A hip joint simulator that can be used to evaluate the outcome of the cemented total hip replacement has been designed, manufactured and evaluated. The simulator produces motion of a cemented hip construct in the extension/flexion plane, with a socket to rotate internal/externally. At the same time a dynamic loading cycle is applied to the construct. A validation test was performed on a cemented femoral stem within a novel composite femur. The study demonstrates the value of using a hip joint simulator to evaluate the outcome of the cemented hip construct. A complex migration pattern of the cemented hip prosthesis with respect to load cycling was observed, demonstrated in vitro comparable prosthesis migration behaviour, both the stem migration and migration patterns, to that found clinically.
WangC. T.WangY. L.LiuG. A.Theoretical and experimental studies of mechanisms for loosening of prosthesis. Trans. ASME, Appl. Mechanics Div., 1989, 98, 225–228.
2.
HarrisW. H.The first 32 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. and Related Res., 1992, 274, 6–11.
3.
CollierJ. P.BauerT. M.BleoebaumR. D.Results of implant retrieval from postmortem specimens in patients with well functioning, long term total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. and Related Res., 1992, 274, 97–112.
4.
MaherS. A.PrendergastP. J.WaideD. V.Development of an experimental procedure for pre-clinical testing of cemented hip replacements. Trans. ASME, Bioengng Div. (Publication) BED, 1999, 43, 139–140.
5.
MaherS. A.PrendergastP. J.LyonsC. G.Measurement of the migration of cemented hip prosthesis—an in vitro test. Clin. Biomechanics, 2001, 16, 307–314.
6.
VillaT.PietrabissaR.QuagliniV.Testing procedure for biomechanical evaluation for nailed femur. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Biomechanics, Dublin, 2000; p. 109.
7.
MaherS. A.PrendergastP. J.Subsidence rates correlate with early failure in cemented hip prosthesis designs. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Biomechanics, Dublin, 2000, p. 111.
8.
CostiJ. J.DunlopD. G.BarkerD. S.Design and evaluation of a method: Measuring three-dimensional micromotion in a hip replacement. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Biomechanics, Dublin, 2000, p. 199.
9.
SaponaraT.CristofoliniL.ToniA.In vitro physiological load history to test cemented hip implants. In Proceedings of the Combined Orthopaedic Research Societies Meeting, Rhodes, Greece, 2001; p. 333.
10.
BrittonJ. R.PrendergastP. J.Design of a system for the application of muscle loading to the implanted proximal femur in a pre-clinical test. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Biomechanics, Dublin, 2000, p. 131.
11.
McKellopH.EbramzadehE.NiedererP. G.Comparison of the stability of press-fit hip prosthesis femoral stems using a synthetic model femur. J. Orthop. Res., 1991, 297–305.
12.
TencerA. F.JohnsonK. D.Biomechanics in Orthopaedic Trauma, 1994 (Martin Dunitz, London).
13.
MaquetP. G. J.Biomechanics of the Hip, 1985 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
14.
SmithS. L.BurgessI. C.UnsworthA.Evaluation of a hip joint simulator. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1999, 213 (H6), 469–473.
15.
VicecontiM.CavallottiG.AdrisanoA. O.Discussion on the design of a hip joint simulator. Med. Engng Physics, 1996, 18, 234–240.
16.
SmithS. L.UnsworthA.A comparison between gravimetric and volumetric techniques of wear measurement of UHMWPE acetabular cups against zirconia and cobalt chromium-molybdenum femoral heads in a hip simulator. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1999, 213 (H6), 475–483.
17.
MejiaL. C.BrierleyT. J.A Hip Wear Simulator for the Evaluation of Biomaterials in Hip Arthroplasty Components, 1993 (MTS System Corporation, Eden Prairie, Minnesota).
18.
SaikkoV.PaavolainenP.KleimolaM.Five station hip joint simulator for wear rate studies. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1992, 206 (H4), 195–200.
19.
TateishiT.HyodoK.KondoK.Simulator test of artificial joints. Mater. Sci. Engng, 1994, C1, 121–125.
20.
FreemanM. A.Plante-BordeneuveP.Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prosthesis. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1994, 76, 432–438.
21.
WalkerP. S.MaiS. F.CobbA. G.Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1995, 77-B, 205–714.
22.
JohnstonR. C.FitzgeraldR. H.HarrisW. H.Clinical and radiological evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1990, 72-A, 161–168.
23.
MowV. C.HayesW. C.Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics, 1991 (Raven Press, New York).
24.
SaikkoV.GraichenF.RohlmannA.Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J. Biomechanics, 1993, 26, 969–990.
25.
EnglishT. A.KilvingtonM.In vivo records of hip loads using a femoral implant with telemetric output. J. Biomed. Engng, 1979, 1 (2), 111–115.
26.
CrowninshieldR.JohnstonR. C.AndrewsJ. G.BrandR. A.A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. J. Biomechanics, 1978, 11 (2), 75–85.
27.
LiuC. Z.Dynamic simulation of cemented hip replacement integrity: Anin vitro study of cemented hip replacement. PhD thesis, University of Newcastle, 2003.
28.
OhI.HarrisW. H.Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1978, 60-A (1), 75–85.
29.
CristofoliniL.VicecontiM.CappelloA.Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J. Biomechanics, 1996, 29 (4), 525–535.
30.
BrummitK.HardakerC. S.Estimation of wear in total hip replacement using a ten station hip simulator. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1996, 210 (H2), 187–190.
31.
ScholesS. C.UnsworthA.Comparison of friction and lubrication of different hip prostheses. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2000, 214 (H1), 49–57.
32.
33.
34.
LiuC. Z.GreenS. M.McCaskieA. W.Some failure modes of four clinical bone cements. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2001, 214 (H4), 359–366.
35.
KissJ.MurrayD. W.TurnersmithA. R.Migration of cemented femoral components after THR-Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1996, 78-B, 796–801.
36.
LoudonJ. R.OlderM. W. J.Subsidence of the femoral component related to long-term outcome of hip replacement. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1989, 71-B (4), 624–628.
37.
KarrholmJ.BorssenB.LowenhielmG.Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter?J. Bone Jt Surg., 1994, 76-B, 912–915.
38.
KissJ.MurrayD. W.Turner-SmithA. R.Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for assessing migration of THR femoral components. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1995, 209 (H3), 169–175.
39.
TannerK. E.BonfieldW.DunnD.FreemanM. A.Rotational movement of femoral components of total hip replacements in response to an anteriority applied load. Engng in Medicine, 1988, 17 (3), 127–129.
40.
LiuC. Z.GreenS. M.WatkinsN. D.GreggP. J.McCaskieA. W.The effect of restraint on the creep behaviour of clinical bone cement. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 2002, 21 (12), 959–962.
41.
LiuC. Z.GreenS. M.WatkinsN. D.GreggP. J.McCaskieA. W.Creep behaviour comparison of CMW1 and Palacos R-40 clinical bone cements. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. in Medicine, 2002, 13, 1021–1028.
42.
MaherS. A.PrendergastP. J.ReidA. J.Design and validation of a machine for reproducible precision insertion of femoral hip prosthesis for preclinical testing. J. Biomed. Engng, 2000, 122, 203–207.
43.
SmithS. L.UnsworthA.Simplified motion and loading compared to physiological motion and loading in a hip joint simulator. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2000, 214 (H3), 233–238.
44.
LiuC. Z.GreenS. M.WatkinsN. D.GreggP. J.McCaskieA. W.Migration of a cemented hip joint prosthesis within a novel composite femur. In International Conference of Engineers and Surgeons onJoined at the Hip, London, 2002, paper C601/010.
45.
GheduzziS.HodeyJ.LatimerP.SchmotzerH.MilesA. W.In-vitro migration and micromotion measurements of a cementless hip stem under physiological loading conditions. In International Conference of Engineers and Surgeons on Joined at the Hip, London, 2002, paper C601/031.
