Contributions of self-absorption and soot on radiation heat transfer in a laminar methane

Abstract

A numerical study is performed to understand the contributions of self-absorption and soot radiation in a laminar methane—air diffusion flame. Simplified models have been adopted for the combustion and soot chemistry. A gray radiation model was developed using the first-order moment method to evaluate the emission and absorption of radiation. The absorption coefficient is determined considering (i) the influence of the gaseous (CH₄, CO₂, H₂O, and CO) species and soot (taken as the benchmark results for the current study), and (ii) only the influence of the gaseous species. A comparison of the two results identifies the contribution of soot on radiation. An optically thin radiation model is also used to estimate the contribution of self-absorption in the flame. Finally, a radiatively adiabatic treatment in the model is employed to account the total effect of radiation. The effects of each contribution have been ascertained by looking at the variation in the radiative heat loss and the resulting temperature distribution of the flame. Differences in the soot volume fraction and thermal NO formation with the different radiative treatments have also been studied.

Radiation is found to have very important role on the overall flame structure as well as on the soot formation and NO emission in a methane—air diffusion flame. Neglecting soot in the calculation of radiation underpredicts the radiative heat loss from the flame, particularly in the soot-laden region. Though the effect on the macroscopic flame shape is marginal, the peak temperature difference at the flame tip is found to be substantial. On the contrary, the predictions using the optically thin approximation are very close to the benchmark results.

Keywords

diffusion flame radiation self-absorption soot simplified chemistry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

L. Y.

Zhou

L. X.

Zhang

Large eddy simulation of a swirling diffusion flame using a SOM SGS combustion model

Numer. Heat Transf. B, 2006, 50, 41–58.

Yapici

Kayatas

Albayrak

Basturk

Numerical calculation of local entropy generation in a methane-air burner

Energy Convers Manage., 2005, 46, 1885–1919.

Daguse

Croonenbroek

Rolon

J. C.

Darabiha

Soufiani

Study of radiative effects on laminar counterflow H₂/O₂/N₂ diffusion flames. Combust. Flame, 1996, 106, 271–287.

Bedir

T'ien

J. S.

Lee

H. S.

Comparison of different radiation treatments for a one-dimensional diffusion flame. Combust. Theory Model., 1997, 1, 395–404.

Vranos

Hall

R. J.

Influence of radiative loss on nitric oxide formation in counterflow diffusion flames at high pressure. Combust. Flame, 1993, 93, 230–238.

Smooke

M. D.

Ern

Tanoff

M. A.

Valdati

B. A.

Mohammed

R. K.

Marran

D. F.

Long

M. B.

Computational and experimental study of NO in an axisymmetric laminar diffusion flame. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1996, 26, 2161–2170.

Barlow

R. S.

Frank

J. H.

Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1998, 27, 1087–1095.

Sivathanu

Y. R.

Gore

J. P.

Effects of gas-band radiation on soot kinetics in laminar methane/air diffusion flames. Combust. Flame, 1997, 110, 256–263.

Smooke

M. D.

McEnally

C. S.

Pfefferle

L. D.

Hall

R. J.

Colket

M. B.

Computational and experimental study of soot formation in a co-flow laminar diffusion flame. Combust. Flame, 1999, 117, 117–139.

10.

Brookes

S. J.

Moss

J. B.

Predictions of soot and thermal radiation properties in confined turbulent jet diffusion flames. Combust. Flame, 1999, 116, 486–503.

11.

Kim

O. J.

Zhu

X. L.

Viskanta

Gore

J. P.

Third Asia-Pacific Conference on Combustion, Seoul, Korea, 2001, p. 368.

12.

Kim

O. J.

Gore

J. P.

Viskanta

Zhu

X. L.

Prediction of self-absorption in opposed flow diffusion and partially premixed flames using weighted sum of gray gases model (WSGGM)-based spectral model. Numer. Heat Trans. A, 2003, 44, 335–353.

13.

Zhu

X. L.

Gore

J. P.

Karpetis

A. N.

Barlow

R. S.

The effects of self-absorption of radiationon an opposed flaow partially premixed flame. Combust. Flame, 2002, 129, 342–345.

14.

Zhu

X. L.

Gore

J. P.

Radiation effects on combustion and pollutant emissions of high-pressure opposed flow methane/air diffusion flame. Combust. Flame, 2005, 141, 118–130.

15.

Wang

Haworth

D. C.

Turns

S. R.

Modest

M. F.

Interactions among soot, thermal radiation and NO_x emissions in oxygen-enriched turbulent nonpremixed flames: a computational fluid dynamics modeling study. Combust. Flame, 2005, 141, 170–179.

16.

Liu

Guo

Smallwood

G. J.

Effects of radiation model on the modeling of a laminar co-flow methane/air diffusion flame. Combust. Flame, 2004, 138, 136–154.

17.

Datta

Effects of gravity on structure and entropy generation of confined laminar diffusion flames. Int. J. Thermal Sci., 2005, 44, 429–440.

18.

DuPont

Pourkashanian

Williams

Modeling of process heaters fired by natural gas. J. Inst. Energy, 1993, 73, 20–27.

19.

Reid

R. C.

Prausnitz

J. M.

Poling

B. E.

The properties of gases & liquids, 1988 (McGraw-Hill, New York).

20.

Yeoh

G. H.

Yuen

R. K. K.

Chueng

S. C. P.

Kwok

W. K.

On modeling combustion, radiation and soot processes in compartment fires Build. Environ., 2003, 38, 771–785.

21.

Ozisik

M. N.

Radiative transfer and its interaction with conduction and convection, 1973 (Wiley, New York).

22.

Modest

F. M.

Radiative heat transfer, 1993 (McGraw-Hill, New York).

23.

Barlow

R. S.

Karpetis

A. N.

Frank

J. H.

Chen

J-Y.

Scalar profiles and NO-formation in laminar opposed flow partially premixed methane/air flames. Combust. Flame, 2001, 127, 2102–2118.

24.

Kent

J. H.

Honnery

D. R.

A soot formation rate map for a laminar ethylene diffusion flame. Combust. Flame, 1990, 79, 287–299.

25.

Syed

K. J.

Stewart

C. D.

Moss

J. B.

Modelling soot formation and thermal radiation in buoyant turbulent diffusion flames. Proc. Combust. Inst., 1990, 23, 1533–1539.

26.

Moss

J. B.

Stewart

C. D.

Young

K. J.

Modelling soot formation and burnout in a high temperature laminar diffusion flame burning under oxygen-enriched conditions. Combust. Flame, 1995, 101, 491–500.

27.

Santoro

R. J.

Yeh

T. T.

Horvathand

J. J.

Semerjian

H. G.

The transport and growth of soot particles in laminar diffusion flames. Combust. Sci. Technol., 1987, 53, 89–115.

28.

Lee

K. B.

Thring

M. W.

Beer

J. M.

On the rate of combustion of soot in a laminar soot flame. Combust. Flame, 1962, 6, 137–145.

29.

Kennedy

I. M.

Models of soot formation and oxidation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1997, 23 (2), 95–132.

30.

Borman

G. L.

Ragland

K. W.

Combustion engineering, 1998 (McGraw-Hill, Singapore).

31.

Hirt

C. W.

Cook

J. L.

Calculating three-dimensional flows around structures and over rough terrain. J. Comput. Phys., 1972, 10, 324–340.

32.

Mandal

B. K.

Sarkar

Datta

Numerical prediction of soot and NO formation in a confined laminar diffusion flame without and with air preheat. Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2006, 220, 473–486.

Contributions of self-absorption and soot on radiation heat transfer in a laminar methane—air diffusion flame

Abstract

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References