Finite element biphasic indentation of cartilage: A comparison of experimental indenter and physiological contact geometries

Abstract

In experimental cartilage indentation studies, the indenter is typically a plane-ended or hemispherically ended cylinder and can be either porous or non-porous. Joints such as the hip and knee, however, have much higher radii of curvature than those used in experimental indentation testing. In order to interpret the results from such testing in a physiological context it is therefore useful to explore the effect of contact geometry on the pore pressure and strain distribution generated in the cartilage layer. Articular cartilage can be described as a saturated porous medium, and can be considered a biphasic material consisting of a porous, permeable solid matrix, and an interstitial fluid phase. This behaviour has been predicted in this study using the ABAQUS soils consolidation procedure. Four contact geometries were modelled: two typical experimental configurations (5 mm radii cylindrical indenter and hemispherical indenters) and two effective radii representative of the hip and knee (20 and 100mm). A 10 per cent deformation, or a load of 0.9kN, was applied over a ramp time of 2 s, which was then maintained for a further 100 s. The porous indenter generated less pore pressure compared with the equivalent non-porous indenter and produced higher values of compress-ive strain in the solid matrix. The predictions made using the cylindrical indenters, porous and non-porous, were dominated by the concentrations at the edge of the indenter and overestimated the peak compressive strain in the tissue by a factor of 21 and a factor of 14 respectively when compared with the hip model. The hemispherical indenter predicted peak strains in similar positions to those predicted using physiological radii, however, the magnitude was overestimated by a factor of 2.3 when compared with the knee and by 5.7 when compared with the hip. The pore pressure throughout the cartilage layer reduced significantly as the radius of the indenter was increased.

Keywords

biphasic finite element modelling cartilage indenter contact geometries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Radin

E. L.

Burr

D. B.

Fyhrie

Brown

T. D.

Boyd

R. D.

Characteristics of joint loading as it applies to osteoarthritis In Biomechanics of Diarthrodial Joints (Eds Mow

V. C.

Ratcliffe

Woo

S. L-Y.

), 1990, Vol. 1, Ch. 16 (Springer-Verlag, New York).

Coletti

J. M.

Akeson

W. H.

Woo

S. L-Y.

A comparison of the physical behaviour of normal articular cartilage and the arthroplasty surface

J. Bone Jt Surg., 1972, 54-A (1), 147–160.

Kempson

G. E.

Mechanical properties of articular cartilage In Adult Articular Cartilage (Ed. Freeman

M. A. R.

), 1979, Ch. 6 (Pitman Medical, London).

Armstrong

C. G.

Mow

V. C.

Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration and water content

J. Bone Jt Surg., 1982, 64-A (1), 88–94.

Whipple

R. R.

Gibbs

M. C.

Lai

W. M.

Mow

V. C.

Mak

A. F.

Wirth

C. R.

Biphasic properties of repaired cartilage at the articulating surface In 31st Annual Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1985, p. 340.

Brown

T. D.

Singerman

R. J.

Experimental determination of the linear biphasic constitutive coefficients of human fetal proximal femoral chondroepiphysis

J. Biomechanics, 1986, 19 (8), 597–605.

Athanasiou

K. A.

Agarwal

Dzida

F. J.

Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage

J. Orthop. Res., 1994, 12 (3), 340–349.

Cohen

Gardner

T. R.

Ateshian

G. A.

The influence of transverse isotropy on cartilage indentation behavior, a study of the human humeral head In 39th Annual Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, San Francisco, California, 1993, p. 185.

Bachrach

N. M.

Ateshian

G. A.

Mow

V. C.

Altered load-support mechanism in articular cartilage due to impact induced defects in the subchondral plate In 40th Annual Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1994, p. 415.

10.

Warden

W. H.

Ateshian

G. A.

Grelsamer

R. P.

Mow

V. C.

Biphasic deformation material properties of bovine articular cartilage In 40th Annual Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1994, p. 413.

11.

Mak

A. F.

The apparent viscoelastic behaviour of articular cartilage—the contributions from the intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and interstitial fluid flows

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1986, 108, 123–130.

12.

Spilker

R. L.

Suh

J.-K.

Mow

V. C.

A finite element formulation of the nonlinear biphasic model for articular cartilage and hydrated soft tissues including strain-dependent permeability In Computational Methods in Bioengineering (Eds Spilker

R. L.

Simon

B. R.

), 1988, BED Vol. 9, pp. 81–92 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).

13.

Spilker

R. L.

Suh

J.-K.

Mow

V. C.

A finite element analysis of the indentation stress relaxation response of linear biphasic articular cartilage

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1992, 114, 191–201.

14.

Suh

J.-K.

Spilker

R. L.

Mow

V. C.

Finite element analysis of the indentation problem for articular cartilage using a finite deformation biphasic model In Advances in Bioengineering, 1990, BED Vol. 17, pp. 215–218 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).

15.

Suh

J.-K.

Spilker

R. L.

Holmes

M. H.

A penalty finite element analysis for nonlinear mechanics of biphasic hydrated soft tissues under large deformation

Int. J. Numer. Meth. in Engng, 1991, 32, 1411–1439.

16.

Simon

B. R.

Multiphase poroelastic finite element models for soft tissue structures

Appl. Mechanics Rev., 1992, 45 (6), 191–218.

17.

van der Voet

A. F.

Finite element modelling of load transfer through articular cartilage. PhD thesis, University of Calgary, Canada, 1992.

18.

Vermilyea

M. E.

Spilker

R. L.

A hybrid finite element formulation of the linear biphasic equations for hydrated soft tissue

Int. J. Numer. Meth. in Engng, 1992, 33, 567–593.

19.

Mow

V. C.

Kuei

S. C.

Lai

W. M.

Armstrong

C. G.

Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: Theory and experiments

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1980, 102, 73–84.

20.

Mak

A. F.

Lai

W. M.

Mow

V. C.

Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage—I. Theoretical analysis

J. Biomechanics, 1987, 20 (7), 703–714.

21.

Goldsmith

A. A. J.

Hayes

Clift

S. E.

Modelling the response of biomaterials and soft biological tissues using consolidation theory In ABAQUS Users’ Conference, Paris, France, 1995, pp. 305–319.

22.

Ateshian

G. A.

Lai

W. M.

Zhu

W. B.

Mow

V. C.

A biphasic model for contact in diarthrodial joints In Advances in Bioengineering, 1992, BED Vol.22 (extended abstract), (pp. 191–194 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).

23.

Dowson

Wright

Introduction to the Biomechanics of Joints and Joint Replacement, 1981 (Mechanical Engineering Publications, London).

24.

Warner

M. D.

Taylor

W. R.

Clift

S. E.

A method for determining contact between a non-porous surface and articular cartilage in a biphasic FE model In Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering—3 (Eds Middleton

et al.), 2000, pp. 207–212 (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam).

25.

Suh

J.-K.

Spilker

R. L.

Indentation analysis of biphasic articular cartilage: Nonlinear phenomenon under finite deformation

Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Engng, 1994, 116, 1–9.

26.

Ateshian

G. A.

Lai

W. M.

Zhu

W. B.

Mow

V. C.

An asymptotic solution for the contact of two biphasic cartilage layers

J. Biomechanics, 1994, 27 (11), 1347–1360.