a PDF method for the statistical processing of experimental data’Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow25 (2004): 864–874.
23.
WuibautG.DupontP.CaignaertG.StanislasM., ‘Experimental analysis of velocities in the outlet part of a radial flow pump impeller and the vaneless diffuser using particle image velocimetry’ In Proceedings of the XX IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic machinery and systems, Charlotte, USA, 6–9 August 2000.
24.
CaignaertG.WuibautG.DupontP.BoisG., ‘Rotor—stator interactions in a vaned diffuser radial flow pump’ In Proceedings of the XXII IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic machinery and systems, Stockholm, Sweden, 29 June–2 July 2004, paper B5-2.
25.
CavazziniG.PavesiG.ArdizzonG.DupontP.CoudertS.CaignaertG.BoisG., ‘Analysis of the rotor—stator interaction in a radial flow pump’Houille Blanche5 (2009): 141–151.
26.
WernertP.FavierD., ‘Considerations about the phase-averaging method with application to ELDV and PIV measurements over pitching airfoils’Expl Fluids27 (1999): 473–483.
27.
BowmanA. W.AzzaliniA., Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: The kernel approach with S-plus illustrations (New York: Oxford University Press1997).
28.
ChristensenK. T., ‘The influence of peak-locking errors on turbulence statistics computed from PIV ensembles’Expl Fluids36 (2004): 484–497.
29.
LemeshkoB. Y.LemeshkoS. B.PostovalovS. N., ‘The power of goodness of fit tests for close alternatives’Meas. Tech.502 (2007): 132–141.
30.
MontgomeryD. C.RungerG. C., Applied statistics and probability for engineers (New York: John Wiley & Sons2003).
