The eigenstructure necessary to achieve a good short-term attitude command response in a generic single-rotor helicopter is presented. It achieves appropriate mode decoupling and is consistent with the physical relationships between the state variables. This eigenstructure translates exactly into ideal transfer functions for use with a variety of control design methodologies. The paper discusses how such an eigenstructure is defined to satisfy the requirements of two important military rotorcraft specifications: US ADS 33 and UK DEF STAN 00970.
HarperR. P.CooperG. E.Handling qualities and pilot evaluation. J. Guidance and Dynamics, September 1986, 9(5), 515–529.
3.
PitkinB.Flight and Ground Handling Qualities, Military Defence Specification DEF-STAN 00–970, Ministry of Defence, September 1989.
4.
Anon.General Requirements for Helicopter Flying and Ground Handling Qualities, Mil-H-8501A, 1961.
5.
AVSCOMAeronautical Design Standard (ADS) 33C-Handling Qualities for Military Helicopters, 1989 (US Army AVSCOM).
6.
TakahashiM. D.Synthesis and evaluation of an H2 control law for a hovering helicopter. J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, May 1993, 16(3), 579–584.
7.
GribbleJ. J.Linear quadratic/loop transfer recovery design for a helicopter in low-speed flight. J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, July 1993, 16(4), 754–761.
8.
YueA.PostlethwaiteI.Improvement of helicopter handling qualities using H∞ optimisation. IEE Proc. D, May 1990, 137(3), 115–129.
9.
YueA.PostlethwaiteI.Robust helicopter control laws for handling qualities enhancement. In Helicopter Handling Qualities and Control, November 1988, pp. 14.1–14.17 (Royal Aeronautical Society).
10.
WalkerD.PostlethwaiteI.Full authority active control system design for a high performance helicopter. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual European Rotorcraft Forum, Glasgow, Scotland, September 1990, pp. III.3.2.1–14 (Royal Aeronautical Society).
11.
TakahashiM. D.H∞ helicopter control law design with and without rotor state feedback. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 1993, pp. 1323–1335 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
InnocentiM.StanziolaC.Performance-robustness trade off of eigenstructure assignment applied to rotorcraft. Aeronaut. J., 1990, 94(934), 124–131.
14.
MurphyR. D.NarendraK. S.Design of helicopter stabilization systems using optimal control theory. J. Aircraft, March 1969, 6(2), 129–136.
15.
AndersonB. D.O.MooreJ. B.Optimal Control and Linear Quadratic Methods, Information and System Sciences Series, 1989 (Prentice-Hall International Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
16.
DaviesR.ClarkeT.Robust eigenstructure assignment using the genetic algorithm and constrained state feedback. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering, 1996, 211(I1), 53–61.
17.
OsderS.CaldwellD.Design and robustness issues for highly augmented helicopter controls. J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, November 1992, 15(6), 1375–1387.
18.
MirfakhraieZ.GarrardW. L.Implicit and explicit model-following helicopter flight controllers. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 1994, pp. 1358–1365 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
19.
HindsonW. S.Implementation and flight-test of a multimode rotorcraft flight-control system for single-pilot use in poor visibility. In Mid-East Region National Specialists’ Meeting on Rotorcraft Flight Controls and Avionics Cherry Hill, New Jersey, October 1987, pp. 1–21 (American Helicopter Society).
20.
IngleS. J.CeliR.Effects of higher order dynamics on helicopter flight control law design. J. Am. Helicopter Soc., July 1994, 12–23.
21.
WalkerD. J.PostlethwaiteI.Advanced helicopter flight control using two-degree-of-freedom H∞ optimization. J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, March 1996, 19(2), 461–468.
22.
MirfakhraieZ.GarrardW. L.Design of helicopter control system to meet handling quality specification usingH∞ techniques. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 1993, pp. 1336–1341 (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
23.
YoungJ. S.LinC. E.Refined H∞-optimal approach to rotorcraft flight control. J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, April 1993, 16(2), 247–255.
24.
SunX. D.ClarkeT.RobustH∞-based implicit model-following control of helicopters. In IFAC Symposium on Robust Control Design, Rio de Janeiro, September 1994, pp. 249–254.
25.
MannessM. A.Murray-SmithD. J.Aspects of multivariable flight control law design for helicopters using eigenstructure assignment. J. Am. Helicopter Soc., July 1992, 37(3), 18–32.
26.
ParryD. L.K.Murray-SmithD. J.The application of modal control theory to the single rotor helicopter. In 11th European Rotorcraft Forum, London, 1985, pp. 78–1–78–16.
27.
GarrardW. L.LowE.Eigenspace design of helicopter flight control systems. Technical report DAAL03–86-K-0056, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, November 1990.
28.
GarrardW. L.LowE.ProutyS.Design of attitude and rate command systems for helicopters using eigenstructure assignment. J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, November 1989, 12(6), 783–791.
29.
LowE.GarrardW. L.Design of flight control systems to meet rotorcraft handling qualities specifications. J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, January 1993, 16(1), 69–78.
30.
CrossleyT. R.PorterB.Synthesis of helicopter stabilization systems using modal control theory. J. Aircraft, January 1972, 9(1), 3–8.
31.
SrinathkumarS.RhotenR. P.Eigenvalue/eigenvector control via spectral characterisation: An application to helicopter hover dynamics. In 9th ASILOMAR Conference on Circuits Systems and Computers, University of Santa Clara Naval Postgraduate School, San Francisco California, November 1975, pp. 605–609 (IEEE Circuits and Systems Society and IEEE Control Systems Society).
32.
D'AzzoJ. J.HoupisC. H.Linear Control System Analysis and Design: Conventional and Modern, McGraw-Hill Electrical Engineering Series, 4th edition, 1995 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
