It is known that wear mechanisms differ between the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) components of total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR). The difference in relative contact position or ‘kinematic conditions of contact’ between the metal and polymer components is thought to contribute to the contrast in observed wear mechanisms.
A reciprocating wear tester was used to evaluate three basic kinematic contact conditions: sliding, in which the relative contact position on the polymer remains stationary; gliding, where the contact position on the polymer reciprocates; and rolling, where the contact position on the polymer varies and the relative velocities of both components are equal.
All static load tests used cast Co—Cr alloy and irradiated Chirulen® UHMWPE in a 37 °C environment lubricated with bovine serum albumin. UHMWPE test sample wear was measured gravi-metrically at intervals of 600000 cycles. The results indicated a difference in wear factor (volume lost due to wear per unit load per unit sliding distance) between the three groups with varying relative motion. The study indicates that screening tests which evaluate wear properties of new materials for total joint replacement should reflect the different kinematic contact conditions.
AtkinsonJ. R.DowsonD.IsaacG. H.WroblewskiB. M.Laboratory wear tests and clinical observations of the penetration of femoral heads into acetabular cups in total replacement hip joints II: A microscopical study of the surfaces of Charnely polyethylene acetabular cupsWear, 1985, 104, 217–224.
2.
DowlingJ. M.AtkinsonJ. R.DowsonD.CharnleyJ.The characteristics of acetabular cups worn in the human bodyJ. Bone Jt Surg., 1978, 60-B, 375–382.
3.
McKellopH. A.CampbellP.ParkS. H.SchmalzriedT. P.GrigorisP.AmstutzH. C.SarmientoA.The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplastyClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1995, 311, 3–20.
4.
LandyM. M.WalkerP. S.Wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene components of 90 retrieved knee prosthesesJ. Arthroplasty, 1988, 3 (Suppl.), S73–85.
5.
RoseR. M.RiesM. D.PaulI. L.CrugnolaA. N.EllisE.On the true wear rate of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene in the total knee prosthesisJ. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1984, 29, 127–131.
6.
WrightT. M.BartelD. L.The problem of surface damage in polyethylene total knee componentsClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1986, 67–74.
7.
CampbellP.MaS.YeomB.McKellopH.SchmalzriedT. P.AmstutzH. C.Isolation of predominantly sub-micron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissuesJ. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1995, 29, 127–131.
8.
ClarkeI. C.CampbellP.KossovskyN.Debris-mediated osteolysis: A cascade phenomenon involving motion, wear, particulates, macrophage induction, and bone lysis In Particulate Debris from Medical Implants: Mechanisms of Formation and Biological Consequences, ASTM STP 1144 (Ed. St JohnK. R.), 1992, pp. 7–26 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
9.
CooperJ. R.DowsonD.FisherJ.Macroscopic and microscopic wear mechanisms in ultra-high molecular weight polyethyleneWear, 1993, 162-164, 378–384.
10.
WangA.SunD. C.StarkC.DumbletonJ. H.Wear mechanisms of UHMWPE in total joint replacementsWear, 1995, 181-183, 241–249.
11.
RamamurtiB. S.BragdonC. R.O'ConnorD. O.LowensteinJ. D.JastyM.EstokD. M.HarrisW. H.Loci of movement of selected points on the femoral head during normal gaitJ. Arthroplasty, 1996, 11, 845–852.
12.
BragdonC. R.O'ConnorD. O.LowensteinJ. D.JastyM.SyniutaW. D.The importance of multidirectional motion on the wear of polyethyleneProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1996, 210 (H3), 157–165.
13.
MorrisonJ. B.Bioengineering analysis of the force actions transmitted by the knee jointJ. Biomed. Engng, 1968, April, 164.
14.
AndriacchiT. P.StanwyckT. S.GalanteJ. O.Knee biomechanics and total knee replacementJ. Arthroplasty, 1986, 1, 211–219.
15.
LiJ.WyssU. P.CostiganP. A.DeluzioK. J.An integrated procedure to assess knee-joint kinematics and kinetics during gait using an optoelectric system and standardized X-raysJ. Biomed. Engng, 1993, 15, 392–400.
16.
BartelD. L.BicknellV. L.WrightT. M.The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacementAm. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1986, 68, 1041–1051.
17.
BartelD. L.RimnacC. M.WrightT. M.Evaluation and design of the articular surface In Controversies of Total Knee Arthroplasty (Ed. GoldbergV. M.), 1991 (Raven Press, New York).
18.
CriptonP. A.CornwallG. B.BryantJ. T.JeswietJ.A linear elastic fracture mechanics approach to predicting service lives for total knee replacements. Working papers from the 1st Seminar onLife Cycle Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 7-8 June 1993.
19.
EberhardtA. W.KimB. S.Stress intensity factors for a vertical surface crack in polyethylene subject to rolling and sliding contactJ. Biomech. Engng, 1998, 120, 778–783.
20.
WaldmanS. D.Dynamic contact stress and rolling resistance model for total knee replacements. MSc thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 1994.
21.
DavidsonJ. A.SchwartzG.Wear, creep, and frictional heat of femoral implant articulating surfaces and the effect on long-term performance—Part I—A reviewJ. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1987, 21, 261–285.
22.
DumbletonJ. H.Tribology of natural and artificial joints In Tribology Series, 1981 (Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Amsterdam).
23.
BlunnG. W.WalkerP. S.JoshiA.HardingeK.The dominance of cyclic sliding in producing wear in total knee replacementsClin. Orthop. Related Res., 1991, 273, 253–260.
24.
WaldmanS. D.CornwallG. B.KissR.MooreT. N.BoweA. J.Vibration monitoring in wear testing of orthopaedic biomaterials In Effects of Mechanical Stiffness and Vibration on Wear ASTM STP 1247 (Ed. BayerR. G.), 1995 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
25.
CzichosH.Basic tribological parameters, In ASM Handbook: Friction, Lubrication and Wear, Vol. 18, 1992, pp. 473–479 (ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio).
26.
ASTM: F732-82 Standard Practice for Reciprocating Pin-on-Flat Evaluation of Friction and Wear Properties of Polymeric Materials for Use in Total Joint Prostheses, Vol. 13, 1991, pp. 262–269 (American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
27.
ASTM: F75-92 Standard Specification for Cast Cobalt—Chromium—Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications, Vol. 13, 1994 (American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
28.
ASTM: F648 Standard Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants, Vol. 13, 1991, pp. 262–269 (American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
29.
RoseR. M.CiminoW. R.EllisE.CrugnolaA. N.Exploratory investigations on the structure dependence of the wear resistance of polyethyleneWear, 1982, 77, 89–104.
30.
SutulaL. C.CollierJ. P.WronaM.The role of polyethylene quality in wear In Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Hip and Knee Reconstruction (Eds CallaghanJ. J.DennisD. A.PaproskyW. G.RosenbergA. G.), 1995, pp. 35–41 (American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois).
31.
BoweA. J.A methodology for the evaluation of wear studies: Case study of an UHMWPE/CoCr/bovine serum tribological system at two temperatures. MSc thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 1994.
32.
CooperJ. R.DowsonD.FisherJ.The effect of transfer film and surface roughness on the wear of lubricated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular pros-thesesClin. Mater., 1993, 14, 295–302.
33.
McKellopH.ClarkeI. C.MarkolfK. L.AmstutzH. C.Wear characteristics of UHMW polyethylene: A method for accurately measuring extremely low wear ratesJ. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1978, 12, 895–927.
CriptonP. A.Compressive characterization of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene with applications to contact stress analysis of total knee replacements. MSc thesis, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 1993.
36.
HoodR. W.WrightT. M.BursteinA. H.Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: A method and its application to 48 total condylar prosthesesJ. Biomech. Engng Res., 1983, 17, 829–842.
37.
CornwallG. B.BryantJ. T.HanssonC. M.RudanJ.KennedyL. A.CookeT. D.A quantitative technique for reporting surface degradation patterns of UHMWPE components of retrieved total knee replacementsJ. Appl. Biomaterials, 1995, 6, 9–18.
38.
ClarkeI. C.McKellopH. A.Wear-screening and joint simulation studies vs. materials selection and prosthesis design In Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation (Ed. von RecumA. F.), 1986, pp. 114–129 (Macmillan, New York).
39.
LivermoreJ.IlstrupD.MorreyB.Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular componentAm. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1990, 72-A, 518–528.
40.
ClarkeI. C.McKellopH. A.Wear testing In Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation (Ed. von RecumA. F.), 1986, pp. 114–129 (Macmillan, New York).
41.
BegelingerA.de GeeA. W. J.Synopsis of the results from the international cooperative wear programLubrication Engng, 1970, 26, 56–63.
42.
CzichosH.BeckerS.LexowJ.Multilaboratory tri-botesting: Results from the Versaille advanced materials and standards programme on wear test methodsWear, 1987, 114, 109–130.
43.
PoggieR. A.WertJ. J.MishraA. K.DavidsonJ. A.Friction and wear characterization of UHMWPE in reciprocating sliding contact with Co-Cr, Ti-6A1-4V and zirconia implant bearing surfaces In Wear and Friction of Elastomers, ASTM STP 1145 (Eds DentonR.KeshavanM. K.), 1992 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
44.
SaikkoV. O.Wear and friction properties of prosthetic joint materials evaluated on a reciprocating pin-on-flat apparatusWear, 1993, 166, 169–178.
45.
StreicherR. M.Tribology in medicine: Testing and optimization of material combinations for endoprosthesesMed. Orthop. Technol., 1988, 108, 1–12.
46.
WeightmanB.LightD.A comparison of RCH 1000 and Hi-Fax 1900 ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenesBiomaterials, 1985, 6, 177–183.
47.
WrightK. W.DobbsH. S.ScalesJ. T.Wear studies on prosthetic materials using the pin-on-disc machineBiomaterials, 1982, 3, 41–48.
48.
SaikkoV. O.Wear of polyethylene acetabular cups against alumina femoral heads. 5 prostheses compared in a hip simulator for 35 million walking cyclesActa Orthopaedica Scand., 1993, 64, 507–512.
49.
RevellP. A.WeightmanB.FreemanM. A.RobertsB. V.The production and biology of polyethylene wear debrisArch. Orthop. Traumatic Surg., 1978, 91, 167–181.
