This paper presents a two-dimensional two-objective procedure for minimizing dynamic loading and maximizing efficiency in multi-stage compressors. The procedure arises from the combination of an evolutionary algorithm and a CFD code, in which a sliding mesh technique and a time-dependent approach are implemented, enabling the study of unsteady rotor-stator interaction. The method is then applied to a two-stage compressor cascade (rotor-stator-rotor-stator). The results concerning the optimal set of geometrical parameters considered for optimization (axial distances between successive cascades, circumferential clocking between stators and between rotors) are finally presented and discussed.
GallusH. E.GrolliusH.LambertzJ.The influence of blade number ratio and blade row spacing on axial-flow compressor stator blade dynamic load and stage sound pressure level. ASME J. Turbomach., 1982, 104, 633–639.
2.
HsuS. T.WoA. M.Reduction of unsteady blade loading by beneficial use of vortical and potential disturbances in an axial compressor with rotor clocking. ASME J. Turbomach., 1998, 120, 705–713.
3.
CapeceV. R.FleeterS.Rotor blade unsteady aerodynamic gust response to inlet guide vane wake. ASME J. Turbomach., 1987, 109, 420–428.
4.
CizmasP.DorneyD. J.The influence of clocking on unsteady forces of compressor and turbine blades. Int. J. Turbo & Jet Eng., 2000, 17(2).
5.
ErdosJ. I.AlznerE.McNallyW.Numerical solution of periordic transonic flow through a fan stage. AIAA J., 1977, 115(11), 1559–1568.
6.
RaiM. M.Three-dimensional Navier-Stokes simulations of turbine rotor - stator interaction: Part I -methodology. J. Propuls., 1989, 5(3), 305–311.
7.
GilesM. B.Stator/rotor interaction in a transonic turbine. J. Propuls., 1990, 6(5), 621–627.
8.
ManwaringS. R.WislerD. C.Unsteady aerodynamic and gust response in compressors and turbines. ASME J. Turbomachi., 1993, 115, 724–740.
9.
HahC.PuterbaughS. L.CopenhaverW. W.Unsteady aerodynamic flow phenomena in a transonic compressor stage. AIAA paper no. 93–1868, 1993.
10.
ArnoneA.PaccianiR.IGV-rotor interaction analysis in a transonic compressor using the Navier-Stokes equations. ASME J. Turbomach., 1998, 120, 147–155.
11.
CizmasP.DorneyD. J.Parallel computation of turbine blade clocking. Int. J. Turbo & Jet Eng., 1999, 16(1), 49–60.
12.
HillewaertK.Van den BraembusscheR.Comparison of frozen rotor to unsteady calculations of incompressible turbomachinery flow. In Proceedings of the 5th National Congress over Theoretische en Toegepaste Mechanica, Belgium, 2000.
13.
ObayashiS.Pareto genetic algorithm for aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. In Genetic algorithms in engineering and computer science (Eds Quagliarella), 1997, 245–266. (Wiley, New York).
14.
PierretS.Three-dimensional blade design by means of an artificial neural network and Navier-Stokes solver. VKI Lecture Series 1999–02 on Turbomachinery blade design systems, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Chaussée de Waterloo, Belgium, 1999.
15.
KöllerU.MönigR.KüstersB.SchreiberH.-A.Development of advanced compressor airfoils for heavy-duty gas turbines - part I: Design and optimization. J. Turbomach., 2000, 122, 397–405.
16.
KüstersB.SchreiberH.-A.KöllerU.MönigR.Development of advanced compressor airfoils for heavy-duty gas turbines - part II: Experimental and theoretical analysis. J. Turbomachi., 2000, 122, 406–415.
17.
BeniniE.ToffoloA.Development of high-performance airfoils for axial flow compressors using evolutionary computation. AIAA J. Propuls. Power, 2002, 18(3), 544–554.
18.
BeniniE.ToffoloA.Systematic two-dimensional cascade optimization for axial flow pumps using genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Turbomachinery, Florence, 2001, 455–467.
19.
Gregory-SmithD. G.YanJ.CFD simulations of 3-dimensional flow in turbomachinery applications. ERCOFTAC Turbomachinery Flow Predictions VII Workshop, LaClusaz, France, 2000.
20.
ToffoloA.BeniniE.Genetic diversity as an objective in evolutionary algorithms. Evol. Compu., 2003, 11(2), 151–167.
21.
ToffoloA.BeniniE.A new pareto-like evaluation method for finding multiple global optima in evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2000), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 8–12 July 2000.
22.
SchwefelH.-P.Evolution and optimum seeking, 1995 (Wiley, New York).
23.
GoldbergD. E.Genetic algorithms for search, optimization and machine learning, 1989 (Addison Wesley, Reading, Ma).
