This article presents the effects of the frontal and rear-end impact loadings on the cervical spine components by using a multi-body dynamic model of the head and neck, and a viscoelastic finite element (FE) model of the six cervical intervertebral discs. A three-dimensional multi-body model of the human head and neck is used to simulate 15 g frontal and 8.5 g rear-end impacts. The load history at each intervertebral joint from the predictions of the multi-body model is used as dynamic loading boundary conditions for the FE model of the intervertebral discs. The results from the multi-body model simulations, such as the intervertebral disc loadings in the form of compressive, tensile, and shear forces and moments, and from the FE analysis such as the von Mises stresses in the intervertebral discs are analysed. This study shows that the proposed approach that uses dynamic loading conditions from the multi-body model as input to the FE model has the potential to investigate the kinetics and the kinematics of the cervical spine and its components together with the biomechanical response of the intervertebral discs under the complex dynamic loading history.
AveryM.GiblenE.WeekesA. M.ZubyD.‘Developments in dynamic whiplash assessment procedures.’ In Proceedings of the Conference on Neck Injuries in Road Traffic and Prevention Strategies, Munich, Germany 5–6 November 2007 14 pp.
HellW.LangwiederK.MoorahrendU.CastroW.HartwigE.SchelterR.ThodenU.‘Standard documentation form for basic diagnostics of cervical spine distortion injuries.’ In Proceedings of the Whiplash Associated Disorders World Conference, Bern, Switzerland 2001.
5.
ReberJ. G.GoldsmithW.‘Analysis of large head-neck motions.’J. Biomechanics12 (1979): 211–222
6.
MerrillT.GoldsmithW.DengY.-C.‘Three dimensional response of a lumped parameter head– neck model due to impact and impulsive loading.’J. Biomechanics17 (2) (1984): 81–95
7.
DengY. C.GoldsmithW.‘Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading — II. Analytical/numerical model.’J. Biomechanics20 (5) (1987): 471–486
8.
De JagerM. K. J.‘Mathematical head—neck models for acceleration impacts.’ PhD Thesis, Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1996.
9.
van der HorstM. J.ThunnsissenJ. G. M.HappeeR.Van HaasterR. M. H. P.WismansJ. S. H. M.‘The influence of muscle activity on the head-neck response during impact.’ In Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper 973346 1997, pp. 487–508.
10.
van der HorstM. J.‘Human head neck response in frontal, lateral and rear end impact loading — modelling and validation.’ PhD Thesis, Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2002.
11.
DauvilliersF.BendjellalF.WeissM.LavasteF.TarriereC.‘Development of a finite element model of the neck.’ In Proceedings of the 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper 942210 1994, pp. 77–91.
12.
NitscheS.KrabbelG.AppelH.HaugE.‘Validation of a finite-element-model of the human neck.’ In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Biomechanics of impact (IRCOBI), Dublin, Ireland, 11–13 September 1996, pp. 107–122 (International Research Council on the Biomimetics of ImpactsBron).
13.
YangK. H.ZhuF.LuanF.ZhaoL.BegemanP. C.‘Development of a finite element model of the human neck.’ In Proceedings of the 42nd Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper 983157 1998, pp. 195–205.
14.
KumaresanS.YoganandanN.PintarF. A.MaimanD. J.‘Finite element modeling of the cervical spine: Role of intervertebral disc under axial and eccentric loads.’Med. Engng Physics21 (1999): 689–700
15.
KumaresanS.YoganandanN.PintarF. A.‘Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: A material property sensitivity study.’Clin. Biomechanics14 (1999): 41–53
16.
KumaresanS.YoganandanN.PintarF. A.MaimanD. J.GoelV. K.‘Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: A biomechanical investigation.’J. Orthop. Res.19 (2001): 977–984
17.
NgH. W.TeoE. C.LeeV. S.‘Statistical factorial analysis on the material property sensitivity of the mechanical responses of the C4–C6 under compression, anterior and posterior shear.’J. Biomechanics37 (2004): 771–777
18.
YoganandanN.KumaresanS.PintarF. A.‘Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2: Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modelling.’Clin. Biomechanics16 (2001): 1–27
19.
SchmittK.-U.MuserM. H.WalzF. H.NiedererP. F.‘Fluid—structure interaction in the biomechanics of soft tissue neck injuries: A finite element study to analyze blood vessel pressure effects in the venous plexus.’Traffic Injury Prev.3 (2002): 65–73
20.
van LopikD. W.AcarM.‘Development of a multi-body computational model of human head and neck.’Proc. IMechE, Part K: J. Multi-body Dynamics221 (2) (2007): 175–197
21.
CamachoD. L.NightingaleR. W.RobinetteJ. J.VanguriS. K.CoatesD. J.MyersB. S.‘Experimental flexibility measurements for the development of a computational head—neck model validated for near-vertex head impact.’ In Proceedings of the 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper 973345, 1997, pp. 473–486.
22.
YoganandanN.KumaresanS.PintarF. A.‘Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments.’J. Biomech. Engng122 (2000): 623–629
23.
ChengE. J.BrownI. E.LoebG. E.‘Virtual muscle: A computational approach to understanding the effects of muscle properties on motor control.’J. Neurosci. Meth.101 (2000): 117–130
24.
WintersJ. M.WooS. L.-Y.Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization (Springer-Verlag1990)
25.
JohnsonG.BogdukN.NowitzkeA.HouseD.‘Anatomy and actions of the trapezius muscle.’Clin. Biomechanics9 (1994): 44–50
26.
KamibayashiL. K.RichmondF. J. R.‘Morphometry of human neck muscles.’Spine23 (12) (1998): 1314–1323
27.
RichmondF. J. R.SinghK.CorneilB. D.‘Neck muscles in the rhesus monkey I. Muscle morphometry and histochemistry.’J. Neurosci.86 (2001): 1717–1728
28.
Boyd-ClarkeL. C.BriggsC. A.GaleaM. P.‘Comparative histochemical composition of muscle fibres in a pre- and a postvertebral muscle of the cervical spine.’J. Anat.199 (2001): 709–716
29.
VasavadaA. N.LiS.DelpS. L.‘Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles.’Spine23 (4) (1998): 412–422
30.
van LopikD. W.AcarM.‘Dynamic verification of a multi-body computational model of human head and neck for frontal, lateral, and rear impacts.’Proc. IMechE, Part K: J. Multi-body Dynamics221 (2) (2007): 199–217
31.
PanjabiM. M.DuranceauJ.GoelV.OxlandT.TakataK.‘Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions.’Spine16 (8) (1992): 861–869
32.
NissanM.GiladI.‘The cervical and lumbar vertebrae and anthropometric model.’Engng Medicine13 (3) (1984): 111–114
33.
TeoE. C.NgH. W.‘Evaluation of the role of ligaments, facets and disc nucleus in lower cervical spine under compression and sagittal moments using finite element method.’Med. Engng Physics23 (2001): 155–164
34.
LeeC.-K.KimY. E.LeeC.-S.HongY.-M.JungJ.-M.GoelV. K.‘Impact response of the intervertebral disc in a finite-element model.’Spine25 (19) (2000): 2431–2439
35.
WangJ.-L.ParnianpourM.Shirazi-AdlA.EnginA. E.‘Viscoelastic finite-element analysis of a lumbar motion segment in combined compression and sagittal flexion: Effect of loading rate.’Spine25 (3) (2000): 310–318
