Numerical simulation is increasingly being used to predict the flowfield within patient-specific geometries of abdominal aortic aneurysms under physiologically realistic flow conditions. This paper reports on a comparison between the flowfield measured in vitro within a patient-specific model of a mature abdominal aortic aneurysm and that predicted using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Visualization and traverses of axial velocity were obtained at a number of locations in the aneurysm region under both steady and physiologically realistic pulsatile flow conditions. Comparisons between the measured and predicted flowfield show good agreement throughout the aneurysm. Although turbulence was observed distal in the aneurysm during late diastole, best agreement was achieved using a simple laminar flow model.
StehbensW. E.Flow disturbances in glass models of aneurysms at low Reynolds numbers. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. Cogn. Med. Sci., 1974, 59(2), 167–174.
2.
BudwigR.ElgerD.HooperH.SlippyJ.Steady flow in abdominal aortic aneurysm models. J. Biomech. Engng, 1993, 115(4A), 418–423.
3.
TaylorT. W.YamaguchiT.Three-dimensional simulation of blood flow in an abdominal aortic aneurysm - steady and unsteady flow cases. J. Biomech. Engng, 1994, 116(1), 89–97.
4.
BluesteinD.NiuL.SchoephoersterR. T.DewanjeeM. K.Steady flow in an aneurysm model: Correlation between fluid dynamics and blood platelet deposition. J. Biomech. Engng, 1996, 118(3), 280–286.
5.
FukushimaT.MatsuzawaT.HommaT.Visualization and finite element analysis of pulsatile flow in models of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Biorheology, 1989, 26(2), 109–130.
6.
PeattieR. A.AsburyC. L.BluthE. I.RiehleT. J.Steady flow in models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Part II: Wall stresses and their implication for in vivo thrombosis and rupture. J. Ultrasound Med., 1996, 15(10), 689–696.
7.
PeattieR. A.AsburyC. L.BluthE. I.RubertiJ. W.Steady flow in models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Part I: Investigation of the velocity patterns. J. Ultrasound Med., 1996, 15(10), 679–688.
8.
EgelhoffC. J.BudwigR. S.ElgerD. F.KhraishiT. A.JohansenK. H.Model studies of the flow in abdominal aortic aneurysms during resting and exercise conditions. J. Biomechanics, 1999, 32(12), 1319–1329.
9.
YuS. C.ChanW. K.NgB. T.ChuaL. P.A numerical investigation on the steady and pulsatile flow characteristics in axi-symmetric abdominal aortic aneurysm models with some experimental evaluation. J. Med. Engng Technol., 1999, 23(6), 228–239.
10.
YuS. C. M.Steady and pulsatile flow studies in abdominal aortic aneurysm models using particle image velocimetry. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, 2000, 21(1), 74–83.
11.
YipT. H.YuS. C. M.Cyclic transition to turbulence in rigid abdominal aortic aneurysm models. Fluid Dynamics Res., 2001, 29(2), 81–113.
12.
YipT. H.YuS. C.Cyclic flow characteristics in an idealized asymmetric abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2003, 217(1), 27–39.
13.
PeattieR. A.RiehleT. J.BluthE. I.Pulsatile flow in fusiform models of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Flow fields, velocity patterns and flow-induced wall stresses. J. Biomech. Engng, 2004, 126(4), 438–446.
14.
SalsacA. V.SparksS. R.LasherasJ. C.Hemodynamic changes occurring during the progressive enlargement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann. Vasc. Surg., 2004, 18(1), 14–21.
15.
AtkinsonS. J.FellerK. J.PeattieR. A.Measurement of fluid flow patterns and wall shear-stresses in patient-based models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. ASME BED Bioengineering Conference, Snowbird, Utah, 2001.
16.
FellerK. J.AtkinsonS. J.PeattieR. A.Quantification of flow stability in patient-based models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. ASME BED Bioengineering Conference, Snowbird, Utah, 2001.
17.
Di MartinoE. S.GuadagniG.FumeroA.BalleriniG.SpiritoR.BiglioliP.RedaelliA.Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Med. Engng Phys., 2001, 23(9), 647–655.
18.
FinolE. A.KeyhaniK.AmonC. H.The effect of asymmetry in abdominal aortic aneurysms under physiologically realistic pulsatile flow conditions. J. Biomech. Engng, 2003, 125(2), 207–217.
19.
WoltersB. J.RuttenM. C.SchurinkG. W.KoseU.de HartJ.van de VosseF. N.A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med. Engng Phys., 2005, 27(10), 871–883.
20.
McCulloughJ.Haemodynamics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison between idealised and patient-based models. PhD Thesis, University College Dublin, Ireland, 2006.
21.
MillsC. J.GabeI. T.GaultJ. H.MasonD. T.RossJ.Jr.BraunwaldE.ShillingfordJ. P.Pressure-flow relationships and vascular impedance in man. Cardiovasc. Res., 1970, 4(4), 405–417.
22.
MooreJ. E.Jr.KuD. N.Pulsatile velocity measurements in a model of the human abdominal aorta under resting conditions. J. Biomech. Engng, 1994, 116(3), 337–346.
23.
PedersenE. M.SungH. W.BurlsonA. C.YoganathanA. P.Two-dimensional velocity measurements in a pulsatile flow model of the normal abdominal aorta simulating different hemodynamic conditions. J. Biomechanics, 1993, 26(10), 1237–1247.
