Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty

Abstract

The orientation of the femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty affects the likelihood of loosening and fracture. Computer-assisted surgery has been shown to improve significantly the surgeon's ability to achieve a desired position and orientation; nevertheless, both bias and variability in positioning remain and can potentially be improved. The authors recently developed a computer-assisted surgical (CAS) technique to guide the placement of the pin used in femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty and showed that it produced significantly less variation than a typical manual technique in varus/valgus placement relative to a pre-operatively determined surgical plan while taking a comparable amount of time. In the present study, the repeatability of both the CAS and manual techniques is evaluated in order to estimate the relative contributions to overall variability of surgical technique (CAS versus manual), surgeon experience (novice versus experienced), and other sources of variability (e.g. across specimens and across surgeons). This will enable further improvements in the accuracy of CAS techniques.

Three residents/fellows new to femoral head resurfacing and three experienced hip arthroplasty surgeons performed 20-30 repetitions of each of the CAS and manual techniques on at least one of four cadaveric femur specimens. The CAS system had markedly better repeatability (1.2°) in varus/valgus placement relative to the manual technique (2.8°), slightly worse repeatability in version (4.4° versus 3.2°), markedly better repeatability in mid-neck placement (0.7 mm versus 2.5 mm), no significant dependence on surgeon skill level (in contrast to the manual technique), and took significantly less time (50 s versus 123 s). Proposed improvements to the version measurement process showed potential for reducing the standard deviation by almost two thirds.

This study supports the use of CAS for femoral head resurfacing as it is quicker than the manual technique, independent of surgeon experience, and demonstrates improved repeatability.

Keywords

femoral head resurfacing hip arthroplasty computer-assisted surgery repeatability accuracy hip osteoarthritis resurfacing registration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amstutz

H. C.

Beaule

P. E.

Dorey

F. J.

Le Duff

M. J.

Campbell

P. A.

Gruen

T. A.

Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: Two to six-year follow-up study

J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 2004, 86 (1), 28–39.

Beaule

P. E.

Amstutz

H. C.

Le Duff

Dorey

Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: Hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing

J. Arthroplasty, 2004, 19 (8, Suppl. 3), 54–58.

Daniel

Pynsent

P. B.

McMinn

D. J.

Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis

J. Bone Jt Surg. Br., 2004, 86 (2), 177–184.

Treacy

R. B.

McBryde

C. W.

Pynsent

P. B.

Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years

J. Bone Jt Surg. Br., 2005, 87 (2), 167–170.

Hodgson

A. J.

Inkpen

K. B.

Shekhman

Anglin

C. A.

Tonetti

Masri

B. A.

Duncan

C. P.

Garbuz

D. S.

Greidanus

N. V.

Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing

Computer Aided Surg., 2005, 10 (5), 337–343.

Shekman

Masri

B. A.

Greidanus

N. V.

Garbuz

D. S.

Duncan

C. P.

Anglin

Hodgson

A. J.

Inkpen

K. B.

Variability of femoral positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. In the 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, DC, 20–23 February 2005.

McMinn

Treacy

Lin

Pynsent

Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis

Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1996, 329 (Suppl.), S89–98.

Anglin

Masri

B. A.

Tonetti

Hodgson

A. J.

Greidanus

N. V.

Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement

Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 2007 (in press).

Long

J. P.

Bartel

D. L.

Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system

Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 2006, 453, 115–122.

10.

Mont

M. A.

Rajadhyaksha

A. D.

Hungerford

D. S.

Outcomes of limited femoral resurfacing arthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head

J. Arthroplasty, 2001, 16 (8, Suppl. 1), 134–139.

11.

Mont

Bezweda

Thomas

Etienne

The results of metal on metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: learning curve stratification of results. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Washington DC, 22–27 February 2005.

12.

Back

D. L.

Smith

J. D.

Dalziel

R. E.

et al. Establishing a learning curve for hip resurfacing. In American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 74th Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, 14–18 February 2007.

13.

Hess

Gampe

Köttgen

Szawlowski

Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing: Methods and first results (in German)

Der Orthopäde, 2004, 33 (10), 1183–1193.

14.

Barrett

A. R.

Davies

B. L.

Gomes

M. P.

Harris

S. J.

Henckel

Jakopec

Rodriguez y Baena

F. M.

Cobb

J. P.

Preoperative planning and intra-operative guidance for accurate computer-assisted minimally invasive hip resurfacing surgery

Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2006, 220 (H7), 759–773.

15.

Harris

S. J.

Barrett

A. R. W.

Jakopec

Dandachli

Cobb

J. P.

Davies

B. L.

Computer assisted planning for hip resurfacing replacement surgery. In the 5th Annual Meeting of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery International, Helsinki, Finland, 19–22 June 2005.

16.

Long

W. J.

Rudan

Ellis

R. E.

Computer aided hip resurfacing arthroplasty. In the 5th Annual Meeting of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery International, Helsinki, Finland, 19–22 June 2005.

17.

Sugano

Nishii

Kahahodo

Sasama

Sato

Tamura

Sakai

K. T.

Haraguchi

Nishihara

Ozono

Yodenobu

Yoshikawa

Ochi

Combined acetabular and femoral navigation for resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. In Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, San Francisco, California, 2000, pp. 226–230.

18.

Zambelli

P. Y.

Brégand

C. H.

Dewarrat

S. T.

Marti

G. S.

Baur

C. H.

Leyvarz

P. F.

Planning and navigation solution in resurfacing hip surgery — a way to reduce the surgical approach. In Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, Marbella, Spain, 2003.

19.

Wacek

Boyle

Techniques of computer assisted surgery applied to metal on metal hip resurfacing procedures. In Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology (IRL), 2003.

20.

Davis

E. T.

Gallie

MacGroarty

Waddell

J. P.

Schemitsch

E. H.

The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: A cadaver study

J. Bone Jt Surg. Br., 2007, 89 (4), 557–560.

21.

Muller

Bracke

Dick

Automatic detection of femoral neck axes for hip resurfacing surgeries. In the 5th Annual Meeting of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery International, Helsinki, Finland, 19–22 June 2005.