Aseptic loosening of the prosthesis is still a problem in artificial joint implants. The loosening can be caused by, among other factors, resorption of the bone surrounding the prosthesis owing to stress shielding. In order to find out the influence of the prosthesis type on post-operative stress shielding, a static finite element analysis of a femur provided with the conventional uncemented stem BICONTACT and of one with the femoral neck prosthesis SPIRON was carried out. Strain energy densities and maximal principal strain distributions were calculated and compared with the physiological situation. Here, stress shielding was demonstrated in both periprosthetic femora. To determine the areas of the stress shielding, the bone in each FE model was subdivided into three regions of interest (ROI): proximal, diaphyseal, and distal. The numerical computations show stress shielding in the proximal ROI of both periprosthetic femora. Diaphyseally, the femoral neck prosthesis SPIRON, in contrast to the conventional uncemented long-stem prosthesis BICONTACT, causes no decrease in the strain distribution and thus no stress shielding. Distally, no change in the load distribution of either periprosthetic femur could be found, compared with the physiological situation.
AdamF.JohnD.Computergestützte Entwicklung eines anatomischen Hüftprothesenschaftes. Magazin Forsch., 2000, 1, 41–48.
2.
SumnerD. R.GalanteJ. O.Determinants of stress shielding. Clinical Orthop. and Related Res., 1992, 274, 203–212.
3.
WolffJ.Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen, 1892 (Hirschwald, Berlin).
4.
ArabmotlaghM.HennigsT.RittmeisterM.Femoral periprosthetic bone remodelling to the proximal femur after implantation of custom made anatomic and standard straight stem hip prostheses. Z. Orthop. Grenzgeb., 2003, 141, 519–525.
5.
BerghM. S.MuirP.MarkelM. D.ManleyP. A.Femoral bone adaptation to stable long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs. Vet. Surg., 2004, 33, 214–220.
6.
SilvaM. J.ReedK. L.RobertsonD. D.BragdonC.HarrisW. H.MaloneyW. J.Reduced bone stress as predicted by composite beam theory correlates with cortical bone loss following cemented total hip arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res., 1999, 17, 525–531.
7.
TurnerA. W.GilliesR. M.SekelR.MorrisP.BruceW.WalshW. R.Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparisons with DEXA results. J. Orthop. Res., 2005, 23, 705–712.
8.
GerversM.NolteI.AltF.HauschildG.Meyer-LindenbergA.FehrM.Complications after implantation of a modular total hip prostheses compared with fixed head prostheses. Berl. Münchener Tierarztl. Wochenschr., 2002, 115, 412–419.
9.
SenapatiS. K.PalS.Finite element analysis: An effective tool for prostheses design. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organ, 2004, 17, 141–148.
10.
PrendergastP. J.TaylorD.Stress analysis of the proximo-medial femur after total hip replacement. J. Biomed. Engng, 1990, 12, 379–382.
11.
MattheckC.VorbergU.KranzC.Effects of hollow shaft endoprosthesis on stress distribution in cortical bone. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.), 1990, 35, 316–319.
12.
TaylorM.TannerK. E.FreemanM. A.YettramA. L.Cancellous bone stresses surrounding the femoral component of a hip prosthesis: An elastic-plastic finite element analysis. Med. Engng and Phys., 1995, 17, 544–550.
13.
TaiC. L.ShihC. H.ChenW. P.LeeS. S.LiuY. L.HsiehP. H.Finite element analysis of the cervico-trochanteric stemless femoral prosthesis. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol Avon), 2003, 18, S53–S58.
14.
YoonH. S.KatzJ. L.Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cortical bone - II. Measurements of elastic properties and microhardness. J. Biomech., 1976, 9, 459–464.
15.
BiniF.MarinozziA.MarinozziF.PatanèF.Microtensile measurements of single trabeculae stiffness in human femur. J. Biomech., 2002, 35, 1515–1519.
16.
DudaG. N.HellerM.AlbingerJ.SchulzO.SchneiderE.ClaesL.Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J. Biomech., 1998, 31, 841–846.
17.
HellerM. O.BergmannG.KassiJ. P.ClaesL.HaasN. P.DudaG. N.Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J. Biomech., 2005, 38, 1155–1163.
18.
HuiskesR.WeinansH.VanR. B.The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin. Orthop., 1992, 124–134.
19.
FernandesP. R.FolgadoJ.JacobsC.PellegriniV.A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems. J. Biomech., 2002, 35, 167–176.
20.
WeinansH.HuiskesR.GrootenboerH. J.Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. J. Orthop. Res., 1992, 10, 845–853.
21.
GoetzenN.LampeF.NassutR.MorlockM. M.Load-shift-numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses. J. Biomech., 2005, 38, 595–604.
22.
VicecontiM.AnsaloniM.BaleaniM.ToniA.The muscle standardized femur: A step forward in the replication of numerical studies in biomechanics. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2003, 217, 105–110.
23.
PolgárK.GillH. S.VicecontiM.MurrayD. W.O'ConnorJ. J.Strain distribution within the human femur due to physiological and simplified loading: Finite element analysis using the muscle standardized femur model. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2003, 217, 173–189.
24.
TaylorW. R.PloegH.HertigD.WarnerM. D.CliftS. E.Bone remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: An in vitro case. Computer Meth. in Biomechanics and Biomed. Engng, 2004, 3, 131–137.
25.
WirtzD. C.PandorfT.PortheineF.RadermacherK.SchiffersN.PrescherA.Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur. J. Biomech., 2003, 36, 289–293.
26.
TaylorW. R.RolandE.PloegH.HertigD.KlabundeR.WarnerM. D.Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis. J. Biomech., 2002, 35, 767–773.
27.
KabelJ.VanR. B.DalstraM.OdgaardA.HuiskesR.The role of an effective isotropic tissue modulus in the elastic properties of cancellous bone. J. Biomech., 1999, 32, 673–680.
28.
FritzS. T.VolkmannR.WinterE.BretschneiderC.The BICONTACT hip endoprosthesis - a universal system for hip arthroplasty for traumatic and idiopathic indications: Results after 10 years. Eur. J. Trauma - E - Supplement, 2001, 1, S18–S22.
29.
TaiC. L.LeeM. S.ChenW. P.HsiehP. H.LiuY. L.Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis - an experimental study. Bio-Med. Mater. Engng, 2003, 15, 239–249.
30.
LengsfeldM.BurchardR.GuntherD.PresselT.SchmittJ.LeppekR.Femoral strain changes after total hip arthroplasty - patient-specific finite element analyses 12 years after operation. Med. Engng and Phys., 2005, 27, 649–654.
