A comprehensive control strategy for integrated flight/propulsion systems

Abstract

Integration of flight and propulsion control systems in advanced aircraft has attracted much attention because of ever increasing demand on enhancement of performance and reliability. As the underlying dynamic couplings and non-linear interactions of flight and propulsion systems are too complex for realtime execution in onboard computational platforms, hierarchical hybrid (i.e. combined continuously varying and discrete event) architecture is proposed for the development of future generation control systems that will take the advantage of these interactions for mission enhancement. Although the original structures of continuously varying control systems for propulsion and flight are retained, discrete event supervisory (DES) control would facilitate decision-making for aircraft operation. DES decisions regarding propulsion and flight control influence the performance and reliability of the entire vehicle control system due to interactions at the level of continuously varying dynamics. A two-level hierarchical DES control system is designed to supervise and coordinate the operation of twin-engine aircraft propulsion with flight dynamics. In essence, the propulsion system is integrated with the flight dynamical system such that the DES controller at the propulsion level of hierarchy provides load balancing of the engines as well as overall health and mission management of the aircraft propulsion system. The parameter-scheduling dynamic-inversion controller stabilizes and drives the flight system in the vehicle operation envelope and compensates for potential unbalance and any other undesirable action, resulting from discrete event supervision of the propulsion system. Results of real-time simulation on a test bed are presented to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed control concept.

Keywords

integrated flight/propulsion supervisory control discrete event systems dynamic inversion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ramadge

P. J.

Wonham

W. M.

Supervisory control of a class of discrete event processes. SIAM J Control Optim., 1987, 25(1), 206–230.

Cassandras

C. G.

Lafortune

Introduction to discrete event systems, 1999 (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, USA).

Hopcroft

J. E.

Motwani

Ullman

J. D.

Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation, 2nd edition, 2001 (Addison-Wesley, Boston MA, USA).

Ray

Signed real measure of regular languages for discrete event supervisory control. Int. J. Control, 2005, 78(12), 949–967.

Chattopadhyay

Ray

Renormalized measure of regular languages. Int. J. Control, 2006, 79(9), 1107–1117.

Chattopadhyay

Ray

Language-measure-theoretic optimal control of probabilistic finite state systems. Int. J. Control, 2007, 80(8), 1271–1290.

Tolani

Horn

Ray

Integrated decision and control of human-engineered complex systems. Int. J. Gen. Syst., 2006, 35(3), 275–294.

Tolani

Horn

Yasar

Ray

Hierarchical control of rotorcraft for enhanced performance and structural durability. In the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005.

Yasar

Ray

Hierarchical control of aircraft propulsion systems: Discrete event supervisor approach. Control Eng. Pract., 2007, 15(2), 149–162.

10.

Kreiner

Lietzau

The use of onboard real-time models for jet engine control, 2003 (MTU Aero Engines, Munich, Germany).

11.

Ray

Caplin

Life extending control of aircraft: Trade-off between flight performance and structural durability. Aeronaut. J., 2000, 104(1039), 397–408.

12.

Caplin

Ray

Joshi

S. M.

Damage-mitigating control of aircraft for enhanced structural stability. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2001, 37(3), 849–862.

13.

Garg

Mattern

D. L.

Bullard

R. E.

Integrated flight/propulsion control system design based on a centralized approach. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn., 1991, 14(1), 107–116.

14.

Menon

P. K.

Iragavarapu

V. R.

Garg

Enhancing aircraft performance through flight/propulsion system integration. In the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, San Diego, CA, 1996.

15.

McWilliams

L. H.

Raven

E. A.

Sain

P. M.

A study of a propulsion control system for a VATOL aircraft. In Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Dayton, Ohio, USA, 1989, vol. 1, pp. 356–363.

16.

Bates

D. G.

Gatley

S. L.

Postlethwaite

Integrated flight and propulsion control system design using H1 loop-shaping techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, 1999, pp. 1523–1528.

17.

Garg

Partitioning of centralized integrated flight/propulsion control design for decentralized implementation. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technol., 1993, 1(2), 93–100.

18.

Harefors

Bates

D. G.

Integrated propulsion-based flight control system for a civil transport aircraft. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Glasgow, UK, 2002, pp. 132–137.

19.

Schmidt

P. H.

Garg

Holowecky

B. R.

A parameter optimization approach to controller partitioning for integrated flight/propulsion control application. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technol., 1993, 1(1), 21–36.

20.

Rysdyk

Calise

A. J.

Robust nonlinear adaptive flight control for consistent handling qualities. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technol., 2005, 13(6), 896–910.

21.

Diao

Passino

K. M.

Stable fault-tolerant adaptive fuzzy/neural control for a turbine engine. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technol., 2001, 9(3), 494–509.

22.

Parker

K. I.

Guo

T. H.

Development of a turbofan engine simulation in a graphical simulation environment. In JANNAF Aero-Propulsion Subcommittee Meeting, Destin, FL, USA, 2002.

23.

Adibhatla

Johnson

K. L.

Evaluation of nonlinear PSC algorithm on a variable cycle engine. In the AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, 1993.

24.

Perry

A. R.

The flightgear flight simulator. In the USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 2004.

25.

Tolani

Yasar

Ray

Yang

Anomaly detection in aircraft gas turbine engines. J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun., 2006, 3(2), 44–51.

26.

Brumbaugh

R. W.

An aircraft model for the AIAA controls design challenge. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 1994, 17(4), 747–752.

27.

Duke

E. L.

Antoniewicz

R. F.

Krambeer

K. D.

Derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model. NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, CA, USA, RP-1207, 1998.

28.

Calise

Lee

Sharma

Development of a reconfigurable flight control law for the X-36 tailless fighter aircraft. In the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Denver, CO, USA, 2000.