The paper presents a time domain model of a heaving buoy wave-energy converter and investigates the tuning problem in irregular seas. The tuning issue is addressed by employing both fixed (passive) and adaptive (active) power-take-off settings. The fixed power-take-off tuning approach includes models based on tuning the device natural frequency to either the energy frequency or peak frequency of the sea-state or a weighted average of several peak frequencies. The adaptive tuning approaches employ a sliding discrete Fourier transform frequency analysis, or a time-series analysis of the measured wave elevation and device velocity to estimate a localized dominant wave frequency and hence calculate power-take-off settings. The paper presents details of these tuning techniques by discussing issues related to the modelling, simulation, and predicted power captures for each method. A comparative study of each method along with practical implications of the results and recommendations are also presented.
KordeU. A.Efficient primary energy conversion in irregular waves. Ocean Eng., 1999, 26, 625–651.
3.
BudalK.FalnesJ.A resonant point absorber of ocean-wave power. Nature, 1975, 256, 478–479.
4.
FalnesJ.Optimum control of oscillation of wave-energy converters. Annex report B1: device fundamentals/hydrodynamics, wave energy converters: generic technical evaluation study, Commission of European Communities, contract no: JOU2-0003-DK, 1993.
5.
YavuzH.BradshawA.Power optimisation for 1 DOF WECs in regular seas. WPC Note 1, Engineering Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, June 2004.
6.
McCabeA. P.BradshawA.WiddenM. B.A time-domain model of a floating body using transforms. 6th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, University of Strathclyde, Glascow, UK, 2005.
7.
FalnesJ.Ocean waves and oscillating systems, 2002 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
8.
EidsmoenH.Tight-moored amplitude limited heaving buoy wave energy converter with phase control. Appl. Ocean Res., 1998, 20, 157–161.
9.
Edinburg Wave Power Project.Solo duck linear analysis. A report to the Wave Energy Steering Committee, Edinburg University, Edinburg, 1987.
10.
JacobsenE.LyonsR.The sliding DFT. IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 2003, 20(2), 74–80.
11.
ZhuY.ZhouH.GuH.WangZ.Fixed-point error analysis and efficient array processor design of two-dimensional sliding DFT. Signal Process., 1999, 73, 191–201.
12.
WistH. T.MyrhaugD.RueH.Statistical properties of successive wave heights and successive wave periods. Appl. Ocean Res., 2004, 26, 114–136.
13.
RodriguesG. R.SoaresC. G.Correlation between successive wave heights and periods in mixed sea states. Ocean Eng., 2001, 28, 1009–1030.
14.
BabaritA.DuclosG.ClementA. H.Comparison of latching control strategies for a heaving wave energy device in random sea. Appl. Ocean Res., 2004, 26, 227–238.
15.
KordeU. A.Latching control of deep water wave energy devices using an active reference. Ocean Engin., 2002, 29, 1343–1355.
16.
EidsmoenH.Simulation of a slack-moored heaving-buoy wave energy converter with phase control, 1996 (Division of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway).
17.
KordeU. A.Phase control of floating bodies from an on-board reference. Appli. Ocean Res., 2001, 23, 251–262.
18.
HendersonR.Design, simulation, and testing of a novel hydraulic power take-off system for the Pelamis wave energy converter. Renew. Energy, 2006, 31(2), 271–283.
19.
NolanG.CathainM. O.MurtaghJ.RingwoodJ. V.Modelling and simulation of the power take-off system for a hinge-barge wave energy converter. Fifth European Wave Energy Conference, University of Cork, Ireland, 38–45 September 2003.
20.
MATLAB version 7.0 (R14), SIMULINK version 6.1 (R14SP1), 2005 (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA) (01760-2098).
21.
CumminsW. F.The impulse response function and ship motions. Schiffstechnik, 1962, 9(47), 101–109.
22.
KorsmeyerF. T.BinghamH. B.NewmanJ. N.TiMIT - a panel method for transient wave-body interactions. Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1999.
23.
SpiegelM. R.Schaum's outline of theory and problems of Laplace transforms, 1965 (Schaum Publishing, New York, USA).
KristiansenE.EgelandO.Frequency-dependent added mass in models for controller design for wave motion damping. 6th IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and control of marine craft, September 2003, University of Girona, Spain, available from http://www.cesos.ntnu.no/mss/refs/papers/KristiansenEgeland.pdf.
26.
LeeC.-H.NewmanJ. N.Computation of wave effects using the panel method. In Numerical models in fluid-structure interaction (Ed. ChakrabartiS. K.), 2004, to be published 2005, (WIT Press, Southampton, UK) (ISBN 1-85312-837-6). Pre-print from: www.wamit.com/wit2003.pdf.
27.
DennisJ. E.Jr.SchnabelR. B.Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations, 1983 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA).
28.
DemirbilekZ.VincentC. L.Coastal engineering manual, 2002, (Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - Engineer Research and Development Center Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi) EM1110-2-1100, Part II, Chapter 1, Water wave mechanics, pp. II.1.59-II.1.98, available from http://chl.erdc.usace.army.mil/media/1/7/8/CEM_Part-II_Chap-1.pdf.
29.
PhelanR. M.Automatic control systems, 1977 (Cornell University Press Ithaca, New York).
30.
TuckerM. J.PittE. G.Waves in ocean engineering, vol. 5, 2001, Elsevier Ocean Engineering Book Series (Elsevier Science).
