A study was undertaken to determine the applicability of a multivariate discriminant technique in order to analyse human kinematic data, specifically lumbar motion during forward flexion. This method was used in an attempt to allow comparison of time-series data (three joint angles and three linear displacements) between groups of subjects. Results obtained from ten healthy subjects performing simulated abnormal styles of forward flexion indicate the feasibility and potential utility of this method in a clinical environment. Further investigations will be undertaken on clinical subjects to discriminate more effectively between healthy and pathological movements.
FaceyO. E.HannahI. D.RosenD.Analysis of the reproducibility and individuality of dynamic pedobaro-graphic images. J. Med. Engng Technol., 1993, 17 (1), 9–15.
2.
GioftosG.GrieveD. W.The use of neural networks to recognize patterns of human movement: Gait patterns. Clin. Biomechanics, 1995, 10 (4), 179–183.
3.
GioftosG.GrieveD. W.The use of artificial neural networks to identify patients with chronic low-back pain conditions from patterns of sit-to-stand manoeuvres. Clin. Biomechanics, 1996, 11 (5), 275–280.
4.
VaskoR.BostonI. R.El-JaroudiA.RudyT. E.Multi-dimensional time series model of repetitive dynamic lifting. Proc. Annual Conf. Engng Med. Biol., IEEE, 1993, 15 (3), 1175–1176.
5.
PriezA.DucheneJ.GoubelF.Duchenne muscular dystrophy quantification: A multivariate analysis of surface EMG. Med. Biol. Engng Comput., 1992, 30 (3), 283–291.
6.
DeluzioK. J.WyssU. P.ZeeB.CostiganP. A.SorbieC.Principal component models of knee kinematics and kinetics: Normal vs. pathological gait patterns. Human Movement Sci., 1997, 16, 201–217.
7.
PearcyM. J.HindleR. J.New method for the noninvasive three-dimensional measurement of human back movement. Clin. Biomechanics, 1989, 4 (1), 73–79.
8.
HindleR. J.PearcyM. J.CrossA. T.MillerD. H. T.Three-dimensional kinematics of the human back. Clin. Biomechanics, 1990, 5 (4), 218–228.
MollJ. M.H.WrightV.Normal range of spinal mobility: An objective clinical study. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 1971, 30, 381–386.
11.
AlbertA.Discriminant analysis based on multivariate response curves: A descriptive approach to dynamic allocation. Stat. Med., 1983, 2, 95–106.
12.
AlbertA.HarrisE.Multivariate interpretation of clinical laboratory data. In Statistics, Textbooks and Monographs, Vol. 75, 1987 (Marcel Dekker, New York).
13.
ZerbeG. O.Randomization analysis of the completely randomized design extended to growth and response curves. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1979, 74 (365), 215–221.
