An efficient energy recovery system for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is developed and tested. The principle and characteristics are analysed in detail. Then the mathematical model is derived step by step. Combining the merits and the defects of H2 optimal control and H∞ robust control, the robust hybrid controller is designed to guarantee both the system performance and the robust stability. The comparative simulated and experimental results showed that the dynamic performance and robust stability of the proposed scheme were superior to those of the proportional-integral method; the vehicle recycled more kinetic energy during braking and the driving range was increased.
ChanC. C.The state of the art of the electric and hybrid vehicles. Proc. IEEE, 2002, 90(2), 247–275.
2.
CaoB. G.ZhangC. W.BaiZ. F.Trend of development of technology for electric vehicles (in Chinese). J. Xi'an Jiaotong Univ., 2004, 38(1), 1–5.
3.
ChicurelR.A compromise solution for energy recovery in vehicle braking. Energy, 1999, 24, 1029–1034.
4.
MartiniS.The MAN hydrobus: A drive concept with hydrostatic brake energy recovery. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advanced and hybrid vehicles, University of Strathclyde, UK, 1984, Vol. 2, pp. 27–34 (University of Strathclyde, Glasgow).
5.
VintM. K.Design and construction of a fuel efficient braking system. SAE paper 871233, 1987.
6.
PourmovahedA.BeachleyN. H.FronczakF. J.Analytical and experimental modeling of a hydraulic energy regeneration system. In Proceedings of the 1990 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA, 1990, paper 90-WA/FPST-13 (America Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
7.
PanagiotidisM.DelagrammatikasG.AssanisD.Development and use of a regenerative braking model for a parallel hybrid electric vehicle. In Proceedings of the SAE2000 World Congress, Detroit, Michigan, USA, 2000, SAE paper 2000-01-0995 (SAE International, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
8.
CikanekS. R.BaileyK. E.Regenerative braking system for a hybrid electric vehicle. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 8-10 May2002, pp. 3129–3134 (IEEE, New York).
9.
MiC.LinH.ZhangY.Iterative learning control of antilock braking of electric and hybrid vehicles. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol., 2005, 54(2), 486–494.
10.
PatersonJ.RamsayM.Electric vehicle braking by fuzzy logic control. In Proceedings of the IEEE Industy Applications Society Annual Meeting (IASAM'93), Orlando, Florida, USA, 1993, pp. 2200–2204 (IEEE, New York).
11.
GaoH. W.GaoY. M.EhsaniM.A neural network-based SRM drive control strategy for regenerative braking in EV and HEV. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (IEMDC'01), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2001, pp. 571–575 (IEEE, New York).
12.
WicksF.DonnellyK.HallS.Modelling regenerative braking and storage for vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC'97) Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 1997, pp. 2030–2035 (IEEE, New York).
13.
RahmanK. M.FahimiB.SureshG.RajarathnamA. V.EhsaniM.Advantage of switched reluctance motor applications to EV and HEV: Design and control issues. IEEE Trans. Industry Applic., 2000, 36(1), 111–121.
14.
YeoH.KimH.Hardware in the loop simulation of regenerative braking for a hybrid electric vehicle. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2002, 216(11), 855–864.
15.
WuH. X.ChengS. K.CuiSh. M.A controller of brushless DC motor for electric vehicle. IEEE Trans. Magnetics, 2005, 41(1), 509–513.
16.
KhatunP.BinghamC. M.SchofieldN.MellaP. H.Application of fuzzy control algorithm for electric vehicle antilock braking/traction control systems. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol., 2003, 52(5), 1356–1364.
17.
ChungS. K.Robust speed control of brushless direct-drive motor using integral variable structure control. IEE Proc., Electric Power Applic., 1995, 142(6), 361–370.
18.
CholulaS.ClaudioA.RuizJ.Intelligent control of the regenerative braking in an induction motor drive. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electrical and electronics engineering (ICEEE'05), Mexico City, Mexico, 2005, pp. 302–308 (IEEE, New York).
19.
LennonW. K.PassinoK. M.Intelligent control for brake systems. IEEE Trans. Control System Technol., 1999, 7(3), 188–202.
20.
DoyleC. J.GloverK.State space solution to standard H2 and H control problems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1989, 34(8), 831–847.
21.
GloverK.McfarlaneD.Robust stabilization of normalized coprime factor plant descriptions with H bounded uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1989, 34(8), 821–830.
22.
LeeJ.NelsonD. J.Rotating inertia impact on propulsion and regenerative braking for electric motor driven vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC'05), Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2005, pp. 308–314 (IEEE, New York).
23.
CaricchiF.CrescimbiniG.NoiaD.PiroloD.Experimental study of a bidirectional DC—DC converter for the DC link voltage control and regenerative braking in PM motor drives devoted to electrical vehicles. In Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (XPEC'94), Orlando, Florida, USA, 13–17 February 1994, Vol. 1, pp. 381–386 (IEEE, New York).
24.
PaoloM.LeopoldoR.GiorgioS.Small-signal analysis of DC—DC converters with sliding mode control. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 1997, 12(1), 96–102.
