Direct skeletal attachment techniques have recently been identified as an alternative method for percutaneous attachment of prosthetic limbs. Osseointegrated implants for prosthetic attachments are subjected to a complex load condition. This finite element study investigates the effect of varying geometries of the implant on the stress and strain distribution in the area of the bone/implant interface. Simplified three-dimensional axisymmetric models of the femur and seven implants with different core diameters, external diameters, implant lengths and thread pitches were derived. The resulting stress and strain distributions were compared. The significance of each implant geometry was identified for improving implant design in the light of benefit to the bone/implant osseointegration and the bone remodelling of the femur.
ChildressD.The interfaces between humans and limb replacement components. In International Workshop onOsseointegration in Skeletal Reconstruction and Joint Replacement (Eds BranemarkP. I.), 1997 (Quintessence, Carol Stream, Illinois).
2.
HundW.BergnerN.GayO.Bioceramics in implant dentistry changes in clinical useCFI Ceramic Forum Int., 1998, 75 (7), 13–15.
3.
KasraM.AndersonJ. D.Framework design for an orofacial implant-supported prosthesisASME Bioengineering Division (Publication) BED, 1997, 36, 275–276.
4.
UedaM.NiimiA.KanedaT.Intra- and extraoral prostheses using osseointegrated implants after maxillofacial surgeryJ. Long-Term Effects Med. Implants, 1993, 3 (1), 41–56.
5.
LundborgG.BranemarkP. I.RosenB.Osseointegrated thumb prostheses: A concept for fixation of digit prosthetic devicesAm. J. Hand Surg., 1996, 21A (2), 216–221.
6.
RydevikB.Amputation prostheses and osseoperception in the lower and upper extremity. In International Workshop onOsseointegration in Skeletal Reconstruction and Joint Replacement (Eds BranemarkP. I.), 1997 (Quintessence, Carol Stream, Illinois).
7.
MorrisR. P.GreculaM. J.BufordW. L.PattersonR. M.Quantification of femoral surface strain after cementless stem implantation by computer analysis of the photoelastic methodASME Bioengineering Division (Publication) BED, 1997, 36, 139–140.
8.
ChangG. L.YangC. Y.Strain distribution of long bone with HA-coated IM implantBiomed. Engng Applic. Basis Commun., 1994, 6 (2), 174–178.
9.
OtaniT.WhitesideL. A.WhiteS. E.Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loadsJ. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1993, 27 (5), 575–585.
10.
McNamaraB. P.ToniA.TaylorD.Effects of implant material properties and implant-bone bonding on stress shielding in cementless total hip arthroplastyKey Engng Mater., 1995, 99–100, 309–314.
11.
SkalakR.Biomechanics of osseointegration. In International Workshop onOsseointegration in Skeletal Reconstruction and Joint Replacement (Eds BranemarkP. I.), 1997, pp. 45–53 (Quintessence, Carol Stream, Illinois).
12.
TaylorM.AbelE. W.Finite element analysis of poor distal contact of the femoral component of a cementless hip endoprosthesisProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1993, 207 (H4), 255–261.
CliftS. E.FisherJ.WatsonC. J.Finite element stress and strain analysis of the bone surrounding a dental implant. Effect of variation in bone modulusProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1992, 206 (H4), 233–241.
15.
VanBuskirkW. C.AshmanR. B.Elastic Moduli of Bone, Applied Mechanics Division, AMD, 1981, Vol. 45, pp. 131–143 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
16.
CowinS. C.LuoG.Modelling of ingrowth into implant cavities along the bone-implant interface. In International Workshop onOsseointegration in Skeletal Reconstruction and Joint Replacement (Eds BranemarkP. I.), 1997, pp. 57–68 (Quintessence, Carol Stream, Illinois).
17.
AbeH.HayashiK.3. Hard tissues In Data Book on Mechanical Properties of Living Cells, Tissues, and Organs (Ed. SatoM.), 1996, p. 303 (Springer-Verlag, Tokyo).
18.
LekholmU.AdellR.RocklerB.AlbrektssonT.BranemarkP. I.Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of endentulousness. A 15-year follow-up study. In Transactions of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials in Conjunction with the Interna,1981, Vol. (4, p. 44.
19.
BaumannJ. U.ScharA.MeierG.Reaction forces and moments at hip and knee. InORTHOPADE, 1992, 21 (1), 29–34.
20.
KowalkD. L.DuncanJ. A.VaughanC. L.Abduction-adduction moments at the knee during stair ascent and descentJ. Biomechanics, March 1996, 29 (3), 383–388.
21.
HuiskesR.Biomechanics of bone implant interactions In Frontiers of Biomechanics (Ed. SchmidS.), 1986, pp. 245–262 (Springer-Verlag, New York).
22.
RubinC. T.LanyonL. E.Biological modulation of mechanical influences in bone remodelling In Biomechanics of Diarthroidal Joints (Ed. MowV. C.), 1990, Vol. 112, pp. 3–30 (Springer-Verlag, New York).
