This article describes a portion of the Propulsion Integration project that deals with the design and optimization of the flow control in the FOI-EIC-01 inlet. It uses both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and wind tunnel testing in a way that both disciplines strongly interact with each other. Both the wind tunnel and CFD produce inputs for its counterpart and use outputs produced by their counterpart. The main chain of events during the design is the initial CFD analysis followed by the wind tunnel test and final CFD analysis.
JohanssonM.FoT25 2003–2005 Propulsion Integration final report (2006): FOI-R—2017–SE..
2.
TormalmM.Propulsion Integration Project — design and analysis of a compact UAV duct (2006): FOI-R—2018–SE..
3.
SamuelssonI.Test of an UCAV (Eikon) air inlet at static conditions in FOI S1 suckdown facility (2005): FOI-R—1572–SE..
4.
DahlenbringM.SmithJ.Simulation of S-duct dynamics using fluid-structure couple CFD. In Proceedings of the 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Francisco, 5–8 June 2006, AIAA paper2006–2981.
5.
DahlenbringM.Analysis of material and structure used within the FoT25 project propulsion integration (2006): FOI-R—2024–2006..
6.
SehlstedtN.ZdunekA.Influence to cavity RCS by curvature, RAM and vortex generators (2005): FOI-R—1531–SE..
7.
JohanssonM.DahlenbringM.SIGGE, a prediction tool for aeronautical IR signatures and its applications (2006): AIAA paper2006–3276.
8.
SehlstedtN.TengzeliusU.JohanssonM.Results of RCS calculations on an UAV inlet cavity (2005): FOI-RH—0532–SE..
9.
DahlenbringM.JohanssonM.FoT25 — IR calculations of Eikon within the project Design of a Low Signature UCAV and Propulsion Integration (2006): FOI-RH—0550–SE..
10.
MillerD. N.AddingtonG.Invited: Aerodynamic floweld control technologies for highly integrated airframe propulsion flowpaths (2004): AIAA paper2004–2625.
11.
KaldschmidtG.SylteboB. E.TingC. T.A 727 airplane centre duct inlet low speed performance conurbation model test for refanned JT8D engines, Phase 2 (1973 NASA-CR-134534, NASA, November.
12.
AndersonB. H.HuangP. S.PaschalW. A.CavatortaE.Study of vortex flow control of inlet distortionJ. Propuls. Power8619921266–1272.
13.
AndersonB. H.GibbJ.Vortex generator installation of steady state and dynamic distortion (1996 AIAA paper 1996–3279.
14.
AnbtawiA. J.BlackwelderR. F.LissamanP. B. S.LiebeckR. H.An experimental investigation of boundary layer ingestion in a diffusing S-duct with and without passive flow control (1999 AIAA paper 1999–0739.
AllanB. G.OwensL. R.Numerical modelling of flow control in a boundary-layer-ingesting offset inlet diffusers at transonic mach numbers (2006): AIAA paper2006–0845.
17.
AllanB. G.OwensL. R.LinJ. C.Optimal design of passive flow control for a boundary-layer-ingesting offset inlet using design-of-experiments (2006): AIAA paper2006–1049.
18.
OwensL. R.AllanB. G.GortonS. A.Boundary-layer-ingesting inlet flow control (2006): AIAA paper2006–839.
19.
DudekJ. C.Empirical model for vane-type vortex generators in a Navier—Stokes codeAIAA J.44820061779–1789.
20.
TinocoE. N.The changing role of computational fluid dynamics in aircraft development (1998 AIAA paper 98–2512.
21.
JirásekA.Vortex-generator model and its application to flow controlJ. Aircr.42620051489–1491.
22.
JirásekA.Mass flow boundary conditions for subsonic inflow and outflow boundaryAIAA J.4452006939–947.
23.
EliassonP.EDGE, a Navier—Stokes solver for unstructured gridsFinite volumes for complex applications III (London: Kogan Page Ltd.2002527–534.
24.
JirásekA.Design of vortex generator flow control in inlets, flow controlJ. Aircr.43620061886–1892.
25.
JirásekA.Vortex generator modeling and its application to optimal control of airflow in inlet (2006) Doctoral Thesis.
26.
JirásekA.Evaluation of the vortex generator flow control in the FOI-EIC-01 inlet at different flight conditions (2007): AIAA paper2007–5065.
