Straight-line braking dynamic analysis of a partly filled baffled and unbaffled tank truck

Abstract

The straight-line braking performance characteristics of a partly filled tank truck with and without transverse baffles are investigated in the presence of transient fluid slosh within the tank. The dynamic interactions of the floating cargo with the vehicle are evaluated by integrating a dynamic fluid slosh model of the partly filled tank with and without transverse baffles with the seven-degrees-of-freedom pitch plane model of a tridem truck. The dynamic fluid slosh within the tank containing equally spaced four curved single-orifice baffles with flow equalizer is modelled using three-dimensional Navier—Stokes equations coupled with the volume-of-fluid equation and analysed using the FLUENT software. The coupled tank—vehicle model is subsequently analysed to determine the straight-line braking properties for different fill volumes, magnitudes of braking treadle pressure, and road surface adhesion coefficients, while the cargo load is considered to be constant. The results show interactions of the sloshing cargo with the vehicle. A degradation of the braking performance of the partly filled tank truck is evident in the presence of transient fluid slosh, particularly in the absence of baffles. The braking performance, however, is highly dependent upon the fill volume, presence of baffles, and severity of braking input. For a clean-bore tank truck, the stopping distance increases monotonically with decreasing fill volume, while the addition of transverse baffles in general results in considerably shorter stopping distance. The baffled tank truck, however, reveals a relatively shorter stopping distance under an intermediate fill condition (approximately 52.1 per cent), compared with the lower and higher fill volumes. Although the analyses are limited to conventional single-orifice baffles, the proposed coupled vehicle—tank model could serve as an important tool for exploring alternative baffle designs and layouts.

Keywords

fluid slosh volume-of-fluid model tank truck braking performance fluid—structure interaction baffle designs dynamic load factor

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Winkler

‘Rollover of heavy commercial vehicles.’

Univ. Michigan Transpn Res. Inst. Res. Rev. 31 (4) (2000): 1–17

Yan

Siddiqui

Rakheja

Modearessi

‘Transient fluid slosh and its effect on the rollover-threshold analysis of partially filled conical and circular tank trucks.’

Int. J. Heavy Veh. Systems 12 (4) (2005): 323–343

Kang

Rakheja

Stiharu

‘Cargo load shift and its influence on tank vehicle dynamics under braking and turning.’

Int. J. Heavy Veh. Systems 9 (3) (2002): 173–203

Rakheja

Sankar

Ranganathan

‘Roll plane analysis of articulated tank vehicles during steady turning.’

Veh. System Dynamics 17 (1988): 81–104

Ranganathan

Rakheja

Sankar

‘Kineto-static roll plane analysis of articulated tank vehicles with arbitrary tank geometry.’

Int. J. Veh. Des. 10 (1) (1989): 89–111

Rakheja

Ranganathan

‘Estimation of the rollover threshold of heavy vehicles carrying liquid cargo: A simplified approach.’

Heavy Veh. Systems, Int. J. Veh. Des. 1 (1) (1993): 79–98

Rakheja

Sankar

Ranganathan

‘Influence of tank design factors on the rollover threshold of partially filled tank vehicles.’ SAE paper 892480, 1989

Ranganathan

Ying

Miles

J. B.

‘Analysis of fluid slosh in partially filled tanks and their impact on the directional response of tank vehicles.’ SAE paper 932942, 1993, pp. 39–45.

10.

Ranganathan

Ying

Miles

J. B.

‘Development of a mechanical analogy model to predict the dynamic behaviour of liquids in partially filled tank vehicles.’ SAE paper 942307, 1994

11.

Mantriota

‘Directional stability of articulated tank vehicles: A simplified model.’

Heavy Veh. Systems, Int. J. Veh. Des. 10 (1–2) (2003): 144–165

12.

Dai

Setiawan

‘A new non-linear approach to analysing the dynamic behaviour of tank vehicles subjected to liquid sloshing.’

Proc. IMechE, Part K: J. Multi-body Dynamics 219 (2005): 75–86

13.

Wang

Z. Q.

Rakheja

Sun

C. Z.

‘Influence of partition location on the directional stability of a partially filled tank truck.’ SAE paper 952637, 1995.

14.

Ranganathan

Yang

Y. S.

‘Impact of liquid load shift on the braking characteristics of partially filled tank vehicles.’

Veh. System Dynamics 26 (1996): 223–240

15.

Sankar

Ranganathan

Rakheja

‘Impact of dynamic fluid slosh loads on the directional response of tank vehicles.’

Veh. System Dynamics 21 (1) (1992): 385–404

16.

Yan

G. R.

Liquid slosh and its influence on braking and roll responses of partly filled tank vehicles. (PhD Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 2008)

17.

Sayar

B. A.

Baumgarten

J. R.

‘Pendulum analogy for nonlinear fluid oscillations in spherical containers.’

J. Appl. Mechanics 48 (1981): 769–772

18.

Hirt

C. W.

Nichols

B. D.

Pomeroy

N. C.

‘SOLA — a numerical solution algorithm for transient fluid flows.’ Report LA-5852, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, 1975

19.

Hirt

C. W.

Amsden

A. A.

Cook

J. L.

‘An arbitrary Langrangian—Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds.’

J. Comput. Physics 14 (1974): 227–253

20.

Armenio

‘An improved MAC method (SIMAC) for unsteady high-Reynolds free surface flows.’

Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 24 (2) (1997): 185–214

21.

Kim

‘Numerical simulation of sloshing flows with impact load.’

Appl. Ocean Res. 23 (2001): 53–62

22.

T. C.

Lou

Y. K.

Flipse

J. E.

Bridges

T. J.

‘A numerical analysis of large amplitude liquid sloshing in baffled containers.’ Report MA-RD-940–82046, Ocean Engineering Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA, 1982

23.

Rumold

‘Modeling and simulation of vehicles carrying liquid cargo.’

Multibody System Dynamics 5 (2001): 351–374

24.

Biglarbegian

J. W.

‘Tractor—semitrailer model for vehicles carrying liquids.’

Veh. System Dynamics 44 (11) (2006): 871–885

25.

Yan

G. R.

Rakheja

Siddiqui

‘Experimental study of liquid slosh dynamics in a partially filled tank.’

J. Fluids Engng (2009): (accepted for publication)

26.

Pacejka

Bakker

‘The magic formula tire model.’ In Tyre models for vehicle dynamics analysis (Ed. Pacejka

), 1993, pp. 1–18 (Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam).

27.

Cao

Rakheja

C.-Y.

‘Pitch attitude control and braking performance analysis of heavy vehicle with interconnected suspensions.’ SAE paper 2007–01-1347, 2007

28.

Wong

J. Y.

Theory of ground vehicles (New York: John Wiley 2001)

29.

Delaigue

Eskandarian

‘A comprehensive vehicle braking model for predictions of stopping distance.’

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 218 (2004): 1409–1417

30.

Fancher

P. S.

Ervin

R. D.

Winkler

C. B.

Gillespie

T. D.

‘A factbook of the mechanical properties of the components for single-unit and articulated heavy trucks.’ Report UMTRI-86–12, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1986

31.

Issa

R. I.

‘Solution of implicitly discretized fluid flow equations by operator splitting.’

J. Comput. Physics 62 (1986): 40–65

32.

Kang

Rakheja

Stiharu

‘Optimal tank geometry to enhance static roll stability of partially filled tank vehicles.’ SAE paper 1999–01-3730, 1999, pp. 29-40

33.

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, 1998

34.

Code of Federal Regulations, CFR Title 49 — Transportation, Part 178, 10–1-15, 2006 edition.

35.

Modaressi-Tehrani

Rakheja

Stiharu

‘Three-dimensional analysis of transient slosh within a partly-filled tank equipped with baffles.’

Veh. System Dynamics 45 (6) (2007): 525–548