The success rates and morbidity of operations on the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) have improved markedly in the last 20—25 years. This has been largely due to improved vision, by microscopes and endoscopes, and has led to a greatly reduced hospital stay. During this time there has been minimal improvement in surgical tools. This paper discusses the need for robotic tools, detailing the clinical constraints that proposed solutions need to adhere to, and presenting a recently trialled micro drilling robot for creating a cochleostomy in the cochlear implant procedure.
PantH.FergusonB. J.MacardleP. J.‘The role of allergy in rhinosinusitis.’Curr. Opinion Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.17 (3) (2009): 232–238
2.
SeiberlingK. A.ConleyD. B.TripathiA.GrammerL. C.ShuhL.HainesG. K.SchleimerR.KernR. C.‘Superantigens and chronic rhinosinusitis: Detection of staphylococcal exotoxins in nasal polyps.’Laryngoscope115 (9) (2005): 1580–1585
3.
EbbensF. A.GeorgalasC.RiniaA. B.van DrunenC. M.LundV. J.FokkensW. J.‘The fungal debate: Where do we stand today?’Rhinology45 (3) (2007): 178–189
4.
NeumannA. M.Pasquale-NieblesK.BhutaT.SillersM. J.‘Image-guided transnasal endoscopic surgery of the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base.’Am. J. Rhinol.13 (6) (1999): 449–454
5.
KnottP. D.BatraP. S.ButlerR. S.CitardiM. J.‘Contour and paired-point registration in a model for image-guided surgery.’Laryngoscope116 (10) (2006): 1877–1881
6.
JakopecM.HarrisS. J.BaenaF. R. Y.GomesP.CobbJ.DaviesB. L.‘The first clinical application of a ‘hands-on’ robotic knee surgery system.’Computer Aided Sur.6 (6) (2001): 329–339
7.
YoungN.NguyenT.WietR.‘Cochlear implantation.’Operative Tech. in Otolaryngol.14 (4) (2003): 263–267
8.
DodenE.HalvesR.‘On the functional morphology of the human petrous bone.’Am. J. Anat.169 (1984): 451–462
9.
GstoettnerW.KieferJ.BaumgartnerW.PokS.PetersS.AdunkaO.‘Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.’Acta Otolaryngol.124 (2004): 348–352
10.
BalkanyT. J.ConnellS. S.HodgesA. V.PayneS. L.TelischiF. F.EshraghiA. A.AngeliS. I.GermaniR.MessiahS.ArheartK. L.‘Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.’Otol. Neurotol.27 (8) (2006): 1083–8
11.
KarzynskiH.LorensA.D'HaeseP.WalkowiakA.PiotrowskaA.ŚliwaL.AndersonI.‘Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: An initial study.’J Otorhinolaryngol. Related Specialities64 (4) (2002): 247–253
12.
MorganP. S.CarterT.DavisS.SepehriA.PuntJ.ByrneP.MoodyA.FinlayP.‘The application accuracy of the PathFinder neurosurgical robot.’ In Proceedings of CARS 2003, London, UK, pp. 561–567 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam).
13.
SchipperJ.AschendorffA.ArapakisI.KlenznerT.TeszlerC. B.RidderG. J.LaszigR.‘Navigation as a quality management tool in cochlear implant surgery.’J. Laryngol. Otol.118 (10) (2004): 764–770
14.
JamesC.AlbeggerK.BattmerR.BurdoS.DeggoujN.DeguineO.DillierN.GersdorffM.LaszigR.LenarzT.RodriguezM. M.MondainM.OffeciersE.MacíasA. R.RamsdenR.SterkersO.Von WallenbergE.WeberB.FraysseB.‘Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: How and why.’Acta Otolaryngol.125 (5) (2005): 481–491
15.
BrettP. N.BakerD. A.ReyesL.BlanshardJ.‘An automatic technique for micro-drilling a stapedotomy in the flexible stapes footplate.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine209 (H4) (1995): 255–262 DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_352_02.
16.
BrettP. N.BakerD. A.TaylorR.GriffithsM. V.‘Controlling the penetration of flexible bone tissue using the stapedotomy microdrill.’Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering218 (I5) (2004): 343–351
17.
PakM. W.VlantisA. C.ChowS.van HasseltC. A.‘How reliable is contact endoscopy of the nasopharynx in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer?’Laryngoscope119 (3) (2009): 523–527
