A polyurethane glenoid component has been designed and manufactured as part of a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) system based on compliant-layer (CL) technology. Compared with conventional TSA designs, this biomimetic approach offers reduced friction and wear and potentially improved longevity. In-vitro evaluation of the glenoid system has included loosening and stability tests, and wear measurement using a specially constructed wear simulator. The results obtained support the hypothesis that a CL glenoid design may provide improved resistance to dynamic loosening and rim erosion, and demonstrate superior wear performance over a standard ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene design. This study not only confirms the feasibility of a CL glenoid component but also highlights the potential to increase implant longevity, thereby allowing earlier surgical intervention before poor glenoid bone stock and soft tissue compromise the outcome of TSA.
FrichL. H.OdgaardA.DalstraM.‘Glenoid bone architecture.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.7 (4) (1998): 356–361
2.
DeshmukhA. V.KorisM.ZurakowskiD.ThornhillT. S.‘Total shoulder arthroplasty, long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.14 (5) (2005): 471–479
3.
GartsmanG. M.RoddeyT. S.HammermanS. M.‘Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis.’J. Bone Jt Surg. Am.82 (1) (2000): 26–33
4.
BoydA. D.ThomasW. H.ScottR. D.SledgeC. B.ThornhillT. S.‘Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Indications for glenoid resurfacing.’J. Arthroplasty5 (1990): 329–336
5.
TorchiaM. E.CofieldR. H.SettergrenC. R.‘Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis, long term results.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.4 (1) (1995): 12–20
NwakamaA. C.CofieldR. H.KavanaghB. F.LoehrJ. F.‘Semi-constrained total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis and massive rotator cuff tearing.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.9 (4) (2000): 302–307
8.
FranklinJ. L.BarrettW. P.JackinsS. E.MatsenF. E.‘Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency.’J. Arthroplasty3 (1) (1988): 39–46
9.
WirthM. A.AgrawalC. M.MabreyJ. D.DeanD. D.BlanchardC. R.MillerM. A.RockwoodC. A.‘Isolation and characterization of polyethylene wear debris associated with osteolysis following total shoulder arthroplasty.’J. Bone Jt Surg. Am.81 (1) (1999): 29–37
GillisA.LiS.‘Polyethylene damage of glenoid components from total shoulder replacements as determined from retrieval analysis.’ In Transactions of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, California, USA, 25–28 February 2001 p. 0775 (Orthopaedic Research Society, Rosemont, Illinois).
14.
UnsworthA.PearcyM. J.WhiteE. F. T.WhiteG.‘Frictional properties of artificial hip joints.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine17 (3) (1988): 101–104 DOI: 10.1243/EMED_JOUR_1988_017_029_02.
15.
ScholesS. C.UnsworthA.BlameyJ. M.BurgessI. C.JonesE.SmithN.‘Design aspects of compliant, soft layer bearings for an experimental hip prosthesis.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine219 (H2) (2005): 79–87 DOI: 10.1243/095441105X9318.
16.
SmithS. L.AshH. E.UnsworthA.‘A tribological study of UHMWPE acetabular cups and polyurethane compliant layer acetabular cups.’J. Biomed. Mater. Res.53 (6) (2000): 710–716
17.
KhanI.Environment-induced changes in biomedical polyurethanes PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
18.
SwieszkowskiW.KuD. N.BerseeH. E. N.KurzydlowskiK. J.‘An elastic material for cartilage replacement in an arthritic shoulder joint.’Biomaterials27 (2006): 1534–1541
19.
ASTM F2028–05. Standard test methods for the dynamic evaluation of glenoid loosening or disassociation (ASTM InternationalWest Conshohocken, Pennsylvania). 2005)
20.
ASTM F1378–00. Standard specification for shoulder prosthesis (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania) 2000)
21.
GearyC.The evaluation of novel designs for a glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty, incorporating compliant bearing technology PhD Thesis, Unversity of Limerick, Ireland, 2007.
22.
GearyC.BirkinshawC.JonesE.‘Characterisation of Bionate polycarbonate polyurethanes for orthopaedic applications.’J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med.19 (11) (2008): 3355–3363
23.
JonesT. E.SmithN. G.‘Prosthetic bearing element and method of manufacture.’ US Pat. 58793871999.
24.
GearyC.BirkinshawC.JonesE.‘Prosthetic glenoid component.’Eur. Pat (2008): EP 1776935 (A1)
25.
GearyC.BirkinshawC.JonesE.‘Prosthetic glenoid component.’Eur. Pat (2008): EP 1776935 (B1)
26.
ReschH. ‘Howmedica anatomic shoulder — operative technique highlights.’ Video HAS07 E 09/98 BEN10248, Stryker Corporation, Limerick, Ireland, 1999.
27.
MurphyL. A.Hypothesis-testing for glenoid component innovation in total shoulder arthroplasty PhD Thesis, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, 2002.
28.
LippittS. B.VanderhooftJ. E.HarrisS. T.SidlesJ. A.HarrymanD. T.MatsenF. A.‘Glenohumeral stability from concavity compression, a quantitative analysis.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.2 (1) (1993): 27–35
29.
AnglinC.WyssU. P.PichoraD. R.‘Mechanical testing of shoulder prostheses and recommendations for glenoid design.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. l9 (4) (2000): 323–331
30.
GuntherS. B.GrahamJ.NorrisT. R.RiesM. D.PruittL.‘Retrieved glenoid components, a classification system for surface damage analysis.’J. Arthroplasty17 (1) (2002): 95–100
31.
DowsonD.GodetM.TaylorC. M. Ed. The Wear of Non-metallic Materials Proceedings of the Third Leeds—Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Leeds, UK, September 1976, 1978 (Mechanical Engineering Publications Limited, London).
32.
SwieszkowskiW.BerseeH. E. N.van der PijlA. J.BeukersA.OosteromR.‘Shoulder wear simulator for investigation of wear of glenoid component.’ In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM 14), San Diego, California, USA, 14–18 July 2003, pp. 1–7 (Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan).
33.
HopkinsA. R.Total shoulder arthroplasty simulation using finite element analysis PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, UK, 2004.
34.
McNultyD. E.SwopeS. W.DeffenbaughD.‘In-vitro wear testing of total shoulder prostheses using conventional and crosslinked polyethylene.’ In Transactions of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Memphis, Tennessee, USA, 27–30 April 2005 (Society for Biomaterials, Mount Laurel, New Jersey).
35.
SchwartzC. J.BahadurS.‘Development and testing of a novel joint wear simulator and investigation of the viability of an elastomeric polyurethane for total-joint arthroplasty devices.’Wear262 (2007): 331–339
36.
WangF. C.JinZ. M.McEwenH. M. J.FisherJ.‘Microscopic asperity contact and deformation of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene bearing surfaces.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine217 (H6) (2003): 477–490 DOI: 10.1243/09544110360729117.
37.
JonesE.ScholesS. C.BurgessI. C.AshH. E.UnsworthA.‘Compliant layer bearings in artificial joints. Part 2: Simulator and fatigue testing to assess the durability of the interface between an elastomeric layer and a rigid substrate.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine223 (H1) (2009): 1–13 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM446.
38.
BurgessI. C.JonesE.ScholesS. C.UnsworthA.‘Compliant layer bearings in artificial joints. Part 1: The effects of different manufacturing techniques on the interface strength between an elastomeric layer and a rigid substrate.’Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine222 (H6) (2008): 853–864 DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM354.
39.
BramanJ. P.FalicovA.BoormanR.MatsenF. A.‘Alterations in surface geometry in retrieved polyethylene glenoid components.’J. Orthop. Res.24 (6) (2006): 1249–1260
40.
WeldonE. J.ScarlatM. M.LeeS. B.MatsenF. A.‘Intrinsic stability of unused and retrieved polyethylene glenoid components.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.10 (5) (2001): 474–481
41.
GreisP. E.ScuderiM. G.MohrR. A.BachusK. N.BurksR. T.‘Glenohumeral articular contact areas and pressures following labral and osseous injury to the antero-inferior quadrant of the glenoid.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.11 (5) (2002): 442–451
42.
HalderA. M.KuhlS. G.ZobitzM. E.LarsonD.AnK. N.‘Effects of the glenoid labrum and glenohumeral abduction in stability of the shoulder joint through concavity-compression.’J. Bone Jt Surg. Am.83 (7) (2001): 1062–1069
43.
KelkarR.WangV. M.FlatowE. L.NewtonP. M.AteshianG. A.BiglianiL. U.PawlukR. J.MowV. C.‘Glenohumeral mechanics, a study of articular geometry, contact, and kinematics.’J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.10 (1) (2001): 73–84
44.
SoslowskyL. J.FlatlowE. L.BiglianiL. U.‘Articular geometry of the glenohumeral joint.’Clin. Orthop. Related Res.285 (1992): 181–190
45.
SwieszkowskiW.BednarzP.OosteromR.PrendergastP. J.‘How design parameters influence contact stresses of the glenoid component.’ In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Shoulder Group (Eds KirschB.WalkerC.MembergB.), Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 17–18 June 2002, (International Shoulder Group, International Society of Biomechanics).
