Probabilistic analysis methods are being increasingly applied in the orthopaedics and biomechanics literature to account for uncertainty and variability in subject geometries, properties of various structures, kinematics and joint loading, as well as uncertainty in implant alignment. As a complement to experiments, finite element modelling, and statistical analysis, probabilistic analysis provides a method of characterizing the potential impact of variability in parameters on performance. This paper presents an overview of probabilistic analysis and a review of biomechanics literature utilizing probabilistic methods in structural reliability, kinematics, joint mechanics, musculoskeletal modelling, and patient-specific representations. The aim of this review paper is to demonstrate the wide range of applications of probabilistic methods and to aid researchers and clinicians in better understanding probabilistic analyses.
NESSUS Theoretical Manual (Southwest Research InstituteSan Antonio, Texas2001)
6.
RihaD. S.MillwaterH. R.ThackerB. H.‘Probabilistic structural analysis using a general purpose finite element program.’Finite Elements in Analysis and Des.11 (3) (1992): 201–211
7.
RihaD. S.ThackerB. H.PlemingJ. B.WalkerJ. D.MullinS. A.WeissC. E.RodriguezE. A.LeslieP. O.‘Verification and validation for a penetration model using a deterministic and probabilistic design tool.’Int. J. Impact Engng33 (1–12) (2006): 681–690
8.
ThackerB. H.RihaD. S.FitchS. H. K.HuyseL. J.PlemingJ. B.‘Probabilistic engineering analysis using the NESSUS software.’Struct. Safety28 (1–2) (2006): 83–107
9.
RehS.BeleyJ.-D.MukherjeeS.KhorE. H.‘Probabilistic finite element analysis using ANSYS.’Struct. Safety28 (1–2) (2006): 17–43
10.
MelisM. E.ZaretskyE. V.AugustR.‘Probabilistic analysis of aircraft gas turbine disk life and reliability.’J. Propulsion and Power15 (5) (1999): 658–666
11.
KurthR. E.WoodsK. S.‘Probabilistic damage tolerant analyses for fatigue critical aircraft components,’ (1992) AnaheimCalifornia, pp. 89–97.
12.
ZhangY.LiuQ.‘Reliability-based design of automobile components.’Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering216 (D6) (2002): 455–471
13.
14.
BrowneM.LangleyR. S.GregsonP. J.‘Reliability theory for load bearing biomedical implants.’Biomaterials20 (14) (1999): 1285–1292
15.
DarF. H.MeakinJ. R.AspdenR. M.‘Statistical methods in finite element analysis.’J. Biomechanics35 (9) (2002): 1155–1161
16.
NicolellaD. P.ThackerB. H.KatoozianH.DavyD. T.‘The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.’J. Biomechanics39 (7) (2006): 1265–1278
17.
MehrezL.BahM. T.BrowneM.‘Reliability analysis: A new approach to assess the performance of a cemented total hip replacement.’ In the 7th International Conference on Engineering structural integrity assessment (ESIA7)
18.
BahM. T.BrowneM.‘Effect of geometrical uncertainty on cemented hip implant structural integrity.’Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng131 (5) (2009): 054501
19.
BahM. T.NairP. B.BrowneM.‘Mesh morphing for finite element analysis of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements.’Med. Engng Physics31 (10) (2009): 1235–1243
20.
ChangP. B.WilliamsB. J.BhallaK. S. B.BelknapT. W.SantnerT. J.NotzW. I.BartelD. L.‘Design and analysis of robust total joint replacements: Finite element model experiments with environmental variables.’Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng123 (3) (2001): 239–246
21.
OngK. L.LehmanJ.NotzW. I.SantnerT. J.BartelD. L.‘Acetabular cup geometry and bone-implant interference have more influence on initial periprosthetic joint space than joint loading and surgical cup insertion.’Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng128 (2) (2006): 169–175
22.
JeffersJ. R.BrowneM.LennonA. B.PrendergastP. J.TaylorM.‘Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: Experimental and computational testing.’J. Biomechanics40 (7) (2007): 1525–1533
23.
JeffersJ. R.BrowneM.RoquesA.TaylorM.‘On the importance of considering porosity when simulating the fatigue of bone cement.’Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng127 (4) (2005): 563–570
VicecontiM.BrusiG.PancantiA.CristofoliniL.‘Primary stability of an anatomical cementless hip stem: A statistical analysis.’J. Biomechanics39 (7) (2006): 1169–1179
26.
Dopico-GonzalezC.NewA. M.BrowneM.‘Probabilistic analysis of an uncemented total hip replacement.’Med. Engng Physics31 (4) (2009): 470–476
27.
Dopico-GonzalezC.NewA. M.BrowneM.‘A computational tool for the probabilistic finite element analysis of an uncemented total hip replacement considering variability in bone—implant version angle.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng13 (1) (2010): 1–9
28.
Dopico-GonzalezC.NewA. M.BrowneM.‘Probabilistic finite element analysis of the uncemented hip replacement — effect of femur characteristics and implant geometry.’J. Biomechanics43 (3) (2010): 512–520
29.
PérezM. A.GrasaJ.García-AznarJ. M.BeaJ. A.DoblaréM.‘Probabilistic analysis of the influence of the bonding degree of the stem—cement interface in the performance of cemented hip prostheses.’J. Biomechanics39 (10) (2006): 1859–1872
30.
Perillo-MarconeA.Alonso-VazquezA.TaylorM.‘Assessment of the effect of mesh density on the material property discretisation within QCT based FE models: A practical example using the implanted proximal tibia.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng6 (1) (2003): 17–26
31.
TaddeiF.CristofoliniL.MartelliS.GillH. S.VicecontiM.‘Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy.’J. Biomechanics39 (13) (2006): 2457–2467
32.
VicecontiM.DavinelliM.TaddeiF.CappelloA.‘Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies.’J. Biomechanics37 (10) (2004): 1597–1605
33.
RadcliffeI. A.TaylorM.‘Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: A multi-femur finite element analysis.’Clin. Biomechanics22 (7) (2007): 780–786
34.
RadcliffeI. A.TaylorM.‘Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: A multi-femur finite element analysis.’Clin. Biomechanics22 (4) (2007): 422–430
35.
LazP. J.StoweJ. Q.BaldwinM. A.PetrellaA. J.RullkoetterP. J.‘Incorporating uncertainty in mechanical properties for finite element-based evaluation of bone mechanics.’J. Biomechanics40 (13) (2007): 2831–2836
36.
TaddeiF.MartelliS.ReggianiB.CristofoliniL.VicecontiM.‘Finite-element modeling of bones from CT data: Sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties.’IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Engng53 (11) (2006): 2194–2200
37.
Della CroceU.CamomillaV.LeardiniA.CappozzoA.‘Femoral anatomical frame: Assessment of various definitions.’Med. Engng Physics25 (5) (2003): 425–431
38.
Della CroceU.CappozzoA.KerriganD. C.‘Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles.’Med. Biolog. Engng and Computing37 (2) (1999): 155–161
39.
de GrootJ. H.‘The variability of shoulder motions recorded by means of palpation.’Clin. Biomechanics12 (7/8) (1997): 461–472
40.
LangenderferJ. E.RullkoetterP. J.MellA. G.LazP. J.‘A multi-subject evaluation of uncertainty in anatomical landmark location on shoulder kinematic description.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng12 (2) (2009): 211–216
41.
MortonN. A.MaletskyL. P.PalS.LazP. J.‘Effect of variability in anatomical landmark location on knee kinematic description.’J. Orthop. Res.25 (2007): 1221–1230
42.
RaoG.AmarantiniD.BertonE.FavierD.‘Influence of body segments’ parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait.’J. Biomechanics39 (8) (2006): 1531–1536
43.
HoldenJ. P.StanhopeS. J.‘The effect of variation in knee center location estimates on net knee joint moments.’Gait and Posture7 (1998): 1–6
44.
ReinboltJ. A.HaftkaR. T.ChmielewskiT. L.FreglyB. J.‘Are patient-specific joint and inertial parameters necessary for accurate inverse dynamics analyses of gait?’IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Engng54 (5) (2007): 782–793
45.
LangenderferJ. E.LazP. J.PetrellaA. J.RullkoetterP. J.‘An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics.’Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng130 (1) (2008): 014502–014507
46.
MostE.AxeJ.RubashH.LiG.‘Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes.’J. Biomechanics37 (11) (2004): 1743–1748
47.
FreglyB. J.BanksS. A.D'LimaD. D.CliffordW.ColwellJ.‘Sensitivity of knee replacement contact calculations to kinematic measurement errors.’J. Orthop. Res.26 (9) (2008): 1173–1179
48.
LazP. J.PalS.FieldsA.PetrellaA. J.RullkoetterP. J.‘Effects of knee simulator loading and alignment variability on predicted implant mechanics: A probabilistic study.’J. Orthop. Res.24 (12) (2006): 2212–2221
49.
LazP. J.PalS.HalloranJ. P.PetrellaA. J.RullkoetterP. J.‘Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics.’J. Biomechanics39 (12) (2006): 2303–2310
50.
PalS.HaiderH.LazP. J.KnightL. A.RullkoetterP. J.‘Probabilistic computational modeling of total knee replacement wear.’Wear264 (7–8) (2008): 701–707
51.
StricklandM. A.BrowneM.TaylorM.‘Could passive knee laxity be related to active gait mechanics? An exploratory computational biomechanical study using probabilistic methods.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng (2009).
52.
RaceA.AmisA. A.‘The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament.’J. Biomechanics27 (1) (1994): 13–24
53.
RobinsonJ. R.BullA. M. J.AmisA. A.‘Structural properties of the medial collateral ligament complex of the human knee.’J. Biomechanics38 (5) (2005): 1067–1074
54.
ChandrashekarN.MansouriH.SlauterbeckJ.HashemiJ.‘Sex-based differences in the tensile properties of the human anterior cruciate ligament.’J. Biomechanics39 (16) (2006): 2943–2950
55.
HurschlerC.ProvenzanoP. P.VanderbyR.‘Application of a probabilistic microstructural model to determine reference length and toe-to-linear region transition in fibrous connective tissue.’Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng125 (3) (2003): 415–422
56.
BontempiM.‘Probabilistic model of ligaments and tendons: Quasistatic linear stretching.’Phys. Rev. E.79 (3) (2009): 030903
57.
GollehonD. L.TorzilliP. A.WarrenR. F.‘The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee — a biomechanical study.’J. Bone Jt Surg. — Am. Vol. 69A (2) (1987): 233–242
58.
MarkolfK. L.KochanA.AmstutzH. C.‘Measurement of knee stiffness and laxity in patients with documented absence of the anterior cruciate ligament.’J. Bone Jt Surg. — Am. Vol. 66A (2) (1984): 242–253
59.
RobinsonJ. R.BullA. M. J.ThomasR. R. D.AmisA. A.‘The role of the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial capsule in controlling knee laxity.’Am. J. Sports Medicine34 (11) (2006): 1815–1823
60.
WeissJ. A.GardinerJ. C.EllisB. J.LujanT. J.PhatakN. S.‘Three-dimensional finite element modeling of ligaments: Technical aspects.’Med. Engng Physics27 (10) (2005): 845–861
61.
PeñaE.CalvoB.MartínezM. A.DoblaréM.‘A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the combined behavior of ligaments and menisci in the healthy human knee joint.’J. Biomechanics39 (9) (2006): 1686–1701
62.
BeillasP.LeeS. W.TashmanS.YangK. H.‘Sensitivity of the tibio-femoral response to finite element modeling parameters.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng10 (3) (2007): 209–221
63.
MesfarW.Shirazi-AdlA.‘Biomechanics of changes in ACL and PCL material properties or prestrains in flexion under muscle force — implications in ligament reconstruction.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng9 (4) (2006): 201–209
64.
Bylski-AustrowD. I.GroodE. S.HefzyM. S.HoldenJ. P.ButlerD. L.‘Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: A mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension.’J. Orthop. Res.8 (4) (1990): 522–531
65.
GroodE. S.HefzyM. S.LindenfieldT. N.‘Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part 1. The posterior cruciate ligament.’Am. J. Sports Medicine17 (2) (1989): 197–207
66.
HefzyM. S.GroodE. S.NoyesF. R.‘Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part 2. The anterior cruciate ligament.’Am. J. Sports Medicine17 (2) (1989): 208–216
67.
BaldwinM. A.LazP. J.StoweJ. Q.RullkoetterP. J.‘Efficient probabilistic representation of tibiofemoral soft tissue constraint.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng12 (6) (2009): 651–659
68.
LiG.SuggsJ.GillT.‘The effect of anterior cruciate ligament injury on knee joint function under a simulated muscle load: A three-dimensional computational simulation.’Ann. Biomed. Engng30 (5) (2002): 713–720
69.
ThackerB. H.NicolellaD. P.KumaresanS.YoganandanN.PintarF. A.‘Probabilistic finite element analysis of the human lower cervical spine.’J. Math. Model. and Sci. Comp. (2001): 12–21.
70.
NgH. W.TeoE. C.‘Probabilistic design analysis of the influence of material property on the human cervical spine.’J. Spinal Disorders and Techniques17 (2) (2004): 123–133
71.
LeeK. K.TeoE. C.‘Material sensitivity study on lumbar motion segment (L2–L3) under sagittal plane loadings using probabilistic method.’J. Spinal Disorders and Techniques18 (2) (2005): 163–170
72.
RaoM.PetrellaA. J.BaldwinM. A.LazP. J.RullkoetterP. J.‘Efficient probabilistic finite element modeling for evaluation of spinal mechanics.’ In Transactions of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research SocietyLas VegasNevada, 2009, p. 1771.
73.
RohlmannA.MannA.ZanderT.BergmannG.‘Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: A probabilistic finite element study.’Eur. Spine J.18 (1) (2009): 89–97
74.
PalS.LangenderferJ. E.StoweJ. Q.LazP. J.PetrellaA. J.RullkoetterP. J.‘Probabilistic modeling of knee muscle moment arms: Effects of methods, origin-insertion, and kinematic variability.’Ann. Biomed. Engng35 (9) (2007): 1632–1642
75.
ScovilC. Y.RonskyJ. L.‘Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters.’J. Biomechanics39 (11) (2006): 2055–2063
76.
McLeanS. G.HuangX.SuA.van den BogertA. J.‘Sagittal plane biomechanics cannot injure the ACL during sidestep cutting.’Clin. Biomechanics19 (8) (2004): 828–838
77.
FliegN. G.GattiC. J.DoroL. C.LangenderferJ. E.CarpenterJ. E.HughesR. E.‘A stochastic analysis of glenoid inclination angle and superior migration of the humeral head.’Clin. Biomechanics23 (5) (2008): 554–561
78.
LangenderferJ.CarpenterJ.JohnsonM.AnK.-n.HughesR.‘A probabilistic model of glenohumeral external rotation strength for healthy normals and rotator cuff tear cases.’Ann. Biomed. Engng34 (3) (2006): 465–476
79.
LangenderferJ. E.HughesR. E.CarpenterJ. E.‘A stochastic model of elbow flexion strength for subjects with and without long head biceps tear.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng8 (5) (2005): 315–322
80.
Valero-CuevasF. J.JohansonM. E.TowlesJ. D.‘Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: The choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty in musculoskeletal parameters.’J. Biomechanics36 (2003): 1019–1030
81.
SantosV. J.Valero-CuevasF. J.‘Reported anatomical variability naturally leads to multimodal distributions of Denavit—Hartenberg parameters for the human thumb.’IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Engng53 (2) (2006): 155–163
82.
ConnollyA.FitzPatrickD.MoultonJ.LeeJ.LernerA.‘Tibiofemoral cartilage thickness distribution and its correlation with anthropometric variables.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine222 (H1) (2008): 29–39 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM306.
83.
RadcliffeI. A.PrescottP.ManH. S.TaylorM.‘Determination of suitable sample sizes for multi-patient based finite element studies.’Med. Engng Physics29 (10) (2007): 1065–1072
84.
CootesT. F.TaylorC. J.CooperD. H.GrahamJ.‘Active shape models — their training and application.’Computer Vision and Image Understanding61 (1) (1995): 38–59
85.
MellerS.KalenderW. A.‘Building a statistical shape model of the pelvis.’Int. Congr. Ser.1268 (2004): 561–566
86.
BehielsG.MaesF.VandermeulenD.SuetensP.‘Evaluation of image features and search strategies for segmentation of bone structures in radiographs using active shape models.’Med. Image Analysis6 (1) (2002): 47–62
87.
JolliffeI. T.Principal component analysis, edition 2, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer-VerlagNew York2002)
88.
BredbennerT. L.NicolellaD. P.‘Statistical shape and density based finite element modeling of the human proximal femur.’ In Transactions of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, California2008, p. 0305.
89.
BryanR.MohanS.HopkinsA.NairP.TaylorM.‘Generation of a statistical model of the whole femur incorporating shape and material property distribution.’ In Transactions of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, California2008, p. 0912.
90.
QuerolL. B.BuchlerP.RueckertD.NolteL. P.BallesterM. A. G.‘Statistical finite element model for bone shape and biomechanical properties.’Med. Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2006, Pt 14190 (2006): 405–411
91.
BryanR.NairP. B.TaylorM.‘Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk.’J. Biomechanics42 (2009): 2171–2176
92.
BaldwinM. A.LangenderferJ. E.RullkoetterP. J.LazP. J.‘Development of subject-specific and statistical shape models of the knee using an efficient segmentation and mesh-morphing approach.’Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine97 (2010): 232–240
93.
FitzpatrickC.FitzPatrickD.LeeJ.AugerD.‘Statistical design of unicompartmental tibial implants and comparison with current devices.’Knee14 (2) (2007): 138–144
94.
BarrattD. C.ChanC. S. K.EdwardsP. J.PenneyG. P.SlomczykowskiM.CarterT. J.HawkesD. J.‘Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging.’Med. Image Analysis12 (3) (2008): 358–374
95.
ShimV. B.PittoR. P.StreicherR. M.HunterP. J.AndersonI. A.‘Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set.’Trans ASME, J. Biomech. Engng130 (5) (2008): 051010
96.
RajamaniK. T.StynerM. A.TalibH.ZhengG.NolteL. P.Gonzalez BallesterM. A.‘Statistical deformable bone models for robust 3D surface extrapolation from sparse data.’Med. Image Analysis11 (2) (2007): 99–109
97.
YangY. M.RueckertD.BullA. M. J.‘Predicting the shapes of bones at a joint: Application to the shoulder.’Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng11 (1) (2008): 19–30
98.
EssnerA.HerreraL.YauS.-S.WangA.DumbletonJ. H.ManleyM. T.‘Sequentially crosslinked and annealed UHMWPE knee wear debris.’ In Transactions of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, DC2005, p. 0071.
99.
WilliamsP. A.TsukamotoR.ClarkeI. C.‘Wear debris from sequentially crosslinked and crosslinked PE in a knee simulator model.’ In Transactions of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, California2008, p. 0218.
100.
HalloranJ. P.EasleyS. K.PetrellaA. J.RullkoetterP. J.‘Comparison of deformable and elastic foundation finite element simulations for predicting knee replacement mechanics.’Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng127 (5) (2005): 813–818
