Wear and crack initiation of steel rails is a problem of great significance to the railway industry. A high wear rate shortens the life of rails and the frequent rail replacement is expensive in terms not only of resources but also of track access time and delays affecting timetables. In addition, railhead profiles change gradually as the rails are worn and the greater the wear rate, the more often the rails need to be reground to maintain good train running performance. In contrast, a low wear rate means that cracks have time to develop in the plastically deformed rail steel and these may propagate deeper into the rails with potentially disastrous consequences. Finding the optimum combination of wear and grinding to maintain railhead profile and prevent cracks from growing is key to running a safe and cost-efficient railway.
The large number of variables arising from track geometry, train dynamics, and wheel and rail profiles leads to wide variation in contact patch size and location. The two-dimensional model of ratcheting wear developed by Kapoor et al. has been developed to model the damage accumulation near the surface of the rail on the basis of a full three-dimensional contact stress distribution. Different rail steel microstructures can also be modelled and the effects of microstructure on wear and crack initiation are explored.
KapoorA.Wear by plastic ratchettingWear, 1997, 212, 119–130.
2.
KapoorA.A re-evaluation of the life to rupture of ductile metals by cyclic plastic strainFatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1994, 17 (2), 201–219.
3.
TyfourW. R.BeynonJ. H.KapoorA.The steady state wear behaviour of pearlitic rail steel under dry rolling-sliding contact conditionsWear, 1995, 180, 79–89.
4.
TyfourW. R.BeynonJ. H.KapoorA.Deterioration of rolling contact fatigue life of pearlitic rail steel due to dry-wet rolling-sliding line contactWear, 1996, 197, 255–265.
5.
TyfourW. R.BeynonJ. H.The effect of rolling direction reversal on the wear rate and wear mechanism of pearlitic rail steelTribal. Int., 1994, 27 (6), 401–412.
6.
ChallenJ. M.OxleyP. L.B.HockenhullB. S.Prediction of Archard's wear coefficient assuming a low cycle fatigue mechanismWear, 1986, 111, 275–288.
7.
LaceyP.TorranceA. A.The calculation of wear coefficients for plastic contactsWear, 1991, 145, 367–383.
8.
TorranceA. A.A method for calculating boundary friction and wearWear, 2005, 258, 924–934.
9.
KapoorA.FranklinF. J.Tribological layers and the wear of ductile materialsWear, 2000, 245, 204–215.
10.
FranklinF. J.WidiyartaI.KapoorA.Computer simulation of wear and rolling contact fatigueWear, 2001, 251, 949–955.
11.
FranklinF. J.ChungT.KapoorA.Ratcheting and fatigue-led wear in rail-wheel contactFatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2003, 26, 949–955.
12.
KapoorA.BeynonJ. H.FletcherD. I.Loo-MorreyM.Computer simulation of strain hardening for pearlitic rail steel undergoing repeated contactJ. Strain Anal., 2004, 39 (4), 383–396.
13.
SuX.ClaytonP.Ratchetting strain experiments with a pearlitic steel under rolling/sliding contactWear, 1997, 205, 137–143.
14.
ClaytonP.SuX.Surface initiated fatigue of pearlitic and bainitic steels under water lubricated rolling/sliding contactWear, 1996, 200, 63–73.
15.
WidiyartaI. M.FranklinF. J.KapoorA.Modelling thermal effects in ratcheting-led wear and rolling contact fatigue. Proceedings of 7th International Conference onContact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems, Brisbane, Australia, 24–27 September 2006.
16.
LojkowskiW.DjahanbakhshM.BürkleG.Gier-LotkaS.ZielinskiW.FechtH.-J.Nanostructure formation on the surface of railway tracksMater. Sci. Eng., 2001, A303, 197–208.
17.
LojkowskiW.MillmanY.ChugunovaS. I.GoncharovaI. V.DjahanbakhshM.BürkleG.FechtH.-J.The mechanical properties of the nanocrystalline layer on the surface of railway tracksMater. Sci. Eng., 2001, A303, 209–215.
18.
BerthierY.DescartesS.BusquetM.NiccoliniE.DesrayaudC.BailletL.Baietto-DubourgM. C.The role and effects of the third body in the wheel-rail interactionFatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2004, 27, 423–436.
19.
DescartesS.DesrayaudC.NiccoliniE.BerthierY.Presence and role of the third body in a wheel-rail contactWear, 2005, 258, 1081–1090.
20.
GrieveD. G.Dwyer-JoyceR. S.BeynonJ. H.Abrasive wear of railway track by solid contaminantsProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit, 2001, 215, 193–205.
21.
LewisR.Dwyer-JoyceR. S.Wear at the wheel/rail interface when sanding is used to increase adhesionProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit, 2006, 220, 29–41.
22.
ModiO. P.MondalD. P.PrasadB. K.SinghM.KhairaH. K.Abrasive wear behaviour of a high carbon steel: Effects of microstructure and experimental parameters and correlation with mechanical propertiesMater. Sci. Eng., 2003, A343, 235–242.
23.
ModiO. P.PrasadB. K.JhaA. K.DasguptaR.YegneswaranA. H.Low-stress abrasive wear behaviour of a 0.2% C steel: Influence of microstructure and test parametersTribol. Lett., 2003, 15 (3), 249–255.
24.
JhaA. K.PrasadB. K.ModiO. P.DasS.YegneswaranA. H.Correlating microstructural features and mechanical properties with abrasion resistance of a high strength low alloy steelWear, 2003, 254, 120–128.
25.
KapoorA.FranklinF. J.WongS. K.IshidaM.Surface roughness and plastic flow in rail wheel contactWear, 2002, 253, 257–264.
26.
FranklinF. J.FletcherD. I.KapoorA.Computer models for studying crack initiation. Proceedings of the World Congress onRailway research, Edinburgh, UK, 28–30 September 2003.
27.
KraussG.High-carbon steels: Fully pearlitic microstructures and applications In Steels: processing, structure and performance, 2005, pp. 281–295 (ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio).
28.
SchastlivtsevV. M.TabatchikovaT. I.MakarovA. V.EgorovaL. Yu.YakovlevaI. L.Wear resistance of carbon steel with a structure of thin-plate pearliteMet. Sci. Heat Treat., 2001, 43 (1–2), 30–33.
29.
EdenH. C.GarnhamJ. E.DavisC. L.Influential microstructural changes on rolling contact fatigue crack initiation in pearlitic rail steelsMater. Sci. Tech., 2005, 21 (6), 623–629.
30.
GarnhamJ. E.FranklinF. J.FletcherD. I.KapoorA.DavisC. L.Predicting the life of steel railsIMechE, Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit, 2007, 221 (F1), 45–58.
31.
TaborD.The hardness of metals, 1951 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, London).
32.
FletcherD. I.FranklinF. J.KapoorA.Image analysis to reveal crack development using a computer simulation of wear and rolling contact fatigueFatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2003, 26, 957–967.
33.
FletcherD. I.KapoorA.Rapid method of stress intensity factor calculation for semi-elliptical surface breaking cracks under three-dimensional contact loadingIMechE, Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit, 2006, 220 (F3), 219–234.
34.
CarrollR. I.BeynonJ. H.Decarburisation and rolling contact fatigue of a rail steelWear, in press.
35.
KalkerJ. J.The computation of 3-D rolling contact with dry frictionInt. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 1979, 14 (9), 1293–1307.
