Computer and robot assistance in craniotomy/craniectomy procedures is intended to increase precision and efficiency of the removal of calvarial tumours, enabling the preoperative design and manufacturing of the corresponding implant. In the framework of the CRANIO project, an active robotic system was developed to automate the milling processes based on a predefined resection planning. This approach allows for a very efficient milling process, but lacks feedback of the intra-operative process to the surgeon. To better integrate the surgeon into the process, a new teleoperated synergistic architecture was designed. This enables the surgeon to realize changes during the procedure and use their human cognitive capabilities. The preoperative planning information is used as guidance for the user interacting with the system through a master—slave architecture. In this article, the CRANIO system is presented together with this new synergistic approach. Experiments have been performed to evaluate the accuracy of the system in active and synergistic modes for the bone milling procedure. The laboratory studies showed the general feasibility of the new concept for the selected medical procedure and determined the accuracy of the system. Although the integration of the surgeon partially reduces the efficiency of the milling process compared with a purely active (automatic) milling, it provides more feedback and flexibility to the user during the intra-operative procedure.
EngelhardtM.‘Analysis of surgical management of calvarial tumours and first results of a newly designed robotic trepanation system.’Minimally Invasive Neurosurg.49 (2006): 98–103
2.
BastP.‘Robot- and computer-assisted craniotomy: Resection planning, implant modelling and robot safety.’Int. J. Med. Robotics and Computer Assisted Surg.2 (2006): 168–178
3.
WehmöllerM.‘Skull bone reconstruction after hemicraniectomy with a prefabricated implant.’Proceedings of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (2003) vol. 17, pp. 716–719 (Elsevier).
4.
SaringerW.Nobauer-HuhmannI.KnospE.‘Cranioplasty with individual carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) medical grade implants based on CAD/CAM technique.’Acta Neurochir144 (11) (2002): 1193–1203
5.
FederspilP. A.GeisthoffU. W.HenrichD.PlinkertP. K.‘Development of the first force-controlled robot for otoneurosurgery.’Laryngoscope113 (3) (2003): 465–471
BaiS. P.TeoM. Y.NgW. S.SimC.‘Workspace analysis of a parallel manipulator with one redundant DOF for skull-base surgery. International conference on Intelligent Robotics and Systems (IROS).’ Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robot and systems
10.
BastP.‘Identification of milling parameters for manual cutting of bicortical bone structures.’Computer Aided Surg.8 (5) (2003): 257–263
11.
PopovicA.‘CRANIO — Computer assisted planning for navigated and robot assisted surgery on the skull.’ In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress and Exhibition on CARS 2003 — computer assisted radiology and surgery
12.
EggersG.‘Image data acquisition and segmentation for accurate modelling of the calvarium.’Medical imaging 2004: Visualization, image-guided procedures, and display (Ed. Galloway Jr.R. L.), 2004, vol. 5367, pp. 829–836 (SPIE).
13.
MitraN. J.NguyenA.GuibasL.‘Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data.’Int. J. Comp. Geometry & Applic.14 (4–5) (2004): 261–276
14.
PopovicA.Knowledge-based segmentation of calvarial tumours with automatic parameter screening PhD Thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, RWTH-Aachen, Germany, 2008.
15.
ElahiM. M.‘A new predictive modality of cranial bone thickness.’Annls Plast. Surg.46 (6) (1999): 651–657
16.
WeberG. W.‘Thickness mapping of occipital bone on CT-data — a new approach applied on OH 9.’Acta Anthropologica Sinica19 (2000): 37–46
17.
PopovicA.‘Robot milling path generation in calvarial tumour surgery.’ Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Biomedizinische Technik BMT 2007 vol. 41, 2007.
18.
19.
LeeM. Y.‘Custom implant design for patients with cranial defects.’IEEE Engng Med. Biol. Mag.21 (2) (2002): 38–44
20.
SimonD. A.Fast and accurate shape-based registration PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996.
21.
HegerS.‘User-interactive registration of bone with A-mode ultrasound.’IEEE Engng Med. Biol. Mag.24 (2) (2005): 85–95
22.
PopovicA.‘Efficient non-invasive registration with A-mode ultrasound in skull surgery: method and first clinical trials.’ In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computer assisted radiology and surgery, international congress series
23.
PopovicA. ‘Medical robotics, 2008, Chapter on efficient non-invasive registration with A-mode ultrasound in skull surgery’: 341–351
24.
MaurerC. R.‘AcouStick: a tracked A-mode ultrasonography system for registration in image-guided surgery.’ Proceedings of MICCAI 1999; Lecture Notes in Computer Science1999, vol. 1679, pp. 953–962.
25.
FietenL.‘Fast and accurate registration of cranial CT images with A-mode-ultrasound.’Int. J. Computer Assisted Radiol. Surg.3 (1) (2008): 275–276
26.
BrandtG.‘CRIGOS: A compact robot for image guided orthopaedic interventions.’IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed.3 (4) (1999): 252–260
27.
BastP.‘Approaches towards optimized robot kinematics for surgical applications.’ In Proceedings of Mechatronics and Robotics (Ed. DrewsP.), 2004, pp. 1436–1440 (European Centre for Mechatronics)
28.
TroccazJ.PeshkinM.DaviesB.‘Guiding systems for computer-assisted surgery: Introducing synergistic devices and discussing the different approaches.’Med. Image Analysis2 (2) (1998): 101–119
29.
SheridanT. B.Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control (MIT PressCambridge, MA1992)
30.
TaylorR.StoianoviciD.‘Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery.’IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automn19 (2003): 765–781
31.
GerovichevO.MarayongP.OkamuraA.‘The effect of visual and haptic feedback on manual and teleoperated needle insertion.’MICCAI1 (2002): 147–154
32.
ScheidtR.‘Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements.’J. Neurophysiol93 (6) (2005): 3200–3213
33.
ErbseS.‘Development of an automatic surgical holding system based on ergonomic analysis.’ Proceedings of CVRMed/MRCAS'97, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, 1997, vol. 1205, pp. 737–746.
34.
DavisH.BookW.‘Torque control of a redundantly actuated passive manipulator.’ Proceedings of AACC Conference, 1997, vol. 2, pp. 959–963.
35.
ColgateJ. E.PeshkinM.MooreC.‘Passive robots and haptic displays based on nonholonomic elements.’Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and automation1 (1996): 551–556
WuT.‘Anatomically constrained deformation for design of cranial implant: Methodology and validation.’In MICCAI 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Ed. LarsenR. et al.) 2006, vol. 4190, pp. 9–16 (Springer, New York).
41.
WilesA. D.‘Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems.’Medical imaging 2004: visualization, image-guided procedures, and display (2004) vol. 5367, pp. 421–432 (SPIE).
