Facilitating the driver detection of road surface type by selective manipulation of the steering-wheel acceleration signal

Abstract

Previous research has investigated the possibility of facilitating the driver detection of road surface type by means of selective manipulation of the steering-wheel acceleration signal. In previous studies a selective increase in acceleration amplitude has been found to facilitate road-surface-type detection, as has selective manipulation of the individual transient events which are present in the signal. The previous research results have been collected into a first guideline for the optimization of the steering-wheel acceleration signal, and the guideline has been tested in the current study. The test stimuli used in the current study were ten steering-wheel acceleration—time histories which were selected from an extensive database of road test measurements performed by the research group. The time histories, which were all from midsized European automobiles and European roads, were selected such that the widest possible operating envelope could be achieved in terms of the r.m.s. value of the steering acceleration, the kurtosis, the power spectral density function, and the number of transient events present in the signal. The time histories were manipulated by means of the mildly non-stationary mission synthesis algorithm in order to increase, by a factor of 2, both the number and the size of the transient events contained within the frequency interval from 20 Hz to 60 Hz. The ensemble, composed of both the unmanipulated and the manipulated time histories, was used to perform a laboratory-based detection task with 15 participants, who were presented the individual stimuli in random order. The participants were asked to state, by answering ‘yes’ or ‘no’, whether each stimulus was considered to be from the road surface that was displayed in front of them by means of a large photograph on a board. The results suggest that the selectively manipulated steering-wheel acceleration stimuli produced improved detection for eight of the ten road surface types which were tested, with a maximum improvement of 14 per cent in the case of the broken road surface. The selective manipulation did lead, however, to some degradation in detection for the motorway road stimulus and for the noise road stimulus, thus suggesting that the current guideline is not universally optimal for all road surfaces.

Keywords

Keywords detection perception enhancement vibration automobile steering road

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bregman

A. S.

Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound, (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1999).

McAdams

‘Recognition of auditory sound sources and events.’ In Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition (Eds McAdams

Bigand

), 1993 (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

Wright

J. K.

Auditory object perception: Counterpoint in a new context Master's Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1986.

Berber-Solano

T. P.

Giacomin

J. A.

‘Perception enhancement system for automotive steering.’ In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics (EACE 2005), Chania, Crete, Greece, 29 September—1 October 2005.

Berber-Solano

T. P.

Evaluation of the human cognitive detection of road surfaces based on the feedback vibrations provided by the automobile steering wheel PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2008.

Giacomin

J. A.

Woo

Y. J.

‘A study of the human ability to detect road surface type on the basis of steering wheel vibration feedback.’

Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 219 (11) (2004): 1259–1270 DOI: 10.1243/095440705X34955.

Giacomin

J. A.

Woo

Y. J.

‘Beyond comfort: Information content and perception enhancement.’

Engng Integrity 16 (2004): 8–16.

Giacomin

J. A.

Abrahams

‘Human fatigue due to automobile steering wheel vibration.’ In Proceedings of the SIA Conference on

Car and train comfort, Le Mans, France, 15–16 November, 2000.

Giacomin

J. A.

Steinwolf

Staszewski

W. J.

‘An algorithm for mildly non-stationary mission synthesis (MNMS).’

Engng Integrity 7 (2000): 44–56.

10.

Speed: Know your limits, leaflet, 2006, available from http://www.dft.gov.uk/think_media/241030/241145/2006speedleaflet.pdf.

11.

Giacomin

J. A.

Gnanasekaran

‘Driver estimation of steering wheel vibration intensity: Questionnaire-based survey.’

J. Engng Integrity Soc. 18 (2005): 23–29.

12.

Manual of G&W V20 electrodynamic shaker, (Gearing & Watson Electronics Ltd., Hailsham, East Sussex 1995).

13.

Manual of Entran MSC6, (Entran Devices Inc., Fairfield, New Jersey 1991).

14.

LMS Cada-X Fourier monitor manual, revision 3.5FZ, (LMS International, Leuven 2002).

15.

BS 7085:1989 Guide to safety aspects of experiments in which people are exposed tomechanical vibration and shock, 1989 (British Standards Institution, London).

16.

Pheasant

Haslegrave

C. M.

Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work, 3rd edition, 2005 (Taylor & Francis, London).

17.

Reynolds

D. D.

Keith

R. H.

‘Hand—arm vibration, Part 1: Analytical model of the vibration response characteristics of the hand.’

J. Sound Vibr. 51 (2) (1977): 237–253.

18.

ISO 13091–1:2001 Mechanical vibration - vibrotactile perception thresholds for the assessment of nerve dysfunction - Part1: Methods of measurement at the fingertips, 2001 (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva).

19.

Hinton

P. R.

Statistics explained: A guide for social science students, (Routledge, London 1999).

20.

Gescheider

G. A.

Psychophysics. The fundamentals, 3rd edition, 1997 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London).