The calculation of the patellofemoral joint contact force using three-dimensional (3D) modelling techniques requires a description of the musculoskeletal geometry of the lower limb. In this study, the influence of the complexity of the muscle model was studied by considering two different muscle models, the Delp and Horsman models. Both models were used to calculate the patellofemoral force during standing, vertical jumping, and Olympic-style weightlifting. The patellofemoral forces predicted by the Horsman model were markedly lower than those predicted by the Delp model in all activities and represented more realistic values when compared with previous work. This was found to be a result of a lower level of redundancy in the Delp model, which forced a higher level of muscular activation in order to allow a viable solution. The higher level of complexity in the Horsman model resulted in a greater degree of redundancy and consequently lower activation and patellofemoral forces. The results of this work demonstrate that a well-posed muscle model must have an adequate degree of complexity to create a sufficient independence, variability, and number of moment arms in order to ensure adequate redundancy of the force-sharing problem such that muscle forces are not overstated.
ArnoldA. S.LiuM. Q.SchwartzM. H.OunpuuS.DiasL. S.DelpS. L.‘Do the hamstrings operate at increased muscle-tendon lengths and velocities after surgical lengthening?’J. Biomechanics39 (2006): 1498–1506
2.
CharltonI. W.JohnsonG. R.‘A model for the prediction of forces at the glenohumeral joint.’Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine220 (H8) (2006): 801–812 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM147.
3.
DelpS. L.StatlerK.CarrollN. C.‘Preserving plantar flexion strength after surgical-treatment for contracture of the triceps surae — a computer-simulation study.’J. Orthop. Res.13 (1995): 96–104
4.
ThelenD. G.ChumanovE. S.BestT. M.SwansonS. C.HeiderscheitB. C.‘Simulation of biceps femoris musculotendon mechanics during the swing phase of sprinting.’Med. Sci. Sport Exer.37 (2005): 1931–1938
5.
ThelenD. G.ChumanovE. S.HoerthD. M.BestT. M.SwansonS. C.YoungM.HeiderscheitB. C.‘Hamstring muscle kinematics during treadmill sprinting.’Med. Sci. Sport Exer.37 (2005): 108–114
6.
ThelenD. G.ChumanovE. S.SherryM. A.HeiderscheitB. C.‘Neuromusculoskeletal models provide insights into the mechanisms and rehabilitation of hamstring strains.’Exer. Sports Sci. Rev.34 (2006): 135–141
7.
van der HelmF. C. T.VeegerH. E. J.‘Quasi-static analysis of muscle forces in the shoulder mechanism during wheelchair propulsion.’J. Biomechanics29 (1996): 39–52
8.
DelpS. L.Surgery simulation: a computer graphics system to analyze and design musculoskeletal reconstructions of the lower limb PhD Thesis, Stanford University, 1990.
9.
DelpS. L.LoanJ. P.HoyM. G.ZajacF. E.ToppE. L.RosenJ. M.‘An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures.’IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engng37 (1990): 757–767
10.
DelpS. L.LoanJ. P.‘A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures.’Comp. Biol. Med.25 (1995): 21–34
11.
ArnoldA. S.DelpS. L.‘Rotational moment arms of the medial hamstrings and adductors vary with femoral geometry and limb position: Implications of the treatment of internally rotated gait.’J. Biomechanics34 (2001): 437–447
12.
PiazzaS. J.DelpS. L.‘The influence of muscles on knee flexion during the swing phase of gait.’J. Biomechanics29 (1996): 723–733
13.
BrandR. A.PetersonI.FriederichI.‘The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area.’J. Biomechanics19 (1986): 589–596
14.
FriederichI.BrandR. A.‘Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb.’J. Biomechanics23 (1990): 91–95
15.
WickiewiczT. L.RoyR. R.PowellP. L.EdgertonV. R.‘Muscle architecture of the human lower limb.’Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.179 (1983): 275–283
16.
AndersonF. C.PandyM. G.‘A dynamic optimization solution for vertical jumping in three dimensions.’Comp. Meth. Biomech. Biomech. Engng2 (1999): 201–231
17.
NaganoA.KomuraT.FukashiroS.HimenoR.‘Force, work and power output of lower limb muscles during human maximal-effort countermovement jumping.’J. Electromyog. Kinesiol.15 (2005): 367–376
18.
HorsmanM. D.KoopmanH. F. J. M.van der HelmF. C. T.Poliacu ProseL.VeegerH. E. J.‘Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity.’Clin. Biomechanics22 (2007): 239–247
19.
DevereauxM. D.LachmannS. M.‘Patello-femoral arthralgia in athletes attending a sports injury clinic.’Brit. J. Sport Med.18 (1984): 18–21
20.
BrechterJ. H.PowersC. M.‘Patellofemoral joint stress during stair ascent and descent in persons with and without patellofemoral pain.’Gait Posture16 (2002): 115–123
21.
BrechterJ. H.PowersC. M.‘Patellofemoral stress during walking in persons with and without patellofemoral pain.’Med. Sci. Sport Exer.34 (2002): 1582–1593
22.
FellerJ. A.AmisA. A.AndrishJ. T.ArendtE. A.ErasmusP. J.PowersC. M.‘Surgical biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint.’Arthrosc.23 (2007): 542–553
23.
HubertiH. H.HayesW. C.‘Patellofemoral contact pressures: The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact.’J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 66A (1984): 715–724
24.
SimpsonK. J.JamesonE. G.OdumS.‘Estimated patellofemoral compressive forces and contact pressures during dance landings.’J. Appl. Biomechanics12 (1996): 1–14
25.
VanezisA.LeesA.‘A biomechanical analysis of good and poor performers of the vertical jump.’Ergonomics48 (2005): 1594–1603
26.
LeesA.VanrenterghemJ.De ClercqD.‘The maximal and submaximal vertical jump: Implications for strength and conditioning.’J. Streng. Cond. Res.18 (2004): 787–791
27.
Van Sint JanS.Skeletal landmark definitions: guidelines for accurate and reproducible palpation (University of Brussels, Department of Anatomy (www.ulb.ac.be/anatemb) 2005).
28.
Van Sint JanS.CroceU. D.‘Identifying the location of human skeletal landmarks: Why standardized definitions are necessary — a proposal.’Clin. Biomechanics20 (2005): 659–660
29.
HornB. K. P.‘Closed form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions.’J. Opt. Soc. Am.4 (1987): 629–642
30.
LeeJ.ShinS. Y.‘General construction of time-domain filters for orientation data.’IEEE Trans. Vis. Comp. Graphics8 (2002): 119–128
31.
WinterD. A.Biomechanics and motor control of human movement (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey2005)
32.
de LevaP.‘Adjustments to Zatsiorsky—Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters.’J. Biomechanics29 (1996): 1223–1230
33.
NisellR.NemethG.OhlsenH.‘Joint forces in exension of the knee — analysis of a mechanical model.’Acta Orthop. Scand.57 (1986): 41–46
34.
van EijdenT. M. G. J.DeboerW.WeijsW. A.‘The orientation of the distal part of the quadriceps femoris muscle as a function of the knee flexion extension angle.’J. Biomechanics18 (1985): 803–809
35.
YamaguchiG. T.ZajacF. E.‘A planar model for the knee-joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism.’J. Biomechanics22 (1989): 1–10
36.
CharltonI. W.JohnsonG. R.‘Application of spherical and cylindrical wrapping algorithms in a musculoskeletal model of the upper limb.’J. Biomechanics34 (2001): 1209–1216
37.
CrowninshieldR. D.BrandR. A.‘A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion.’J. Biomechanics14 (1981): 793–801
38.
YamaguchiG. T.Dynamic modeling of musculoskeletal motion: a vectorized approach for biomechanical analysis in three dimensions (SpringerNew York2001)
39.
PowersC. M.ChenY. J.ScherI.LeeT. Q.‘The influence of patellofemoral joint contact geometry on the modeling of three dimensional patellofemoral joint forces.’J. Biomechanics39 (2006): 2783–2791
40.
WuG.SieglerS.AllardP.KirtleyC.LeardiniA.RosenbaumD.WhittleM.LimaD. D.CristofoliniL.WitteH.‘ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion — part I: Ankle, hip, and spine.’J. Biomechanics35 (2002): 543–548
41.
SmithA. J.‘Estimates of muscle and joint forces at the knee and ankle during a jumping activity.’J. Hum. Mov. Stud.1 (1975): 78–86
42.
MarsdenS. P.SwailesD. C.‘A novel approach to the calculation of musculotendon paths.’Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine222 (H1) (2008): 51–61 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM297.
