Optimization of bonnet thickness with respect to pedestrian safety

Abstract

Head and face injuries in car–pedestrian accidents account for 60 per cent of all pedestrian fatal injuries, whereas 17.3 per cent of head injuries were due to the bonnet. The above values demonstrate the necessity to consider more carefully the role of the bonnet in pedestrian head safety. Redesigning the bonnet structure to improve pedestrian protection has recently received considerable attention by automobile manufacturers and industry institutes. However, there is a lack of research that considers methods of choosing the most effective thicknesses of bonnet skin and bonnet reinforcement with respect to pedestrian safety. This study analyses the effects of the bonnet skin and bonnet reinforcement thicknesses on pedestrian head injury by performing simulations of headform-impactor-to-bonnet tests according to the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee Working Group 17 regulations for different thicknesses. An optimization method of selecting the most effective thicknesses of bonnet skin and bonnet reinforcement will be introduced. Many positions on the bonnet surface are considered to enhance pedestrian friendliness by using this method. Moreover, a bonnet with the optimal thicknesses is not only pedestrian friendly but also as stiff as possible. Based on the proposed method, this study presents steps for optimizing the bonnet skin and bonnet reinforcement thicknesses using a particular automobile model.

Keywords

pedestrian safety bonnet head injury headform impactor optimal design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Motor vehicle traffic crash fatality counts and estimates of people injured for 2007: 2007 annual assessment. Report DOT-HS-811-034, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USASeptember 2008

Berg

F. A.

Egelhaaf

Bakker

Burkle

Herrmann

Scheerer

Pedestrian protection in Europe – the potential of car design and impact testing. Report for the United Nations, UN Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland 2002

Ishikawa

Kore

Furumoto

Kuroda

Evaluation of pedestrian protection structures using impactors and full-scale dummy tests. In Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on The enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV) , Nagoya, Japan, 19–22 May 2003, paper 271 12 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC

Kalliske

Friesen

Improvements to pedestrian protection as exemplified on a standard-sized car. In Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on The enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–7 June 2001, paper 283 10 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC

Resele Laimbock

Safety and crash behavior. Da-Yeh Inst. Technol., Taiwan, AE&ICE Ser. 1993 21, 1–74

Fuerstenberg

K. Ch.

Pedestrian protection using laserscanners. In Proceedings of the Eighth International IEEE Conference on Intelligent transportation systems (ITSC '05), Vienna, Austria, 16 September 2005 437–442 IEEE, New York

Fuerstenberg

K. Ch.

Dietmayer

K. C. J.

Object tracking and classification for multiple active safety and comfort applications using a multilayer laserscanner. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV 2004), Parma, Italy, 14–17 June 2004 802–807 IEEE, New York

Philomin

Duraiswami

Davis

Pedestrian tracking from a moving vehicle. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV 2000), Detroit, Michigan, USA, 3–5 October 2000 350–355 IEEE, New York

Curio

Edelbrunner

Kalinke

Tzomakas

von Seelen

Walking pedestrian recognition. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transpn Systems 2000 1, (3), 155–163

10.

Zanella

Butera

Gobetto

Ricerche

Smart bumper for pedestrian impact recognition. In Proceedings of the European Workshop on Smart structures in engineering and technology , Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 4763 2003 106–112 SPIE, Bellingham, Washington

11.

Fredriksson

Håland

Yang

J. K.

Evaluation of a new pedestrian head injury protection system with a sensor in the bumper and lifting of the bonnet's rear part. In Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Conference on The enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–7 June 2001, paper 131 12 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC

12.

Maki

Asai

Development of pedestrian protection technologies for ASV. JSAE Rev. 2002 23, (3), 353–356

13.

Han

Y. H.

Lee

Y. W.

Development of a vehicle structure with enhanced pedestrian safety. SAE paper 2003-01-1232 2003

14.

Simms

C. K.

Developments in crash safety: A triumph of design in bioengineering. In Perspectives on design and bioengineering: Essays in honour of C. G. Lyons Simms

C. K.

Prendergast

P. J.

2008 39–55 Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Dublin

15.

Directive 2003/102/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003. Off. J. Eur. Un. 2003 L 321/15, (OJEU, Luxembourg)

16.

Improved test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passenger cars. Report, Working Group 17, European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee 2002

17.

Teng

T. L.

Nguyen

T. H.

Development and validation of FE models of impactor for pedestrian testing. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2008 22, (9), 1660–1667

18.

, FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center, The George Washington University, Ashburn, Virginia, USA, Applications, Finite element model archive, 2000–2009, available from http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html

19.

Payne

A. R.

Patel

Head injury criteria tolerance levels. Report (Project 427519), Motor Industry Research Association, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, UK 2001

20.

Stander

Roux

Goel

Craig

A design optimization and probabilistic analysis tool for engineering analyst. In LS-OPT user's manual, version 3.3 2008 Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, California

21.

Col

Furini

Mueller

Trivero

Static-vibrational design of a bonnet with frame topological optimization. In Proceedings of the MSC User Conference, Turin, Italy, 15–16 October 1998