How does the central nervous system address the kinetic redundancy in the lumbar spine? Three-dimensional isometric exertions with 18 Hill-model-based muscle fascicles at the L4

Abstract

The human motor system is organized for execution of various motor tasks in a different and flexible manner. The kinetic redundancy in the human musculoskeletal system is a significant property by which the central nervous system achieves many complementary goals. An equilibrium-based biomechanical model of isometric three-dimensional exertions of trunk muscles has been developed. Following the definition and role of the uncontrolled manifold, the kinetic redundancy concept is explored in mathematical terms. The null space of the kinetically redundant system when a certain joint moment and/or stiffness are needed is derived and discussed. The aforementioned concepts have been illustrated, using a three-dimensional three-degrees-of-freedom biomechanical model of the spine with 18 anatomically oriented Hill-type-model muscle fascicles. The considerations of stability and its consequence on the internal loading of the spine and coactivation consequences are discussed in both general and specific cases. The results can shed light on the interaction mechanisms in muscle activation patterns seen in various tasks and exertions and can provide a significant understanding for future research studies and clinical practices related to low-back disorders. Alteration of recruitment patterns in low-back-pain patients has been explained on the basis of this biomechanical analysis. The higher coactivation results in higher internal loading while providing higher joint stiffness that enhances spinal stability, which guards against spinal deformation in the presence of any perturbations.

Keywords

central nervous system kinetic redundancy lumbar spine biomechanical model Hill-model-based muscle fascicles

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kaufman

K. R.

Chao

E. Y.

Rubash

H. E.

‘Prediction of antagonistic muscle forces using inverse dynamic optimization during flexion/extension of the knee.’

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng 121 (1999): 316–322

Zeinali-Davarani

Hemami

Barin

Shirazi-Adl

Parnianpour

‘Dynamic stability of spine using stability-based optimization and muscle spindle reflex.’

IEEE Trans. Neural Systems Rehabil. Engng 16 (2008): 106–118

Nussbaum

M. A.

Chaffin

D. B.

‘Lumbar muscle force estimation using a subject-invariant 5-parameter EMG-based model.’

J. Biomech. 31 (1998): 667–672

Arjmand

Shirazi-Adl

Parnianpour

‘Trunk biomechanics during maximum isometric axial torque exertions in upright standing.’

Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 23 (2008): 969–978

Pomero

Lavaste

Imbert

Skalli

‘A proprioception based regulation model to estimate the trunk muscle forces.’

Comput. Meth. Biomech. Biomed. Engng 7 (2004): 331–338

Burdet

Osu

Franklin

D. W.

Milner

T. E.

Kawato

‘The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance.’

Nature 414 (2001): 446–449

Neilson

P. D.

Neilson

M. D.

‘Motor maps and synergies.’

Hum. Movement Sci 24 (2005): 774–797

Nasseroleslami

Parnianpour

Mousavi

S. J.

‘Muscles coactivation in biomechanical models.’

J. Res. Rehabil. Sci. (Med. Univ. Isfahan) 4 (2007): 5–10

Cholewicki

McGill

S. M.

‘Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: Implications for injury and chronic low back pain.’

Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 11 (1996): 1–15

10.

Siegler

Allard

Kirtley

Leardini

Rosenbaum

Whittle

D'Lima

D. D.

Cristofolini

Witte

Schmid

Stokes

‘ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion — Part I: Ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics.’

J. Biomech. 35 (2002): 543–548

11.

Pandy

M. G.

Zajac

F. E.

Sim

Levine

W. S.

‘An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping.’

J. Biomech. 23 (1990): 1185–1198

12.

Hatze

‘A myocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle.’

Biol. Cybernetcs 25 (1977): 103–119

13.

McGill

S. M.

Norman

R. W.

‘Partitioning of the L4–L5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous, and muscular components during lifting.’

Spine 11 (1986): 666–678

14.

Parnianpour

Nordin

Kahanovitz

Frankel

‘1988 Volvo award in biomechanics. The triaxial coupling of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometric exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertial movements on the motor output and movement patterns.’

Spine 13 (1988): 982–992

15.

Mousavi

S. J.

Olyaei

G. R.

Talebian

Sanjari

M. A.

Parnianpour

‘The effect of angle and level of exertion on trunk neuromuscular performance during multidirectional isometric activities.’

Spine 34 (2009): E170-E177.

16.

Moseley

G. L.

Hodges

P. W.

‘Are the changes in postural control associated with low back pain caused by pain interference?’

Clin. J. Pain 21 (2005): 323–329

17.

Hall

Tsao

Macdonald

Coppieters

Hodges

P. W.

‘Immediate effects of co-contraction training on motor control of the trunk muscles in people with recurrent low back pain.’

J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 19 (2009): 763–773

18.

Hughes

R. E.

Chaffin

D. B.

Lavender

S. A.

Andersson

G. B. J.

‘Evaluation of muscle force prediction models of the lumbar trunk using surface electromyography.’

J. Orthop. Res. 12 (1994): 689–698

19.

Dul

‘The biomechanical prediction of muscle forces.’

J. Biomech. 1 (1986): 27–28

20.

Scholz

J. P.

Schoner

‘The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task.’

Expl Brain Res. 126 (1999): 289–306

21.

Lawrence

B. M.

Buckner

G. D.

Mirka

G. A.

‘An adaptive system identification model of the biomechanical response of the human trunk during sudden loading.’

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng 128 (2006): 235–241

22.

Cholewicki

Simons

A. P.

Radebold

‘Effects of external trunk loads on lumbar spine stability.’

J. Biomech. 33 (2000): 1377–1385

23.

Bergmark

‘Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering.’

Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl. 230 (1989): 1–54

24.

Cholewicki

McGill

S. M.

‘Relationship between muscle force and stiffness in the whole mammalian muscle: A simulation study.’

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng 117 (1995): 339–342

25.

Potvin

J. R.

O'Brien

P. R.

‘Trunk muscle co-contraction increases during fatiguing, isometric, lateral bend exertions. Possible implications for spine stability.’

Spine 23 (1998): 774–780; discussion, 781.

26.

Neilson

M. D.

Neilson

P. D.

‘A neuro engineering solution to optimal tracking problem.’

Hum. Movement Sci. 28 (1999): 155–183

27.

Yamaguchi

G. T.

Moran

D. W.

‘A computationally efficient method for solving the redundant problem in biomechanics.’

J. Biomech. 28 (1995): 999–1005

28.

Ting

L. H.

‘Dimensional reduction in sensorimotor systems: A framework for understanding muscle coordination of posture.’

Prog. Brain Res. 165 (2007): 299–321

29.

Ting

L. H.

McKay

J. L.

‘Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement.’

Curr. Opinion Neurobiol. 17 (2007): 622–628

30.

Scott

S. H.

‘Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control.’

Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5 (2004): 532–546

31.

Schieber

M. H.

Santello

‘Hand function: Peripheral and central constraints on performance.’

J. Appl. Physiol. 96 (2004): 2293–2300

32.

Van Dieen

J. H.

Selen

L. P.

Cholewicki

‘Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature.’

J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 13 (2003): 333–351

33.

Reeves

N. P.

Cholewicki

‘Modeling the human lumbar spine for assessing spinal loads, stability, and risk of injury.’

Crit. Rev. Biomed. Engng 31 (2003): 73–139

34.

Guigon

Baraduc

Desmurget

‘Computational motor control: Redundancy and invariance.’

J. Neurophysiol. 97 (2007): 331–347

35.

Riley

M. A.

Turvey

M. T.

‘Variability of determinism in motor behavior.’

J. Mot. Behav. 34 (2002): 99–125

How does the central nervous system address the kinetic redundancy in the lumbar spine? Three-dimensional isometric exertions with 18 Hill-model-based muscle fascicles at the L4—L5 level

Abstract

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References