Characterization of an axle-gear whine sound in a sports utility vehicle and its objective evaluation based on synthetic sound technology and an artificial neural network

Abstract

The gear whine sound of an axle system is one of the most important sound qualities in a sports utility vehicle (SUV). Previous work has shown that, because of masking effects, it is difficult to evaluate the gear whine sound objectively by using only the A-weighted sound pressure level. In this paper, the characteristics of the axle-gear whine sound were first investigated on the basis of synthetic sound technology, and a new objective evaluation method for this sound was developed by using sound metrics, which are the psychoacoustic parameters, and the artificial neural network (ANN) used for the modelling of the correlation between objective and subjective evaluation. This model developed by using ANN was applied to the objective evaluation of the axle-gear whine sound for real SUVs and the output of the model was compared with subjective evaluation. The results indicate a good correlation of over 90 per cent between the subjective and objective evaluations.

Keywords

sound quality axle gear whine noise sound metrics neural network

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Lee

S. K.

Kim

B. S.

Park

D. C

. Objective evaluation of the rumbling sound in passenger cars based on an artificial neural network. Proc. IMechE Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2005, 219(4), 457–469.

2 Ishihama

Sakai

Katano

Nakamura

. Effect of basic design parameters of automotive engines on their sound characteristics. In Proceedings of the 2003 SAE Noise and Vibration Conference, Traverse City, Michigan, USA, 2003, SAE paper 2003–01–1507 (Society of Automotive Engineers, New York).

3 Lee

S. K.

White

P. R

. The enhancement of impulsive noise and vibration signals for fault detection in rotating and reciprocating machinery. J. Sound Vibr., 1998, 217(3), 485–505.

4 Ruhala

Burroughs

C. B

. Tire/pavement interaction noise source identification using multi-planar near field acoustic holography. In Proceedings of the 1999 SAE Noise and Vibration Conference, Traverse City, Michigan, USA, 1999, SAE paper 1999–01–1733 (Society of Automotive Engineers, New York).

5 Blommer

Amman

Abhyankar

Dedeker

. Sound quality metric development for wind buffeting and gusting noise. In Proceedings of the 2003 SAE Noise and Vibration Conference, Traverse City, Michigan, USA, 2003, SAE paper 2003–01–1509 (Society of Automotive Engineers, New York).

6 Lee

S. K

. Identification and reduction of gear whine noise of the axle system in a passenger van. SAE Paper 2005–01–2302, 2005.

7 Becker

S. B.

. Gear noise rating prediction based on objective measurement. SAE Paper 1999–01–1721, 1999.

8 Becker

S. B.

. Objective noise rating of gear whine. SAE Paper 1999–01–1720, 1999.

9 Lee

S. K.

Chae

H. C

. The application of artificial neural networks to the characterization of interior noise booming in passenger cars. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2004, 218(1), 33–42.

10.

10 Bishop

C. M

. Neural networks for pattern recognition, 1995 (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

11.

11 Matrn

. Neural network design, 1996 (PWS Publishing Boston, Massachusetts).

12.

12 Lee

S. K

. Adaptive signal processing and higher order time frequency analysis for acoustic and vibration signatures in condition monitoring PhD Thesis, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, 1998.

13.

13 Gade

Herlufsen

Konstantin-Hansen

Vold

. Characteristics of the Vold-Kalman order tracking filter. Bruel Kjaer Tech. Rev., 1999 No. 1, pp. 1–59.

14.

14 Zwicker

Fastl

. Psychoacoustics: facts and models, 2nd edition, 1999 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).

15.

15 Stevens

S. S.

Hallowell

M. D

. Hearing its psychology and physiology, 1983 (American Institute of Physics, New York).

16.

16 Moore

B. C. J.

Glasberg

B. R

. A revision of Zwicker's loudness model. Acoustica, 1996, 82, 335–345.

17.

17 Aures

W. A

. Procedure for calculating auditory roughness. Acoustica, 1985, 58, 268–281.

18.

18 Bismarck

. Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds. Acoustica, 1974, 30, 159–172.

19.

19 Aures

W. A

. The sensory euphony as a function of auditory sensations. Acoustica, 1985, 58, 282–290.

20.

20 Mueller

H. G.

Killion

M. C

. An easy method for calculating the articulation index. Hearing J., 1990, 9, 14–17.

21.

21 Aures

W. A

. Berechnungsverfahren für den Wohlklang beliebiger Schallsignale, ein Beitrag zur georbezogenen Schallanalyse PhD Thesis, Munich University, 1994.