A validation of the three-dimensional finite element contact method for use with Curvic couplings

Abstract

Curvic couplings transmit torque between parallel in-line shafts or turbine/compressor discs. They are used extensively within the aero-engine industry but can also be found in industrial gas turbines. The manufacture of Curvic couplings involves the precision cutting and grinding of mating teeth on the adjacent ends of the components; the assembly is then clamped together with bolts.

The design objectives for aerospace transmissions, and hence the Curvic coupling, are to reduce manufacturing cost, weight and size. The experimental testing of Curvic couplings within an aero-engine environment is time consuming and expensive. The objective of this paper is to justify confidence in the results from three-dimensional finite element (F E) contact analyses when investigating Curvic couplings. The accuracy of the FE analyses requires a fine mesh in the contact region and the capability to deal with stick-slip behaviour in multiple three-dimensional contact surfaces. A comparison of the results from a photoelastic test with the results from an FE analysis provides a validation of the FE contact method for use with Curvic couplings. The results presented in this paper indicate that the photoelastic results agree reasonably well with results of the FE method analyses.

Keywords

Curvic coupling photoelasticity numerical methods finite element method three-dimensional contact

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gleason Works, 1000 University Avenue, Rochester, NY 14603, USA, 1942.

Pisani

S. R.

Rencis

J. J.

Investigating Curvic coupling behaviour by utilizing the two- and three- dimensional boundary and finite element methods. In International Conference on Boundary Element Methods, XV: Fluid Flow and Computational Aspects, 10–13 August 1993, pp. 597–608 (Computational Mechanics).

ABAQUS, Users Manual, 1998 (Hibbitt Karlsson and Sorenson Inc.).

Fessler

Ollerton

Contact stress in toroids under radial loads. Br. J. Appl. Physics, 1957, 8, 387–393.

Fessler

Fricker

Friction and femoral prosthesis and model cone taper joints. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1989, 203, 1–14.

Fessler

An assessment of frozen stress photoelasticity. J. Strain Analysis, 1992, 27, 123–126.

Marston

R. E.

An automated micropolariscope; its design, development and use for tubular joint stress analysis. PhD thesis, Nottingham University, 1985.

Fessler

A micropolariscope for automatic stress analysis. J. Strain Analysis, 1987, 22, 25–35.

Burguete

R. L.

Patterson

E. A.

A photoelastic study of the effect on subsurface stresses of the contact geometry and friction. J. Strain Analysis, 1997, 32 (6), 425–433.

10.

Burguete

R. L.

Patterson

E. A.

A photoelastic study of contact between a cylinder and a half-space. Expl Mechanics, 1997, 37, 314–323.

11.

Richardson

I. J.

Hyde

T. H.

Becker

A. A.

Taylor

J. W.

A three-dimensional finite element investigation of the bolt stresses in an aeroengine Curvic coupling under a blade release condition. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part G, J. Aerospace Engineering, 2000, 214 (G4), 231–245.

12.

Hyde

T. H.

Fessler

Stress analysis of a complex cast node for offshore structures. In Proceedings of Conference on Applied Mechanics—3 (Eds Allison

Ruiz

), 1989, pp. 427–443 (Elsevier Applied Science).

13.

Hyde

T. H.

Photoelastic techniques. In Proceedings of Institute of Physics Conference on Modern Practice in Stress and Vibration Analysis (Ed. Wearing

J. L.

), 1993, pp. 15–23 (Sheffield Academic Press).

14.

Fessler

Hyde

T. H.

Photoelastic determination of elastic and elastic—plastic strain distributions in tube plates. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part E, J. Process Mechanical Engineering, 1994, 208 (E1), 85–92.

15.

Fessler

Hyde

T. H.

Stress distribution in gudgeon pins. J. Strain Analysis, 1997, 32 (5), 375–386.

16.

Cook

I. T.

Fessler

Hyde

T. H.

Assembly stresses in taper-locking shaft couplings. Part 1: Photoelastic work. J. Strain Analysis, 2001, 36 (1), 25–34.

17.

FEM GV, Version 5.1, Users Manual, 1998 (FEMSYS Limited, Leicester).

18.

Richardson

I. J.

Hyde

T. H.

Becker

A. A.

Taylor

J. W.

A comparison of two and three-dimensional finite element contact analyses of curvic couplings. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Methods in Contact Mechanics (Eds Gaul

Brebbia

C. A.

), 1999, pp. 389–399 (WIT Press, Southampton).