Poly (methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement, used to fix implants into the bone, produces good surgical results if used correctly. However, prostheses do eventually become loose and the breakdown of the cement mantle is a factor in this failure. Limitations of PMMA cement, which lead to problems with the fixation of the implant, include its mechanical characteristics and its influence upon surrounding bone, associated with the polymerization reaction. A bioactive bone cement is particularly designed to produce a better interface between the cement and bone. However, an improvement in mechanical properties, especially fatigue, creep and fracture toughness, are an added necessary requirement to increase the lifetime of a cemented implant. The development of a bioactive cement has been conducted mainly in two ways; firstly, to improve existing PMMA cement by the addition of various bioactive agents and secondly, to design an alternative matrix for the bioactive material to be combined with. The most promising investigations which have been conducted, along with their relative benefits and drawbacks, are discussed.
AmstutzH. C.GruenT.Clinical application of poly-methylmethacrylate for total joint replacement. In Current Practice of Orthopaedic Surgery (Ed. AhstromJ. P.), 1973, pp. 158–182 (CV Mosby Company, St Louis, USA).
2.
LautenschlagerE. P.StuppS. I.KellerJ. C.Structure and properties of acrylic bone cement. In Functional Behaviour of Orthopaedic Biomaterial, Vol. II Applications, Series in Structure Property Relationship of Biomaterial, 1987, pp. 87–117 (CRC).
3.
Materials Technology Foresight in Biomaterials, Materials Strategy Commission Report of a Working Party of the Institute of Materials, May 1995 (Institute of Materials).
4.
GruenT. A.McNeiceG. M.AmstutzH. C.Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral component. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 1979, 141, 17–27.
5.
StaufferR. N.Ten year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1982, 64-A, 983–989.
6.
AnthonyP. P.GieG. A.HowieC. R.LingR. S. M.Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1990, 72-B, 971–979.
7.
OonishiH.Bioactive bone cements. In The Bone-Biomaterial Interface (Ed. DaviesJ. E.), 1991, pp. 321–333 (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada).
8.
HenchL.WilsonJ.An Introduction to Bioceramics, 1993 (World Scientific, Singapore).
9.
PosnerA. S.The chemistry of bone mineral. Bull. Hosp. Jt Diseases, 1978, 39, 126–144.
10.
MoroniA.CajaV. J.EggerE. L.TrincheseL.ChaoE. Y. S.Histomorphometry of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated porous titanium bone implants. Biomaterials, 1994, 15, 926–930.
11.
PinholtE. M.RuyterI. E.HaanaesH. R.BangG.Chemical, physical and histologic studies on four commercial apatites used for alveolar ridge augmentation. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 1992, 50, 859–867.
12.
OlmiR.MoroniA.CastaldiniA.RomagnoliR.Hydroxyapatite alloyed with bone cement: Physical and biological characterisation. In Ceramics in Surgery (Ed. VincenziniP.), 1983, pp. 91–96 (Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
13.
CastaldiniA.CavalliniA.MoroniA.OlmiR.Young's modulus of hydroxyapatite mixed bone cement. In Biomaterials and Biomechanics (Eds DucheyneP.Van der PerreG.AubertA. E.), 1984, pp. 427–432 (Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
14.
CastaldiniA.CavalliniA.Setting properties of bone cement with added synthetic hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials, 1985, 6, 55–60.
15.
CastaldiniA.CavalliniA.Creep behaviour of composite bone cement. In Biological and Biomedical Performance of Biomaterials (Eds ChristelP.MeunierA.LeeA. J. C.), 1986, pp. 525–530 (Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
16.
SogalA.HulbertS. F.Mechanical properties of a composite bone cement: Polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium onCeramics in Medicine, Bioceramics, 1992, Vol. 5, pp. 213–224.
17.
DoveJ. H.HulbertS. F.Fatigue properties of a polymethylmethacrylate-hydroxyapatite composite bone cement. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium onApatite, Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
18.
MurakamiA.BehiriJ.BonfieldW.HAP fibre reinforced bone cement. In Phase Interaction in Composite Material (Eds PaipetisS. A.PapanicolaouG. C.), 1992, pp. 460–466 (Omega Scientific).
19.
HeikkilaJ. T.AhoA. J.KangasniemiI.Yli-UrpoA.Polymethylmethacrylate composites: Disturbed bone formation at the surface of bioactive glass and hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials, 1996, 17, 1755–1760.
20.
WilliamsJ. L.JohnsonW. J. H.Elastic constants of composites formed from PMMA bone cement and aniso-tropic bovine tibial cancellous bone. J. Biomechanics, 1989, 22, 673–682.
21.
LiuY. K.ParkJ. B.NjusG.StienstraD.Bone particle impregnated bone cement: An in vitro study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1987, 21, 247–261.
22.
ParkH. C.LiuY. K.LakesR. S.The material properties of bone particle impregnated PMMA. J. Biomech. Engng, 1986, 108, 141–148.
23.
DaiK. R.LiuY. K.ParkJ. B.ClarkC. R.NishiyamaK.ZhengZ. K.Bone particle impregnated bone cement: An in vivo weight-bearing study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1991, 25, 141–156.
24.
HenrichD. E.CramA. E.ParkJ. B.LuiY. K.ReddiH.Inorganic bone and demineralized bone matrix impregnated bone cement: A preliminary in vivo study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1993, 27, 277–280.
25.
DownesS.WoodD. J.MalcolmA. J.AliS. Y.Growth hormone in polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 1990, 252, 294–298.
26.
GoodwinC. J.BradenM.DownesS.MarshallN. J.A comparison between two methacrylate cements as delivery systems for bioactive human growth hormone. J. Mater. Sci., Mater. in Medicine, 1995, 6, 590–596.
27.
GoodwinC. J.BradenM.DownesS.MarshallN. J.Investigation into the release of bioactive recombinant human growth hormone from normal and low-viscosity poly (methylmethacrylate) bone cements. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1997, 34, 47–55.
28.
SaitoM.MaruokaA.ToshikazuM.SuganoN.HinoK.Experimental studies on a new bioactive bone cement: Hydroxyapatite composite resin. Biomaterials, 1994, 15, 156–160.
29.
SaitoM.MurakamiA.SuganoN.ShibuyaT.YamaguchiK.HinoK.OchiT.Biomechanical analysis of the femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty using bioactive bone cement. Proceedings of 8th International Symposium onCeramics in Medicine, Bioceramics, 1995, 8, 231–235.
30.
KawanabeK.TamuraJ.YamamuroT.NakamuraT.KokuboT.YoshiharaS.A new bioactive bone cement consisting of BIS-GMA resin and bioactive glass powder. J. Appl. Biomater., 1993, 4, 135–141.
31.
TamuraJ.KawanabeK.YamamuroT.NakamuraT.KokuboT.YoshiharaS.ShibuyaT.Bioactive bone cement: The effect of amounts of glass powder and histologic changes with time. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1995, 29, 551–559.
32.
TamuraJ.KitsugiT.FujitaH.NakamuraT.KokuboT.YoshiharaS.ShibuyaT.Bone-bonding behaviour of three types of bioactive bone cement containing bioactive glass or glass-ceramic powder. Proceedings of 8th International Symposium onCeramics in Medicine, Bioceramics, 1995, 8, 219–223.
33.
TamuraJ.KawanabeK.KobayashiM.NakamuraT.KokuboT.YoshiharaS.ShibuyaT.Mechanical and biological properties of two types of bioactive bone cements containing MgO-CaO-SiO2-P2O5-CaF2 glass and glass-ceramic powder. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1996, 30, 85–94.
34.
KokuboT.MoritaY.MiyajiF.NakanishiK.SogaN.NakamuraT.Bioactivity of bioactive filler-resin cement. Proceedings of 8th International Symposium onCeramics in Medicine, Bioceramics, 1995, 8, 213–217.
35.
KobayashiM.NakamuraT.TamuraJ.KawanabeK.KokuboT.KitutaniT.Bioactive bone cement: Comparison of AW-GC filler with hydroxyapatite and B-TCP fillers on biological properties. Proceedings of 8th International Symposium onCeramics in Medicine, Bioceramics, 1996, 9, 239–242.
36.
NishimuraN.YamamuroJ.TaguchiY.IkenagaM.NakamuraT.KokuboT.YoshiharaS.A new bioactive bone cement: Its histological and mechanical characterisation. J. Appl. Biomater., 1991, 2, 219–229.
37.
WeightmanB.FreemanM. A. R.RevellP. A.BradenM.AlbrektssonB. E.J.CarlsonL. V.The mechanical properties of cement and loosening of the femoral component of hip replacements. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1987, 69-B, 558–564.
38.
PatelM. P.BradenM.DavyK. W. M.Polymerisation shrinkage of methylmethacrylate esters. Biomaterials, 1987, 8, 53–56.
39.
DavyK. W.M.BradenM.Residual monomer in acrylic polymers. Biomaterials, 1991, 12, 540–544.
40.
RevellP.GeorgeM.BradenM.FreemanM.WeightmanB.Experimental studies of the biological response to a new bone cement: I Toxicity of n-butylmethacrylate monomer compared with methylmethacrylate monomer. J. Mater. Sci., Mater, in Medicine, 1992, 3, 84–87.
41.
RevellP.BradenM.WeightmanB.FreemanM.Experimental studies of the biological response to a new bone cement: II Soft tissue reactions in the rat. Clin. Mater., 1992, 10, 233–238.
42.
BehiriJ.BradenM.KhorasaniS. N.WiwattandateD.BonfieldW.Advanced bone cement for long term orthopaedic implantations. Proceedings of 4th International Symposium onCeramics in Medicine, Bioceramics, 1991, 4, 301–304.
43.
HarperE. J.BehiriJ. C.BonfleldW.Flexural and fatigue properties of a bone cement based upon polyethyl-methacrylate and hydroxyapatite. J. Mater. Sci., Mater, in Medicine, 1995, 6, 799–803.
44.
KhorasaniS. N.DebS.BehiriJ. C.BradenM.BonfieldW.Modified hydroxyapatite reinforced bone cement. Proceedings of 5th International Symposium onCeramics in Medicine, Bioceramics, 1992, 5, 225–232.
45.
HarperE. J.BradenM.BonfieldW.Fracture behaviour of composite bone cements: PMMA/BaSO4 and PEMA/HA. Proceedings of European Conference on Composite Materials, London, UK, May 1996, pp. 519–523.
46.
HarperE. J.Development and characterisation of a hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(ethylmethacrylate) bone cement. PhD thesis, University of London, UK, 1996.
47.
IshiharaK.AraiH.NakabayashiN.MonitaS.FuruyaK.Adhesive bone cement containing hydroxyapatite particle as bone compatible filler. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1992, 26, 937–945.
48.
LeeR. R.OgisoM.WatanabeA.IshiharaK.Examination of hydroxyapatite filled 4META/MMA-TBB adhesive bone cement in in vitro and in vivo environment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1997, 31, 11–16.
