The need to optimize inspection intervals of railway wheelsets involves, among other aspects, a reliable estimation of fatigue crack growth in the axles. With this in mind, the present paper focuses on the description of the considered axle made of A1N steel, and on some typical load spectra. Application of an opportune algorithm, derived from the dedicated soft-ware NASGRO®, made it possible to obtain life predictions in terms of cycles, and to discuss the influence of service loads. Life estimates were then analysed together with probability of detection curves of different non-destructive testing techniques in order to determine the total probability of observing, during periodical inspections, cracks or defects.
HillmansenS.SmithR. A.The management of fatigue crack growth in railway axlesProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit, 2004, 218, 327–336.
3.
ZerbstU.VormwaldM.AnderschC.MädlerK.PfuffM.The development of a damage tolerance concept for railway components and its demonstration for a railway axleEng. Fract. Mech., 2003, 72, 209–239.
4.
HoddinotD. S.Railway axle failure investigations and fatigue crack growth monitoring of an axleProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit, 2004, 218, 283–292.
SchijveJ.Fatigue of structures and materials, 2004 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York).
8.
BroekD.The practice of damage tolerance analysis In Fatigue and fracture, ASM Handbook, vol. 19, 1996 (ASM International, USA).
9.
BerettaS.MadiaM.SchoedelM.ZerbstU.SIF solutions for cracks at notches under rotating bending. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference onFracture (ECF16), Alexandropoulos, Greece, 2006.
10.
BarbieriC.BerettaS.CarboniM.Analysis of crack growth at R = −1 under variable amplitude loading on a steel for railway axles. In Proceedings of the 7th International ASTM/ESIS Symposium onFatigue and fracture, Tampa, Florida, USA, 2007.
11.
BerettaS.CarboniM.Inspection intervals of railway axles: influence of stress spectrum. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference onEngineering structural integrity assessment (ESIA8), Manchester, UK, 2006.
12.
CantiniS.GhidiniA.BerettaS.CarboniM.‘Safe life’ inspection intervals of railway axles: comparison of crack growth properties of different steel grades. In Proceedings of the 14th International Wheelset Congress, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2004.
13.
FisherG.GrubisicV. Bemessung von radsatzwellen - einflussgrssen und vorgehen bei der auslegung, Bericht FB-226, LBF, Darmstadt, 2005.
14.
NASGRO® Consortium.Fatigue crack growth computer program NASGRO® version 3.0. user manual, JSC- 22267B. NASA Technical report, 2001, available from http://www.nasgro.swri.org.
15.
RudlinJ.MuhammedA.SchneiderC.Inspection reliability and periodicity for rail axle inspectionInsight, Non-Destr. Test. Cond. Monit., 2006, 48, 348–351.
16.
EN13103.Railway applications - wheelsets and bogies - non powered axles - design method. CEN, 2001.
17.
ElberW.Damage tolerance in aircraft structureASTM STP, 1971, 486, 230–242.
18.
BerettaS.CarboniM.CerriniA.Inspection intervals of railway axles: POD and controlling methodologies (in Italian)Italian J. NDT, 2006, 9, 687–695.
19.
BerettaS.CarboniM.Experiments and stochastic model for propagation lifetime of railway axlesEng. Fract. Mech., 2006, 73, 2627–2641.
20.
BerettaS.CarboniM. Final report of the research contract #P69/04, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, 2006.
21.
BerettaS.CarboniM.CantiniS.GhidiniA.Application of fatigue crack growth algorithms to railway axles and comparison of two steel gradesProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit, 2004, 218, 317–326.
22.
BerettaS.CarboniM. Rotating vs. plane bending for crack growth in railway axles. ESIS-TC24 Meeting, Geesthacht, February 2005.
23.
ZerbstU.MädlerK.HintzeH.Fracture mechanics in railway applications - an overviewEng. Fract. Mech., 2005, 72, 163–194.
24.
BerettaS.CarboniM.Simulation of fatigue crack propagation in railway axlesJ. ASTM Int., 2005, 2, 1–15.
25.
BenyonJ. A.WatsonA. S.The use of Monte-Carlo analysis to increase axle inspection interval. In Proceedings of the 13th International Wheelset Congress, Roma, Italy, 2001.
26.
RudlinJ. R.ShippR.Review of rail axle inspection methods. In Proceedings of the International Seminar onRailway axles, London, UK, 2003.
27.
WIDEM EU Project.Wheelset integrated design and effective maintenance, available from http://www.widem.org.
28.
PyyP.Human reliability analysis methods for probabilistic safety assessment, Vol. 422, 2000 (VTT Publications, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland).
29.
NEA/CSNI/R(98)1.Critical operator actions: human reliability modelling and data issues. Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD 62060, Paris, 1998.
30.
WallM.WedgwoodF. A.BurchS.Modelling of NDT reliability (POD) and applying corrections for human factors. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference onNDT, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1998.
31.
MurgatroydR. A.SeedH.WorrallG.CrutzenS. Human reliability in inspection. Results of Action 7 of PISC III Programme, 1994.
