Mechanical behaviour of powders using a medium pressure flexible boundary cubical triaxial tester

Abstract

A medium pressure (<21 MPa) flexible boundary cubical triaxial tester was designed to measure the true three-dimensional response of powders. In this study, compression behaviour and strength of a microcrystalline cellulose powder (Avicel® PH102), a spray-dried alumina powder (A16SG), and a fluid-bed-granulated silicon nitride based powder (KY3500) were measured. To characterize the mechanical behaviour, three types of triaxial stress paths, that is, the hydrostatic triaxial compression (HTC), the conventional triaxial compression (CTC), and the constant mean pressure triaxial compression (CMPTC) tests were performed. The HTC test measured the volumetric response of the test powders under isostatic pressure from 0 to 13.79MPa, during which the three powders underwent a maximum volumetric strain of 40.8 per cent for Avicel® PH102, 30.5 per cent for A16SG, and 33.0 per cent for KY3500. The bulk modulus values increased 6.4-fold from 57 to 367MPa for Avicel® PH102, 3.7-fold from 174 to 637 MPa for A16SG, and 8.1-fold from 74 to 597MPa for KY3500, when the isotropic stress increased from 0.69 to 13.79 MPa. The CTC and CMPTC tests measured the shear response of the three powders. From 0.035 to 3.45MPa confining pressure, the shear modulus increased 28.7-fold from 1.6 to 45.9MPa for Avicel® PH102, 35-fold from 1.7 to 60.5MPa for A16SG, and 28.5-fold from 1.5 to 42.8MPa for KY3500. In addition, the failure stresses of the three powders increased from 0.129 to 4.41 MPa for Avicel® PH102, 0.082 to 3.62 MPa for A16SG, and 0.090 to 4.66MPa for KY3500, respectively, when consolidation pressure increased from 0.035 to 3.45MPa. In addition, the shear modulus and failure stress values determined from the CTC test at 2.07, 2.76, and 3.45MPa confining pressures are consistently greater than those from the CMPTC test at the same constant mean pressures. This observation demonstrates the influence of stress paths on material properties. The CTT is a useful tool for characterizing the three-dimensional response of powders and powder mixtures.

Keywords

powders mechanical behaviour triaxial testing cubical triaxial tester

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mittal

Puri

V. M.

Correlation between powder deposition methods and green compact quality: Part 1 Mechanical properties of powders, and Part II Compact quality and correlations. Particulate Science and Technology, 1999 17, 283–299, 301–315.

ASTM. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.08, 1995 (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA).

Jenike

A. W.

Storage and Flow of Solids, Bulletin No. 123, 1964 (Utah Engineering Station, Bulletin of the University of Utah, Utah).

Peschl

I. A.S.Z.

Mechanical properties of powders. Bulk Solids and Handling, 1988 8 (5), 615–624.

Arthur

J. R. F.

Cubical devices: Versatility and constraints. In Donaghe

R. T.

(Eds), Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, 1988 pp. 743–765 (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA).

Harder

Schwedes

The development of a truly biaxial shear tester. Particle Characterization, 1985 2, 149–153.

Tsunakawa

Aoki

Measurement of failure properties of granular materials and cohesive powders. Powder Technology, 1982 33 (2), 249–256.

Haaker

Wiersma-van Schendel

W. J. A.

A constant volume shear tester—development and experience. Bulk Solids and Handling, 1993 13 (1), 129–133.

Ladipo

D. D.

Puri

V. M.

Computer controlled shear cell for measurement of flow properties of particulate materials. Powder Technology 1997 92, 135–146.

10.

Duffy

S. P.

Puri

V. M.

Evaluation of computer controlled dynamic yield locus tester. Powder Technology 1999 101, 257–265.

11.

Bishop

A. W.

Henkel

D. J.

The Triaxial Test, 1974 (Edward Arnold Ltd., London).

12.

Kjellmann

Report on an apparatus for consummate investigation of the mechanical properties of soils. Proc. 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1936 pp. 16–20.

13.

Hambly

E. C.

A new true triaxial apparatus. Geotechnique, 1969 19 (2), 307–309.

14.

H.-Y.

Scott

R. F.

A new soil testing apparatus. Geotechnique, 1967 17 (1), 40–56.

15.

Green

G. E.

Strength and deformation of sand measured in an independentstress control cell. Proc. Roscoe Memorial Symposium on Stress-Strain Behavior of Soils, 1971 pp. 285–323.

16.

Lade

P. V.

Duncan

J. M.

Cubical triaxial tests on cohesionless soil. J. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1973 99 (SM10), 793–812.

17.

Sture

Desai

C. S.

Fluid cushion truly triaxial or multiaxial testing device. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1979 2 (1), 20–33.

18.

Arthur

J. R. F.

Dunstan

Enstad

G. G.

Determination of the flow functions by means of a cubic plane strain tester. Int. J. Bulk Storage in Silos, 1985 1 (2), 7–10.

19.

Kamath

Puri

V. M.

Measurement of powder flow constitutive model parameters using a cubical triaxial tester. Powder Technology 1997 90, 59–70.

20.

Michelis

A true triaxial cell for low and high pressure experiments. Int. J. Rock Mechanics and Mineral Science and Geomechanical Abstracts, 1985 22 (3), 183–188.

21.

Meier

R. W.

H.- Y.

Sture

A direct tensile loading apparatus combined with a cubical test cell for testing rocks and concrete. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1985 8 (2), 71–78.

22.

Mechanical behavior of powders: Tester design, load-response measurement and constitutive modeling, 1999. PhD Thesis (The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802, USA).

23.

Zhang

Puri

V. M.

Manbeck

H. B.

Physical properties effect on stress-strain behavior of wheat en masse—Part I: Load response dependence on initial bulk density and moisture content. Trans. ASAE, 1989 32 (1), 194–202.

24.

Mittal

Puri

V. M.

Mancino

C. F.

Measurement of bulk mechanical properties and modeling the load-response of rootzone sands. Part 1: Round and angular monosize and binary mixtures. Particulate Science and Technology, 2001 19 (2), 145–173.

25.

Desai

C. S.

Siriwardane

H. J.

Constitutive laws for engineering materials—with emphasis on geologic materials, 1984 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

26.

Huang

Puri

V. M.

A three-dimensional finite element model for powder compaction—Time dependent formulation and validation. Particulate Science and Technology, 2000 18 (4), 257–274.