Several implant systems may be used to fuse the skull to the upper cervical spine (occipito-cervical fusion). Current biomechanical evaluation is restricted by the limitations of human cadaveric specimens. This paper describes the design and validation of a synthetic testing model of the occipital bone. Data from thickness measurement and pull-out strength testing of a series of human cadaveric skulls was used in the design of a high-density rigid polyurethane foam model. The synthetic occipital model demonstrated repeatable and consistent morphological and biomechanical properties. The model provides a standardized enviroment for evaluation of occipital implants.
GrobD.DvorakJ.PanjabiM.FroehlichM.HayekJ.Posterior occipitocervical fusion. A preliminary report of a new techniqueSpine, 1991, 16, S17–24.
5.
BryanW. J.InglisA. E.SculcoT. P.RanawatC. S.Methylmethacrylate stabilization for enhancement of posterior cervical arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritisJ. Bone Jt Surg. (Am.), 1982, 64-A, 1045–1050.
6.
RobertsD. A.DohertyB. J.HeggenessM. H.Quantitative anatomy of the occiput and the biomechanics of occipital screw fixationSpine, 1998, 23, 1100–1107.
HurlbertR. J.CrawfordN. R.ChoiW. G.DickmanC. A.A biomechanicalevaluation of occipitocervicalinstrumentation: Screw compared with wire fixationJ. Neurosurg., 1999, 90, 84–90.
9.
HeywoodA. W.LearmonthI. D.ThomasM.Internal fixation for occipito-cervicalfusionJ. Bone Jt Surg. (Am.), 1988, 70-B, 708–711.
10.
BaileyA. S.StanescaS.YeastingR. A.EbraheimN. A.JacksonW. T.Anatomic relationships of the cervicothoracic junctionSpine, 1995, 20, 1431–1439.
11.
JeanneretB.Posterior rod system of the cervical spine: A new implant allowing optimal screw insertionEur. Spine J., 1996, 5, 350–356.
12.
GrobD.DvorakJ.PanjabiM. M.AntinnesJ. A.The role of plate and screw fixation in occipitocervical fusion in rheumatoid arthritisSpine, 1994, 19, 2545–2551.
13.
LewisG.DrewryT. D.ShermanM. C.A thoracic spine testbed for the comparative biomechanical evaluation of spinal instrumentationsJ. Spinal Disorders, 1995, 8, 186–194.
14.
DickJ. C.BrodkeD. S.ZdeblickT. A.BartelB. D.KunzD. N.RapoffA. J.Anterior instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical comparisonSpine, 1997, 22, 744–750.
15.
KotaniY.CunninghamB. W.ParkerL. M.KanayamaM.McAfeeP. C.Static and fatigue biomechanical properties of anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems. A synthetic testing modelSpine, 1999, 24, 1406–1413.
16.
WilkeH. J.KrischakS.ClaesL. E.Formalin fixation strongly influences biomechanical properties of the spineJ. Biomechanics, 1996, 29, 1629–1631.
17.
KaabM. J.PutzR.GebauerD.PlitzW.Changes in cadaveric cancellous vertebral bone strength in relation to time. A biomechanical investigationSpine, 1998, 23, 1215–1219.
18.
OdaI.AbumiK.SellL. C.HaggertyC. J.CunninghamB. W.McAfeeP. C.Biomechanical evaluation of five different occipito-atlanto-axial fixation techniquesSpine, 1999, 24, 2377–2382.
