The Ilizarov fixator has become widely used in the treatment of complex trauma and deformity correction in the United Kingdom over the last few decades. As such, it has been widely researched. Within this fixator, the characteristic fine wires are the weakest and most flexible component. The wires allow interfragmentary micromotion, which is believed to be beneficial to bone healing. In this paper, a novel and simple numerical model of the stiffness and deflection of the wires when the fixator is subject to axial and torsional loading is presented. A range of wire lengths and pretensions are analysed, and the results compared to the findings of other researchers, with generally good agreement. This indicates that fixator stiffness can be determined simply and without recourse to sophisticated finite element analyses or extensive physical testing. In addition, the model is used to predict the contribution of the wires to the overall stiffness of the fixator.
AronsonJ.HarpJ. H.Mechanical considerations in using tensioned wires in a transosseous external fixation systemClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1992, 280, 23–29.
2.
KenwrightJ.GoodshipA. E.Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fracturesClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1989, (241), 36–47.
3.
WolfJ. W.WhiteA. A.PanjabiM. M.SouthwickW. O.Comparison of cyclic loading versus constant compression in the treatment of long-bone fractures in rabbitsJ. Bone Jt Surg. (Am.), 1981, 63 (5), 805–810.
4.
WolfS.JanousekA.PfeilJ.VeithW.HaasF.DudaG.ClaesL.The effects of external mechanical stimulation on the healing of diaphyseal osteotomies fixed by flexible external fixationClin. Biomechanics, 1998, 13 (4–5), 359–364.
5.
GoodshipA. E.KenwrightJ.The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fracturesJ. Bone Jt Surg. (Br.), 1985, 67 (4), 650–655.
6.
IlizarovG. A.The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distractionClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1989, (239), 263–285.
7.
IlizarovG. A.The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservationClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1989, (238), 249–281.
8.
WaandersN. A.RichardsM.SteenH.KuhnJ. L.GoldsteinS. A.GouletJ. A.Evaluation of the mechanical environment during distraction osteogenesisClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1998, (349), 225–234.
9.
ClaesL. E.HeigeleC. A.Neidlinger-WilkeC.KasparD.SeidlW.MargeviciusK. J.AugatP.Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing processClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1998, (355 Suppl.), S132-S147.
10.
O'DohertyD. M.ButlerS. P.GoodshipA. E.Stress protection due to external fixationJ. Biomechanics, 1995, 28 (5), 575–586.
11.
SarmientoA.SchaefferJ. F.BeckermanL.LattaL. L.EnisJ. E.Fracture healing in rat femora as affected by functional weight-bearingJ. Bone Jt Surg. (Am.), 1977, 59 (3), 369–375.
12.
WatsonM. A.MathiasK. J.MaffulliN.HukinsD. W. L.The effect of clamping a tensioned wire: Implications for the Ilizarov external fixation systemProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2003, 217 (H2), 91–98.
13.
DelpreteC.GolaM. M.Mechanical performance of external fixators with wires for the treatment of bone fractures. Part II: Wire tension and slippageTrans ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1993, 115 (1), 37–42.
14.
CalhounJ. H.LiF.BaufordW. L.LehmanT.LedbetterB. R.LoweryR.Rigidity of half pins for the Ilizarov external fixatorBull. Hosp. Jt Dis., 1992, 52 (1), 21–26.
15.
WatsonM. A.MathiasK. J.MaffulliN.HukinsD. W. L.Yielding of the clamped-wire system in the Ilizarov external fixatorProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2003, 217 (H5), 367–374.
16.
BronsonD. G.SamchukovM. L.BirchJ. G.BrowneR. H.AshmanR. B.Stability of external circular fixation: A multi-variable biomechanical analysisClin. Biomechanics, 1998, 13 (6), 441–448.
17.
HillardP. J.HarrisonA. J.AtkinsR. M.The yielding of tensioned fine wires in the Ilizarov frameProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1998, 212 (H1), 37–47.
18.
OrbayG. L.FrankelV. H.KummerF. J.The effect of wire configuration on the stability of the Ilizarov external fixatorClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1992, 279, 299–302.
19.
DudaG. N.SchneiderE.ChaoE. Y. S.Internal forces and moments in the femur during walkingJ. Biomechanics, 1997, 30 (9), 933–941.
20.
SimpsonA. H.CunninghamJ. L.KenwrightJ.The forces which develop in the tissues during leg lengthening. A clinical studyJ. Bone Jt Surg. (Br.), 1996, 78 (6), 979–983.
21.
PodolskyA.ChaoE. Y.Mechanical performance of Ilizarov circular external fixators in comparison with other external fixatorsClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1993, (293), 61–70.
22.
GasserB.BomanB.WyderD.SchneiderE.Stiffness characteristics of the circular Ilizarov device as opposed to conventional external fixatorsJ. Biomech. Engng, 1990, 112 (1), 15–21.
23.
KhalilyC.VoorM. J.SeligsonD.Fracture site motion with Ilizarov and `hybrid external fixationJ. Orthop. Trauma, 1998, 12 (1), 21–26.
24.
FarrarM.YangL.SalehM.The Sheffield hybrid fixator - a clinical and biomechanical reviewInjury, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 4), 8–13.
25.
KenwrightJ.GardnerT.Mechanical influences on tibial fracture healingClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1998, (355 Suppl), S179-S190.
26.
PerrenS. M.Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixationClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1979, (138), 175–196.
27.
FlemingB.PaleyD.KristiansenT.PopeM.A biomechanical analysis of the Ilizarov external fixatorClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1989, (241), 95–105.
28.
CalhounJ. H.LiF.LedbetterB. R.GillC. A.Biomechanics of the Ilizarov fixator for fracture fixationClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1992, (280), 15–22.
